Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

LEGACY

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 12 of 12 known posts recovered

Dr Spark · Oct 05, 2004 04:51 PM

#0 source
I have only nice things to say about the Brodak LEGACY kit. At last, I have a model which goes exactly where pointed, and does everything with no nonsense. Now, its pilot only needs more practice (maybe many years). Any comments?

"This is Dr. Spark, and I approve this message."

Ryan Nau · Oct 05, 2004 05:25 PM

#1 source
Thats how the old legacy I had was. Great flying airplane. I have one just about ready to silk span now that I started building more on since last year. I'm putting a PA 61 in this one. My old one had a Super Tigre 60.

mcm · Oct 05, 2004 06:02 PM

#2 source
I got back into this hobby about 4 years ago because a LHS had one of these kits on the shelf. I wonder if I would have stuck with it this time if it weren't the absolute best c/l plane I've ever had. It made it a year and a half before I tried to dig a ditch. I have a second one that flies just a great as the first one. Absolute great plane.

Randy Powell · Oct 05, 2004 06:22 PM

#3 source
mcm,

Have to say I love the Orange one. To use Larry Cunningham's words, it just drips Zen. One of the cooler planes I've seen. Makes me want to build one.

Spark,

So, are you coming to Salem this weekend?

MikeC · Oct 05, 2004 09:41 PM

#4 source
What kind of finish, how much does it weigh and what kind of power is up front. I have just started mine and plan for a T&L ST60 up front. I have had a few flyers that suggested I not use the ST60. This 60 flew a 70 ounce Magnum about five years ago without breathing hard & without any trouble. I need input.

"Needless mistakes should be a part of the past."

Mike Clark

Bill Little · Oct 06, 2004 02:05 PM

#5 source
Tom Lay's STs have always run real well for me, and the others I have seen fly them. I think the 60 would do a great job in there, especially since you already have it and have used it.
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

cwmcmillin · Oct 06, 2004 07:55 PM

#7 source
I agree with Bill.
The T&L 60 is hard to beat for simple set-up and like he said, you already know that engine.
You can experiment with other engines on another ship, while practice and contest flying with a known engine and model.
Chris...

mcm · Oct 06, 2004 07:53 PM

#6 source
My first one (yellow and purple, with turtle deck) was powered by a Fox .46 BB abc. Lots of power for a .46, that engine. Was best with a 11x5 three-blade carbon prop. Don't know the weight, but it was completely covered with monokote (I doped when I was young, but the guy at the RC hobby shop told me no one does that anymore--boy was he wrong) and I think it was a few ounces lighter than my latest, which is 62.5. It is powered by a Stalker .55 rear exhaust. It is covered with oz cover and painted with dupont Centari Acrylic Enamel with glossy catalyst. No clear needed with acrylic enamels. Starting to get a little hangar rash on the wingtips from carrying it, though.

Dr Spark · Oct 07, 2004 03:22 PM

#8 source
LEGACY flies quite well with a Tom Lay S.T. 51. Mine is lighter than normal, because I "bashed" the kit and used lighter construction (no fancy cowling, no balsa blocks).

I hope I can attach a picture! Also, note that I stole the B. Buck paint scheme!

\Dr. Spark

Randy Powell · Oct 07, 2004 03:26 PM

#9 source
Dr.

I'm pretty sure that Brett didn't invent it. Looks good. I expect to see it at Salem this weekend.

Randy

Ion Muniz · Oct 07, 2004 03:44 PM

#10 source
I do the same thing, instead of enclosing the engine inside a cowling I let the head stick out, and I also keep the tuned pipe "in the breeze".

Less hassle, less wheight ad more guaranteed cooling.

Ion

TigreST · Oct 07, 2004 08:16 PM

#11 source
Mitch,
Nice work!!

Tony