Engines with mufflers work the same way. Most mufflers that come with our engines are too restrictive and choke away too much power. We can increase the size of the chamber or the exhaust outlet in order to bring back that lost power--within reason. At a certain point we begin to receive diminishing returns, but, if we were going for extreme quietness, that would be a huge muffler.
The first tube mufflers we got from Art for our 35 FP used the same size chamber he had been using on the Fox 35 and they didn't work well. Too restrictive. Increasing the length 1/4 inch made the day. With pipes the length is a determining factor, so increasing the volume (diameter) or opening the stinger can allow for more power.
We tried the 65 pipe on Matt's 61 at the advice of Billy Werwage and Randy Smith, and they were right. It did allow more power. It is a little larger diameter than the 61 pipe, but Matt's plane would take it. You might have noticed that not only are the newer pipes larger in diameter, but the engines are also getting noisier. The opening of the stinger has been increased to allow the exhaust to escape better. One thing you will need to watch is that little "rubber ducky" at the end. It will rob power. Some of the newer pipes that Billy is producing have the stinger coming out at an angle so you don't need to add that deflector. This, too, adds less restriction to the power of the engine.
My only question is, "If the 65 pipe improves the 61 engine by increasing the volume, is the 65 pipe now maybe too small for the 65 engine?" Of course, it depends on the size props you want to turn and so forth. You can now run a 14 inch 3-blader with either. And if you are running the smaller props or wanting more fuel efficiency, maybe the smaller pipe is still the way to go.
Leonard Neumann