Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Fine Tuning ARF

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 25 of 25 known posts recovered

Giffy · Nov 02, 2004 12:59 AM

#0 source
I'm having a good bit of difficulty with my ARF Cardinal. It didn't fly good right off the bench. I expected to do some trimming but, havn't got it good yet. I'll reserve judgement for a while longer since this is my first big stunt ship with flaps and, there's no one helping me right now, save this site.

I could use some basic set-up info like overall weight, line rake, tip weight, handle spacing and, most of all, elevator and flap travel. I'm not sure I hooked up the push rods to the right control horn holes.

I think I could shorten the nose. It would get into manuvers slow then turn real tight so, I moved the engine and tank back and added tail weight. It balanced 3" back from the LE which improved it alot.

It also has a rather sharp LE. Is this the way Windy designed it or, was it too labor intensive to round it off?

It's darty like it has a mind of it's own. It's hard to get it to go where I want it to go. It's easy to over control and stall in manuvers like it has too much travel or, is too fast on the controls. The elevator goes 25 degrees up and 30 down with the push rod in the middle hole on the elevator (I guess they made the primary push rod too long). I'd like to try the longest hole on the elevator horn but, will this give me too much flap and not enough elevator?

It came with a small wing warp. I tweeked the flaps but could still see the top of the wing in flight. I twisted the wing and tightened the monokote but went a tiny bit too far so, I tweeked the flaps the other way (quick field fix). If there's any wind the wings seem to jump around alot on the roll axis, if that makes sense.

I can see the bottom of the wing during inside loops and, It gets real light on the lines at the top of outside loops even with good air speed.

At this point I feel like the plane is flying me. Any help for a rookie?


Thanks,
Giffy

greg hart · Nov 02, 2004 03:41 AM

#1 source
One rookie to anouther. Find a helpfull mentor to go flying with before you crash it. I have a arf Cardianal and from past experience don't fly to many flights or to many adjustments in trimming at one day of flying.

Greg Hart <><

peabody · Nov 02, 2004 06:02 AM

#2 source
Giffy...
My blush is that you have the bellcrank to flap or flap to elevator linkage screwed up in some way.
What part of the Country are you located.....there ought to be someone near that can give some sage advice.
I would suggest that the leadouts be set that the front one is about an inch from the front of the slat.
The elevator/flap set up should be so that they are both DEAD LEVEL at some point (the bellcrank to flap should be set for equal movement). The ratio should be one to one...in other words, if the flap to elevator pushrod is in the top hole of the flap horn, it should be in the bottom hole of the elevator horn.
I hope this helps.

See Ya

Peabody

cwmcmillin · Nov 05, 2004 03:41 PM

#15 source
These new ARFs have SLATS?
Chris...

david eyskens · Nov 05, 2004 04:01 PM

#16 source
Chris, Whats up w/SLATS?????DAVID

elmores · Nov 02, 2004 06:18 AM

#3 source

Tony

jehold66203 · Nov 02, 2004 12:09 PM

#5 source
I was chewed out royally for tweaking flaps to get level wing. I was told if the wing is straight and has enough tip weight, add an adjustable tab to outboard wing. I had my ARF Nobler chasing me several times by tweaking the flaps. DOC

Alan Hahn · Nov 02, 2004 02:17 PM

#6 source
Tweaking the flaps was, according to George Aldrich, one of the many advantages of a flapped plane (from his Nobler article which was reprinted in Stunt News a few years back.

There is certainly nothing wrong in this--I am assuming a mild tweak of course!

Alan

Brett Buck · Nov 04, 2004 12:34 AM

#11 source
>I was chewed out royally for tweaking flaps to get level
>wing. I was told if the wing is straight and has enough tip
>weight, add an adjustable tab to outboard wing.

Well, if you need tip weight, then tweaking won't help. But if you need to tweak it, you need to tweak it. I don't know who "chewed you out" - but they had better come "chew me out" too, since I have absolutely no compunction about it.

Brett

LNeumann · Nov 02, 2004 10:12 AM

#4 source
You mention handle spacing, but did not mention how everything else is set up. 30 degrees up and down is absolutely as much as you want to go. But you should never need to use that much. In other words, narrow the spacing so that when you give maximum movement with your hand you do not give full movement with the controls. Don't ever have so much that you hang it on one line.

