Nice work, Mike! I see you have built the original published version of the ship, which had diagonal balsa sheet planking on the aft. Several people reported problems with twists and distortions after clear dope was applied. Subsequently, I went to the 1/64" plywood fuse side planking, and it solves ALL problems!
However, your glassing solution is probably a good approach. On previous profile fuselages, I glassed them with .5 oz (using nitrate dope as the binder), very lightly sanded, and then covered with medium silkspan. I'm not sure this is absolutely as strong as it might be with a good epoxy binder, but it works pretty well, and there are no problems getting color dope to stick over it.
If you have a choice, start out with an OS .46 LA for this ship. Like the profile Cardinal, it has a large thick wing with lots of drag. The original design was for the OS .40 FP, but I also used an ST .51 on it with good results.
As for weights, 254g is around 9.5 ounces, which is I'm sure heavier than many profile fuselages. I have my previous prototype 1/64" plywood planked version here, and it is 214g (7.9 ounces). That fuselage is slightly taller and about 3/4" longer in the hinge line to hinge line measurement. It still has to be rounded, but it has no rudder glued on. There's also another difference, the fuselage balsa sheet is now 3/8" thick instead of 1/2" thick..
A valid complaint I get about the Mo'Best is that it is slightly too large for a .40 size profile ship. And profile fuselages tend to be heavier than well designed built-up fuselages, there is simply LESS material involved. And an extra light profile fuselage with a weak nose is almost a recipe for a crappy engine run, which makes the extra weight less an issue.
The Mo'Best wingspan is 58".. It's rather large for a profile.
Don't forget, I got into the "More is Better, so even More is Best" mode in this design, and perhaps it did end up slightly too big. My friend Robert Compton has built them in the 44-46 ounce range, and they fly well. And I've built pachyderms weighing another 10 ounces (they were PRETTY!) which also flew pretty well, again the wing volume makes it possible. But they are draggy, and good power is required.
Funny you should mention a wing only kit.. The full fuselage version of the Mo'Best is called the Mo'Beast and only differs in the fuselage.. John Brodak will be marketing the profile kit, after I build a couple of fresh Mo'Bests, I'll just want the kits minus the profile fuselage parts too! Maybe we can ask him.
Good luck with your ship!
[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]
"I have no sceptre, but I have a pen." -Voltaire