Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Curious: ST 46 vs. OS 46LA

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 25 of 25 known posts recovered

Bill Little · Aug 08, 2004 12:49 PM

#0 source
For those of you that have flown and worked with both: What are the similarities (are there any other than stated size) and how does power/torque compare? I have used several ST 46, stock and reworks, but no LAs so far.
TIA
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

GLBahrman · Aug 08, 2004 02:45 PM

edited#1 source
Hi Bill,
I tried a OS 46 on my profile stunt ship that normally sports a ST 46 and it flew just fine. I like them both. The prop that worked the best on one motor does not work on the other and visa versa. The RPM sweet spot is different on the two motors. But set up correctly they will both do the job. The OS 46 runs 800 to 1000 rpm's higher depending on the prop than the ST 46 and will not pull the pitch that the ST 46 likes. It performs better with the lower pitch. I am running the APC 11 X 4 on the OS 46 and a Brian Eather 11 X 5 3/4 undercamber on my ST 46. This prop will not work unless you have a venturi on your ST 46 of .173 dia. I've been using the same fuel 10%nitro, 22% oil, 1/2 and 1/2 caster/synthetic. These are the stats I got from Crist Rigotti on his OS 46 setup. Prop is a APC 12 1/4 X 3 3/4 cut down to 11 3/4. Launch at 10,000 rpm. Venturi is .274 dia and spraybar is .135 dia. Both the OS and the ST have been quick starters for me maybe 2 to 3 flips at the most. On the ST 46 it requires a little more priming to start reliably (ring motor).

The following was posted by Steve Moon on another thread.
L L: It would be hard to go wrong with the OS LA 46. It is a great running motor, and it is a great deal.
We have run several of these down here in Dallas, and had good luck with all of them. We use the APC 12.25 x 3.75 CL prop (usually available at your LHS, as it is very popular with the RC Fun Flyers) cut down to 11.75". We also have tried just about every muffler imaginable and have had our best result with a tube muffler such as Randy Smith or Richard Oliver sells. We use a Sllivan RST 6 oz. tank with pressure. Run the motor just short of a steady 2-cycle and it will perform exactly the same every time. Hours and hours of troublefree and hasslefree use.

Later, Steve


The following was posted by Patrick Rowan on another thread.
After trying a number of different prop MFGs & sizes I've found the Bolly 12x4 CF to be the best prop for my LA .46s. Launch a little over 10,000 rpm.

Bill Little · Aug 08, 2004 03:50 PM

#3 source
Thanks Greg,
I have run the ST 46 quite a bit, just wondering if the OS would pull the same size, or bigger, plane with adequate power.
Several guys around here are using the OS, but they never had ST 46's to compare them to. (young whipper snappers! hahaha)
It appears to me that the OS *might*, due to it's higher rpm run, pull a little more ship than the ST. Evidenced by Steve Fitton and his Time Machine 50 with 46LA. But, alas, I have no first hand experience with the OS. I do, however have a few good running St 46. Was/am considering a 46 LA, but want to have a better idea as to it's pulling power.
BTW: How's the Magnum 36 doing?
Thanks again!
Bill <><


When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

Pancho · Aug 08, 2004 03:40 PM

#2 source
Hi Bill, As one of the earliest pioneers with the LA .46 I have had much success using the "old style" Top Flites in 11 X 5 and 6 sizes. Also lately one of my .46's runs real well on an ugly Zinger 11X5! Go figure! One secret for these engines is to keep the oil on the high side. My personal formula is 5 or 7 % nitro with 22% castor oil and 3% synthetic/ Klotz oil. Have close to 500 runs on one specimine and its still going strong. You've seen this engine, its the one on my Model Air profile which I have been flying for 5 full seasons. Tank size is 5.5 ounces and I must pull anywhere from .5 to 1.0 oz. to stay within the time limit. Good luck buy an LA.46 wwithout fear...loose the fancy rear NVA go to a stock FP set up. Start out with a small venturi incert and ream it out with a tapered reamer until you find the best opening for your plane, fuel, temperature, etc. NEVER use the drills to open up the venturi they are too agressive and take out too much material. The reamer is much more subtle.

SRiese5283 · Aug 08, 2004 03:56 PM

#4 source
SNIP>>>>NEVER use the drills to open up the venturi they are too agressive and take out too much material. The reamer is much more subtle.

Thats why you get a Lettered set.

Bill Little · Aug 08, 2004 04:03 PM

#5 source
Ah Phil, old buddy, old pal, Mr. Winky,
The question is: How does compare to the ST 46?????? hahaha
I know how sweet yours, and others' run, but considering power, will they pull a bigger plane? Same size? Smaller? Pinto? (the Ford, not the Mathis)
Thanks, Buddy..... coming to Charlotte?
Bill <><


When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

Pancho · Aug 08, 2004 10:15 PM

#7 source
Hi Bill, Don't know about the Charlotte event as of yet! However I do know that the ST.46 drinks fuel as Ty has dtated. I hve no regrets in leaving my ST.46's sit in my drawer! The LA Has no ring to tire out at the wrong time and it will pull hefty planes! Most of mine need to diet! I had uffered with an old and most ugly Midwest Skyraider until I enlarged the tail and put an LA .46 up front! Still looked ugly but flew like a world beater! Yest it was heavy as well as ugly but as a flyer it was beautiful! Winkies Uber Alles!

