Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

My take on PAMPA & BRODAK

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 5 of 5 known posts recovered

Floyd · Sep 26, 2004 12:39 AM

edited#0 source
Leonard, I am not trying to bring up a closed topic here. I just think I ought to get a trophy for staying out of the commentary! But the topic was 100% no fun so it was easy.

One thing really bothered me, though. Now I don't want to put anybody down but a member who is apparently thought by many - including himself - to be Einstein II made this comment :

"""Oh PLEASE!. I think that Brodak Products are very helpful to the hobby and sport flying on some level. But the hobby was growing *wildly* before Brodak really took off. In fact it's more likely the other way around, if anything. Brodak products effect on serious stunt competition is fairly negligible.

As far as economic concerns go, Aero Products has been FAR more important to the health of the stunt event than Brodak products. That's not a ding on Brodak in any way, nor is it a political statement- aside from the paint and a few really nice kits (Vector 40, Allen's designs) it's just not his market.

John has done a lot of positive things, but really, some perspective!"""


Now, that is just not true. I remember well about fifteen years or so ago being there at the hobby shop and John (who I don't know and who doesn't know me) was telling me about how they were going to have a plane like the flight streak only his was to be the lightning streak. Boy, I though this is a loser business and I wondered what he was thinking. CL was near-death. These days people have to be able to buy stuff from a glossy color catalog from a real business which is what he finally provided.

Well, I was wrong about this business and despite what I view as a bit of high prices (only in comparison to RC stuff, not this cottage industry CL stuff) Brodak has had a very great effect in saving this hobby. It is a hobby you know, not a science or a career.

Now I think the hero worship on Brodak here is looney. But the first catalogs amazed me and I think he was clever to sell EVERYTHING needed for CL in the catalog like it was a huge warehouse when in fact it was just stuff sitting around the dusty little hobby shop. See, any guy with a halfway decent hobby shop could have done the same at the time. Most of those guys have folded by now.

Of course the smart guy who made such statements above will turn it all around to make me look stupid as always (with his focus on piddly details rather than meaning, a symptom of whatever his affliction is) but I do not care - as always. Lack of shame is a real virtue in its way. I do not engage in any fighting here anymore so don't even try to bait me. Send private EMail.

FLOYD CUMMINS

Floyd · Sep 26, 2004 01:02 AM

edited#1 source
And another thing, some men here ought to be ashamed of their snobby tone they took on as being "serious flyers." Come on, you are flying a toy plane here. You can spend 2000 hours building it and have a Vulcan theorize about this or that matter of physics regarding it and even paint it green and get a immam to come and bless it but it is still a toy plane.

Don't you put me or anybody else down like that. Shame on you. You are "serious" in your own minds only. Personally I have found your flying and especially the planes you build to lack personality and your ways on here to be lacking in basic humanity. I am not referring to nice or mean but rather to people being hoightytoighty and pompous over little airplanes. I suppose I should not expect much more from people who are obsessed but still..... (Adressed only to the few who know darn well who they are.)

Now I don't claim to be anything but a regular jerk and Matilde informs me my assessment is correct but at least I don't hide behind a facade of being so darn sophisticated on a matter like - model planes!

LNeumann · Sep 27, 2004 12:26 PM

#4 source
Floyd, the interesting thing about your comment is that it was locked down before I even had a chance to read it for the first time. Now, there are two people who have that right and privilege--myself as owner of the board, and Bob Kruger who has helped immeasurably with it, and without whose aid, or someone like him, it would probably not be here. Bob normally doesn't mess with things when I am around, but he apparently saw your post late in the evening and promptly locked it down. There was a reason. And I am just now getting time to respond.

I wish we could get into these discussions without all the backbiting and attempts to run individuals down. Had you done that, there would have been no problem in keeping this post active. First you made your comments about the person with which you disagree. Then you felt compelled to defend Brodak for his CL products. The former were done in a manner that is inappropriate, and the latter is not the issue, and never was. I, too, applaud John for supplying us with the things that he does. But this was a business venture as well as a hobby he loves. He wouldn't do it if he didn't feel he could make a go of it. Still, the comments about the hobby being alive and well before John came along with Brodak Manufacturing are true. The hobby was growing before, or I don't think John would have stepped in. Before John there was SIG and RSM and others supplying the same type of products he is. Oh, and they had their catalogues, too. Did John bring out a nice line of kits? Yes, he did. But the advent of the ARF versions of these very same models will, I fear, have a serious impact upon the kits of those designs. Just like SIG did with some of theirs, we may find that certain models of the Brodak kits will be "retired" once the demand dries up.

