Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Scott Bair Article

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 9 of 9 known posts recovered

godzilla · Aug 19, 2004 09:04 AM

#0 source
Does anyone have a copy of the Scott Bair airplane design article?

The City Smasher

grzly23 · Aug 19, 2004 09:06 AM

#1 source
Go to the AMA website and access the MA archives for the August 1983 issue. Scott's article is there as a PDF file.

Tom McClain

Busby · Aug 19, 2004 09:24 AM

#2 source
You can also get a set of the plans as well as a reprint of the article. It is a totatly interesting concept.The 46 powered plane
at 43 oz looks like a freeflight.
Busby

phantomflier · Aug 19, 2004 02:25 PM

#6 source
> You can also get a set of the plans as well as a reprint of
>the article. It is a totatly interesting concept.The 46
>powered plane
>at 43 oz looks like a freeflight.
>Busby


The .84 powered plane at 48 oz looked the same. Don't think the wheels ever turned when it was launched.

godzilla · Aug 19, 2004 10:03 AM

#3 source
>Go to the AMA website and access the MA archives for the
>August 1983 issue. Scott's article is there as a PDF file.

Thanks,

Do you have a link?

How goes your PC plane?
Brad

The City Smasher

kdheath · Aug 19, 2004 12:17 PM

#5 source
>>Go to the AMA website and access the MA archives for the
>>August 1983 issue. Scott's article is there as a PDF file.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Do you have a link?
>
>How goes your PC plane?
>Brad

http://modelaircraft.org/templates/ama/

LeagueCityRalph · Aug 19, 2004 10:59 AM

#4 source
LAST EDITED ON Aug-19-04 AT 11:22 AM (CDT)
 
Also, it helps if you spell the author's name Scott "Baer".

Edit:
And while the Table of Contents correctly lists Page 72 as the start of the article, it actually shows up as Page 74 of the scanned-in archive.

I have no idea what's happening with that!

Ralph Wenzel

Mike_Ferguson · Aug 19, 2004 02:30 PM

#7 source
>Also, it helps if you spell the author's name Scott "Baer".
>
>Edit:
>And while the Table of Contents correctly lists Page 72 as
>the start of the article, it actually shows up as Page 74 of
>the scanned-in archive.
>
>I have no idea what's happening with that!

It counts the cover as page 1, and the inside of the cover as page 2.

LeagueCityRalph · Aug 19, 2004 02:51 PM

#8 source
> It counts the cover as page 1, and the inside of the cover as page 2.>

Yet then they start the actual page numbering at "1"!

Sort of like the "bad old days" in the early 70s when USAC shortened the Indy 500 to 450 miles (to save fuel) and then had the gall to proclaim that they were cancelling the "first" 50 miles, rather than the last 50!

Sometimes CYA doesn't refer to glue . . .

Ralph Wenzel