The wider the handle spacing the jumpier the airplane is going to be. And the better you get, the more sensitive you will get to this fact. I always recommend getting a good, adjustable handle. This is a life time investment, and having more than one handle for more than one plane is also a good idea. Then set up each handle for the plane you are flying.

Now, what was mentioned above in the other posts is good advice. You want enough tip weight so the plane flies level upright and inverted or with the outer wingtip "slightly" down (to begin with). Set the center of the leadouts about an inch behind the center of gravity to begin with. Adjust from there (small increments at a time.) Whenever you make an adjustment, see if it helped or hurt. If it hurt go back. If it helped, this is your new "square one." Unless the set up is a mess, do one adjustment at a time, and do not be afraid to fly straight and level just to fly it out if someting is wrong. One of the biggest causes of crashes is people doing things they shouldn't do before they get the plane in proper trim.

What kind of handle are you using, by the way, and what is the handle spacing?

Leonard Neumann

Giffy · Nov 03, 2004 10:01 PM

#7 source
Handle is a 4" ezjust hot rock, I just like the feel of it. I'll have to get some plywood and make a real stunt handle for closer spacing.

If I want to limit the travel of the controls, is it ok to put stops on the push rod that will hit the fairlead or, should I put stops on the lead outs?

I guess it would de-sensitize and reduce travel if I made longer control horns for flaps and elevator.

Must get new lines. Part of the problem might be I've been flying on .018" lines. Is there a big difference with .015" lines?


Thanks,
Giffy

Steve Helmick · Nov 03, 2004 10:20 PM

#8 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-04-04 AT 00:45 AM (CDT)
 
.015 vs. .018 is .003", about the thickness of a piece of paper. But if you consider, it's also a 20% increase, and it's round, so the weight is much more than 20% increased. Yes, it's a lot. But if the power is adequate, it's not a big deal if you adjust for it; a bit more tip weight, and back a bit more on the tip guide. That said, get a new set of lines, ASAP. I would recommend getting a shiny silver line over the bronzed ones, for visibility "in the pits" on grass or pavement. RSM carries bulk spools of 1,000' for about the price of 2.5 sets of lines on a too small spool. "Hello, RSM?" Duh!

Just get a stunt handle. Ted Fancher's handle or Tom Morris' handle would be dandy. You might order a set of lines from Tom, and take care of both issues with one check. No point to making new control horns at this stage. Print out the trim flow chart that Tony posted! Steve

Jerry_Raimo · Nov 04, 2004 12:21 AM

#9 source
>.015 vs. .018 is .003", about the thickness of a piece of
>paper. But if you consider, it's also a 20%, and it's round,
>so the weight is much more than 20% increased. Yes, it's a
>lot. But if the power is adequate, it's not a big deal if
>you adjust for it; a bit more tip weight, and back a bit
>more on the tip guide. That said, get a new set of lines,
>ASAP. I would recommend getting a shiny silver line over the
>bronzed ones, for visibility "in the pits" on grass or
>pavement. RSM carries bulk spools of 1,000' for about the
>price of 2.5 sets of lines on a too small spool. "Hello,
>RSM?" Duh!
>
>Just get a stunt handle. Ted Fancher's handle or Tom Morris'
>handle would be dandy. You might order a set of lines from
>Tom, and take care of both issues with one check. No point
>to making new control horns at this stage. Print out the
>trim flow chart that Tony posted! Steve
>


What engine and prop are you running ? The two cardinals I have seen at my club are both running LA 46's and both pilots really like their set-up. You need .018 lines if you are running a 46. .015 lines are for .40 or less. Sometimes a bigger prop (like a 12-4) on the LA 46 can help stabilize a plane similar to adding tailweight or narrowing the handle. I run a Zinger 12-4 on a LA 46 on a custom built profile similar the Cardinal in Size and really like that setup.

Jerry Raimo

Steve Helmick · Nov 04, 2004 12:30 AM

#10 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-04-04 AT 00:49 AM (CDT)
 
Giffy's running a .40LA. Someplace, there's another thread about the problem's he's having with it (also), but I can't find it. Un-trimmed model with a bad running engine...I don't like the chances. I sent Giffy a "PM", suggesting a few things to look at, and to urge caution. Haven't heard back..."Mo'm back, Giffmon!" Steve

Edit: The other thread (I can't find) is "NVA Range" Topic #11109

V12 · Nov 05, 2004 11:07 AM

#12 source
Giffy - I don't know if you have your Cardinal sorted out as yet but here is some information from an earlier post I made about the prototype.

