>
>> I thought getting rid of the spyware would keep the PC
>>from crashing and slowing down to the point it had to be
>>restarted every two hours. But I find that spyware is not
>>necessary for that to happen.
>>
>> Brett
>
>I realize you are a Mac user. It seems the engineering
>schools prefer them. But, all pros and cons aside, My PC
>runs continually and I don't reboot it. Don't have to
>unless I am updating software. But I do use Norton
>Utilities, and have the spybot running constantly. If you
>have that much of a problem with a PC, there is something
>wrong (like some bad program lingering on, or a file
>missing, or something.)
Well, having been re-imaged about 10 times, replaced entirely 3 times, and under continual "professional" support, behind a firewall, I don't think it's a spyware issue. Particularly since the same thing happens with the classified machines - which aren't connected to the internet.
One significant difference is that there is a lot more going on in there than the standard MS "secretary's load" of applications. But it's always the MS applicaitons that bomb out - Outlook and Word being particularly crappy. We are warned against even firing up Exploder, even behind the firewall. Supposed to be using Netscape, but I use Mozilla since it's less bloated.
I have 5 different systems that I frequently use on a daily basis. In order of reliability:
VAX/VMS - completely bulletproof, no crashes aside from power outages in ~15 years
iBook G3/900 /Mac OS X - also never crashed, but is frequently power-cycled just because I want to turn it off frequently.
PowerMac 8600/300/Mac OS 8.6 - crashes occasionally, particularly running Netscape 4.79, maybe once every 6 months
Sun Blade/Sun server/Sun OS (Unix) - crashes or has to be restarted maybe once a month (must be the crappiest version of UNIX ever)
IBM Netvista P4/1.8Ghz/Windows2000 Pro - crashes or has to be rebooted due to dragging performance roughly every two hours, even if you just leave Outlook sitting there. Data loss frequent when using Word*. Never mind the things it just won't do properly, by crappy design.
For example, the exotic task of pasting figures into documents. Let's see, use postscript, figure doesn't appear unless you create a preview, but preview doesn't really match the printed version. Bitmap? Well, that the same, but it looks very poor. TIFF - swell, looks good - but why did my document just go from 120 K to 1.5 meg? Great, I'll save it - but wait, it says I am out of disk space. But I have 16 gig free. Must be a corrupted object, now I can spend the next hour figuring out which of the roughly 2000 Equation Editor objects might be corrupted. Oh, and I just noticed that the *original* document that I had previously saved is now wiped out.
Same thing on Mac. Click on figure, hit apple-c, go to new document, click where picture goes, click apple-v, move on with life. What format does it paste the document? Heck if I know, it looks right on the screen, and it looks the same when you print it out.
It's not just my machine - it happens to most of my cohorts, too. And it happened with previous NT system, too. It's junk - but unless you have a reference frame with which to compare, you won't know any better.