MikeC · Aug 09, 2004 01:49 PM

#9 source
Bill,
BIGS is correct you can't compare these two engines, apples to apples it can't be done. Both engines operate and fly differently.

I have a T&L ST46 and the OS46LA. Without a doubt the OS has the edge on raw power. The power band is very broad.

I used a profile Cavalier as a test bed. I ran a OS40FP, ST46 & OS46LA. The ST46 & the OS40FP were similar in power

The ST would fly the Cavalier on 4.5 ounces of fuel with a zinger 11/6 prop on a 4-2-4 break. The full pattern was not a problem and good line tension everywhere, 5.3 second laps.

The OS40FP would fly the Cavalier on 4.5 ounces of fuel on a Zinger 12/6 prop, 4-2-4 break, 5.7 second laps, excellent line tension and a full pattern, no problem.

The OS46LA would fly the Cavalier on 4.5 ounces of fuel however you could not waste a step of fly an extra lap. I used a zinger 12/6 and a 13/5 prop. The airframe was so over powered that most of the flight was flown 4 stroke only, 6 second plus laps. You could almost go to sleep during the Square 8 maneuver. All verticle maneuvers were slow and powerful.

The OS46LA is a powerful engine, in the right airframe it would be a winner. I would love to build a Tom Dixion Nakke and power it with a 46LA.

I'll see you in Atlanta in the fall.

Mike Clark

ty marcucci · Aug 08, 2004 10:09 PM

#6 source
Quick and dirty, the only thing I can recall is the LA is easier on fuel mileage. Seems to have lots of power. I use 11X4 Power props or 11X5 cut down from 12X5. After my 4th Cardinal, parts of 2 & 3 (save most of the pieces) gained weight, the LA 46 really pulls it around. I had an ST .46 on one and it just drank up fuel that I never got to the four leaf clover. The LA .46 got me through it in nice fashion and then I had an over run. Same tank. FWIW.

bigseminole · Aug 08, 2004 11:40 PM

#8 source
I really think that you are dealing with completely different engines, that are suitable for different props, airframes, etc.

You can assuredly find a detailed answer in the threads.

Bigs

GLBahrman · Aug 11, 2004 08:18 PM

#15 source
>Quick and dirty, the only thing I can recall is the LA is <
>easier on fuel mileage. Seems to have lots of power. I use <
>11X4 Power props or 11X5 cut down from 12X5. After my 4th <
>Cardinal, parts of 2 & 3 (save most of the pieces) gained <
>weight, the LA 46 really pulls it around. I had an ST .46 on <
>one and it just drank up fuel that I never got to the four <
>leaf clover. The LA .46 got me through it in nice fashion <
>and then I had an over run. Same tank. FWIW. <


On my ST 46 I use 5 1/2 oz. at 15% nitro for the pattern. On my OS 46 powered Cardinal (Profile) I do the pattern with 4 oz. at 10% nitro and have enought left over for about 5 level laps.

Igor Burger · Aug 09, 2004 02:02 PM

#10 source
Go for piped LA

Z2 · Aug 09, 2004 02:25 PM

#11 source
Bill,

I have flown with both and like both. I like the Tigre from a classic stand point but like the LA for cost and ease of operation. I have mine in a profile with 587 sq/in span and 44 ozs. I use an APC 11x5 most of the time with 9.6k release and use the OS large venturi and NVA. It flies with authority on just under 4 ozs with about 10-12 laps after the pattern. Mine took a long time to really break in and now just hums along. I should get the first flight on my new Tempest 40 this weekend and am installing this engine in the plane. I'll let you know how it goes.

MikeC · Aug 09, 2004 11:35 PM

#12 source
Yea Z2,
I had about 2 hours of bench time on my LA46. This engine was a nasty finger biter before I found the needle setting and quit loading up the cylinder with fuel. ZTime well spent.

Mike Clark

Busby · Aug 10, 2004 01:40 PM

#13 source
Bill;
I am currently running a 46LA in a TEOSASWKI,
11.75x3.6 Bolly, 5% Sig 20% oil with a dash of
Aero 1 additive ,Pa needle, stock venturi,4.5oz
Brodak uniflow narrow tank,64 FT lines and it flys
%5.5 to 5.6 sec laps, wind or no wind . Its a very honest
good flying setup . you just cant beat it for the bucks
and time involved, and if the motor goes south trash it
and get another.
To answer your question the 46 is a very good motor for
the money.I dont think you can honestly compare the two,
but for the money, effort andengine run iwould suggest
the 46 LA.
See you at Huntersville
Busby

Randy Powell · Aug 10, 2004 02:22 PM

#14 source
Bill,

Ask Carl Shoup about his LA46. Seems to run pretty much like an ST46...on steriods. But his isn't stock.

