OS 30 FS manifold?
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 12 of 12 known posts recovered
added: here is the link
http://www.clstunt.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=2984&forum=DCForumID1
Big Country Joe · Aug 13, 2004 04:40 PM
#2 sourceJoe Just
I guess my question is what those less than satisfactory results were.
One has to remember that these carbs were designed to run with muffler pressure, so the fuel draw may be less than optimal without pressure. The cool thing about using muffler pressure is that the engine can run in reverse, with the muffler becoming the carb, and the (real) carb becoming the exhaust. This can make a real mess in a tight cowl configuration. This is one good reason to use an electric starter!
The problem is unsteady rpm in level flight, on the ground, on the bench it will wander + or - a couple hundred rpm. and it won't hold a setting: some times it will go rich, sometimes it will go lean during a tank of fuel.
...and I thought the beauty of four strokes was the consistancy of runs...
Brett Buck · Aug 16, 2004 12:42 PM
#8 source>The problem is unsteady rpm in level flight, on the ground,
>on the bench it will wander + or - a couple hundred rpm. and
>it won't hold a setting: some times it will go rich,
>sometimes it will go lean during a tank of fuel.
>
>...and I thought the beauty of four strokes was the
>consistancy of runs...
Lots of people have noted this phenomenon.
The carb is probably the cause, and the solution is to use a regular venturi.
Which brings us full circle...
Brett
In actual fact, most of the guys who have played around with the smaller 4 strokes (40 and below) around here have had no problem with simply wiring the carb open. I also have never noted a problem while running them full throttle in RC applications (like surging or ....)
If he is having draw problems, I wonder what size prop he is using. An oversized prob reduces the airflow velocity through the carb and might cause fuel draw problems--if that is the problem.