GravityWell · Oct 10, 2004 06:49 PM
#0 source“I have never crashed, but I have proven the theory that gravity sucks!”
Glenn Reach
[email protected]
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 4 of 4 known posts recovered
“I have never crashed, but I have proven the theory that gravity sucks!”
Glenn Reach
[email protected]
First, the material you find in the local hardware store, and especially the extruded shapes, are very soft. They won't cut and hold threads very well and will bend pretty easily. This may or may not be a big issue. THe softness may indeed help with issue two.
Second, the vibration damping characteristics of the wood mounts are better in my opinion. You might get by with an aluminum tube if it were filled with some material (like wood).
From a weight standpoint, I would say you might be a little better off than with maple but the engine mount area is not a place to scrimp.
One thing I do to my maple bearers is to channel them so they become a "c" shape just aft of the engine mounting area. I also drill them in the same area. The C is open to the inside of the plane. THe holes, about the same size ast the slot, are horizontal and spaced about 2.0 diameters apart. In the top view, the top and bottom of the C channel are tapered for about 3-4 inches from the aft end.
The balsa cross grain pieces are keyed into the open faces of the C channel.
THis assembly is very stiff, and pretty light. I'm not sure there would be any weight savings, if any, for an aluminum tube. And then there is the attachment problem. Special techniques are required to bond aluminum since it oxidizes to a clearcoat almost instantaneously on air contact.
JMHO
Curt
John Wright
A few points.
1 Price. Is the extruded Al cheaper?
2 Springiness. I don't have much experience of al in this type of application but generally the extrudedd material is quite soft.
3 Deflection. Soft Al deflects. So does wood but the internal damping available from good wood cannot be underestimated.
One of the measures used in structural steel design—different material, I know—is a deflection limit of span divided by a number. For domestic floor framing span/250 or span/300 is fine. For steel, span/650—a much smaller number—is too springy. Although it is currently hard to justify the figure by theory, span/750 works well.
I would not bother.
Cheers, Geoff