Whenever a new gas station comes into town, we don't find more people buying gas. We find others that will sell less as a result. And ultimately there will be gas stations closing. It may not be quite the same in the hobby business. But every flyer only needs a certain number of airplanes. And whether it is this one, or that one, whether he builds it or buys an ARF, when he acquires the number he feels he needs, he will quit buying. One side gains. One side loses.

The comment concerning Randy Smith had to do with competition. Perhaps you, as a sports flyer, don't understand that, but it was competition that brought this hobby back to life. PAMPA is competition. New events were developed by PAMPA for the lesser skilled flyers to give them an opportunity to compete with their peers and in the hope that they might, therefore, improve. Randy and others provided products that were used by flyers in these events along with the sports flyer as well.

Now who is more important as a supplier and developer of materials for our event is immaterial. But we need to separate John's accomplishments in manufacturing and distribution from his role as president of PAMPA. The key concern in this whole matter is competition. PAMPA is competition. The key concern here was and is John's role in serving as President of PAMPA which is the SIG for control line precision aerobatics with the AMA. I have not had a chance to talk with John yet as of this writing. He is currently out of town. I will speak with him later and will make no further comments until then.

Your last comments, however, were really out of order. You make your comments about the "snobby tone of the serious stunt flyer." And then you speak as if we shouldn't be serious about the event at all.

I have, over the years, found the serious stunt flyers very helpful. With rare exception would I ever call anyone snobbish. They will go out of their way to help you beat them, even to the point of helping you to repair a plane that was crashed so you can get it back in the air in time to win. You ask them questions, and they willingly answer. Their presence on this board makes it the great board that it is. It is only as good as those who participate. Without them and their willingness to answer your questions, this board would be nothing.

As to the serious nature, I believe that we are allowed to get serious about our competition. We had better be serious about our competition. Check with the NASCAR drivers. Check with the professional baseball or football players. See if they might not be serious about the "game" they play. The only difference here is, they get paid for it and we don't. But PAMPA is competition. It takes a serious commitment to learn to build and fly these things we call "toy airplanes" with the degree of perfection it takes to fly them at any level of competition. That goes for Beginner as well as Expert. We ARE serious about what we do. Some may enter a contest just to have fun. But if you desire to win, or even to improve, you had better get serious.

PAMPA was formed for the purpose of overseeing competition--especially at the Nats and FAI trials. A magazine was formed, produced by volunteers with contributions by volunteers. Others, when they saw the magazine that was being produced, "wanted in". Let's face it, the vast majority of sports flyers and people living outside the US who have joined PAMPA did so for one reason only: "Stunt News"! And your "dues" go primarily to the cost of producing this excellent magazine. And if the sports flyers now begin to "flex their muscles" because they feel they are in the majority and attempt to lead PAMPA in any other direction than its constituted purpose which is competition, everyone will lose. The magazine is supported by those who compete. Without them and their volunteer contributions it would cease to exist. And without the magazine, you, as sports flyers, will no longer have a reason to be a part of PAMPA.

One of John's stated goals was to bring about a growth in membership of PAMPA. That will not happen if you try to divorce yourself from those who compete…or shove them aside as inconsequential. PAMPA welcomed the sports flyer so he could learn to enjoy this hobby better. Let's make sure the sports flyer does not shoot himself in the foot by alienating the "serious" competition flyer that is what PAMPA is all about.

tomB · Sep 26, 2004 06:30 AM

#2 source
Good points, and I made the same ones at the time. A little perspective was needed.

That same individual kept emphasizing that NO conlict of interest was involved, so I gave up on the whole issue anyway. Whatever the issue was, they wanted to keep it private, but then argue it on a public forum. This way, everyone could see the rancor (and participate), but everyone was invalidated because "you don't know what you're talking about."

It left a great impression on me about PAMPA.

Dick Fowler · Sep 26, 2004 07:56 AM

#3 source
Gee Guys.... I don't understand the necessity of having to attack another person on this forum for expressing their opinions. Please re-read our host Leonard's post.

I know I'm not the self appointed policeman of this forum but why does it always degrade into this? The PAMPA discussion was mildly important to me and I still have unanswered questions but this sort of conduct shut it all down before I could get the answers I was seeking.