Tim Gee · Aug 12, 2004 07:54 AM

#16 source
Bill,

OS LA46s are invariably in good condition due to the un-ringed P&C and are more consistent than ST46s which commonly have tired rings (or even new standard ST rings which have poor metalurgy).

Fitted with a good well tensioned cast iron ring in a honed liner, an ST46 will out torque an LA easily and will swing a 13x5 and more. That's not a typo. 13x5 with 10% nitro pulling a 56oz 700 sq in model through the pattern 4 stroking all the way in a stiff breeze. A honed liner and a good ring is the key.

You can make rings quite easily if you have a lathe and heat treating tension into them isn't difficult but that's another topic.

Regards,

Bill Little · Aug 12, 2004 05:34 PM

#17 source
Thanks to all!
It seems that the LA either has more or less power/torque than the ST depending on who has it. hahaha
Y'all know how it is..... you feel comfortable with one thing but a time comes that you have to start looking for alternatives. I have the ST 46s, but they just ain't making no more, and OS is making the LA. I just wanted to know that if I switched engines, in the same ship, what to expect. Having witnessed quite a few LA 46 run, and very well at that, I am curious. But I just don't have the time to experiment AND fly.
Thanks fellas, I just am gonna have to break down and get one soon!
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

GLBahrman · Aug 12, 2004 07:03 PM

edited#18 source
Hi Bill,
You won't be disappointed. Really a fun motor and dead reliable. I don't know about others but mine goes from slobbering rich as I lean it out into a really sweet fast 4 stroke mode. Now this 4 stroke mode on my motor is very broad on the needle and last maybe another 1/2 to 3/4 of a turn of the needle before it hits the 2 cycle mode which makes it very easy to adjust. I do kinda like Steve Moon recommended. I lean it out until it hits the 2 cycle mode and then I back it off approx. 1/8 turn back into the 4 stroke mode and then I leave it for the day.

Kind of hard to answer your question of which makes more power because I think they are close. But also because I think my ST 46 runs better than most I've seen. Mine is not special or anything it just has good compression and the venturi recommended by Brett. Mine was shall we say, lack luster until the venturi change, 10% nitro min. and I found the prop my motor likes. Now it's a great runner and I love it. Before that, any LA 46 would of blown it off. A lot of people like me expect the ST 46 to be a good runner because of it's reputation but such is not the case. It needed to be fiddled with a little to bring it into it's own. Most of the problem was me and my lack of experience. Having said all of the above, the OS LA 46 is a strong runner right out of the box (I did add one head gasket) and requires little messing with. Grins !!

norvaldo · Aug 14, 2004 12:48 PM

#19 source
Although this post is about ST 46 vs. OS 46LA , i will post a general q. on the .46 LA. I actually got my second one today.
I have up until now been running it on a Profile Cardinal 46 oz with a Master 12x4 prop on 64' lines.
It is running in 2 stroke all the time with muffler pressure.
Still..The plane is too fast during the manouvers.
Now i will try a Zinger 11x5 and releasing at a slightly lower RPM.
Just wondering: Theoretically a 5" pitch should pull the plane 20% faster than a 4" pitch, which is the opposite of what i want.
So maybe a rich 2 stroke will do the trick.

Norvald Olsvold

MikeC · Aug 14, 2004 01:37 PM

#20 source
Hey Norv,
What are your lap times? How hot is you engine after your run?

With the LA46 flying at a two wet stroke and with a 12/4 prop I can imagine that you do have your hands full. If you engine is performing the way you like it to maybe longer lines may be the answer.

Mike Clark

norvaldo · Aug 14, 2004 01:44 PM

#21 source
Well i have not clocked, but i think theuy are under 5 sec.
I have this continous fear of loosing line tension on the wingower and overheads. I think this 12x4 Master is not the right propeller.
Today was a contest day, so i did not want to experiment too much.
I will give it a try with the lighter load 11x5 Zinger to see if it is better...
Norvald Olsvold

GLBahrman · Aug 14, 2004 02:32 PM

#22 source
>I think this 12x4 Master is not the right propeller.<


NORVALDO,
I would suggest you go back to the beginning of this thread and start reading from the beginning or maybe even print it out if it's easier for you to read. There are several props recommended for you to use that are successful. None of which are of the Master type. Do not try to reinvent the wheel. The work has been done. If you follow the setups and the props listed you will be successful. There may be other problems with your setup, but start with what has already been proven and work from there. Good Luck!!!

norvaldo · Aug 14, 2004 02:56 PM

#23 source
Yes..Thanks for the advice.
Btw. I just came across this article (page 3-6)

http://dkd.net/clmodels/acln/acln70.pdf

Norvald Olsvold

GLBahrman · Aug 14, 2004 04:17 PM

#24 source
>Yes..Thanks for the advice.
>Btw. I just came across this article (page 3-6)
>
>http://dkd.net/clmodels/acln/acln70.pdf
>
>Norvald Olsvold


Yes, It was printed in Stunt News (PAMPA) also.