"To add a bit more data - I went home and checked the prototype for some numbers.
Regarding push rod locations:
Inner hole on bellcrank to middle hole of flap horn.
Upper hole on flap horn to upper hole of elevator horn.
Other factors
Balance right at aft edge of L/E planking
About one-half ounce tip weight
Around one degree engine offset and a bit more on the rudder.

(added today - I forgot to mention the leadout guide position. I hung the plane by the leadouts and set them such that the nose was just barely pointing downward - maybe 2 or 3 degrees.
Approximately 1/4" total elevator free play.
Also, I have decided to leave the OS .40 4 stroke engine in it. It is a perfect setup for the flying I like to do and it's unbelievably quiet. )

I repeatedly brought the prototype to the field and left it out for anyone and everyone to fly - it was flown by everyone from beginners to top level experts. There were days when it flew continuously for three or four hours. Most of the flights were with the LA .46, on 63 foot lines, Hot-Rock handle. We also flew it with an ENYA .45, a Brodak .40, an OS .40 4S, and a Magnum .40.
I did the same at the Brodak Fly-in - offered it to anyone wanting to enter it and many took me up on it - It did quite well.
The most prevalent suggestion was to add more tail weight.
Hope this helps.
Bob Z.
ps - how about some others sharing experiences and suggestions."

Giffy · Nov 05, 2004 11:53 AM

#13 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-05-04 AT 11:56 AM (CDT)
 
I made a few small changes but, it's been very windy here. Thanks for the info.

I drilled the control horn out but didn't know how far to go with the free play. I'll check that today.

I guess the push rod connecting the flaps and elevator should be in the same control horn hole front and back for a 1:1 ratio. Mine is in the middle hole on both and, the push rod from the bellcrank is in the top hole on the flap horn. The only difference I can figure is my set up is less sensitive with less travel which I like. Even so I have at least 25 degrees travel each way which is too much with my hot rock handle. Maybe the prototype has a larger bellcrank than mine.

My LA .40 has been lightened by about 1 ounce, I use a wood prop and a tongue muffler, 3 ounce tank and, everything is pushed back far as it will go. With a little tail weight it balances the recomended 3" back from the leading edge with no fuel. Either I have the lightest ARF Cardinal ever made or, you guys are adding alot more tail weight than me.

I'm going to a standard muffler, a 4 ounce tank and a plastic prop. I don't want to add lead to the tail so, I'm going to shorten the nose about 3/4".

Hope the wind dies down for Sunday.


Thanks,
Giffy

Alan Hahn · Nov 05, 2004 02:50 PM

#14 source
I hate to ask this question (maybe I anticipate the answer!), but where do the instructions say to put the linkages? It does sound like you have just slowed down the control system (by having the bellcrank to flap horn connected to the uppermost hole). I have a vague memory that someone had mentioned that was the standard hookup for the Brodak Cardinal Kit.

Alan

Giffy · Nov 05, 2004 06:29 PM

#17 source
I couldn't find anything about it in the instructions. I just copied what was on the plans of the Tanger kit I'm building.

For anyone building this ARF, I suggest going all over the wing with an iron. The covering on mine keeps comming loose in different places.

Giff

LeagueCityRalph · Nov 05, 2004 07:22 PM

#18 source
I'm about 80% done with a Cardinal ARF. Linkages are whatever is standard on the bellcrank to middle hole on flap horn.

I made up a fiberglass pushrod with a piece of the ARF-included 3/32" rod and a 4-40 Hanger9 Ball Link on the Elevator end so I can adjust relative neutral. I've read that the Rocket City Ball Link is superior but can't find them. This pushrod goes outer flap horn to outer elevator horn.

The only other change I made was to use Monokote hinges rather than the Mylar/CyA hinges supplied.

Without engine/tank/prop/spinner, it weighs 31 oz., and I have no idea how this compares. Total dry weight should be around 43 oz. with a Brodak .40, and ought to perform at least OK.

It's curious, but I need to put 1/16" shims under the engine to center it in the nose ring. Anyone else noticed this? Should they have been supplied parts?

Ralph Wenzel

Giffy · Nov 05, 2004 09:32 PM

#19 source
How did you determine the primary push rod should go to the middle hole on the flap bellcrank? Doesn't this make the controls faster/more sensitive?

I've never used a ball link, how do you get free play in the elevator?

I just cut my nose ring off. I guess I just don't get the whole nose ring thing, what are they for?

Giff

LeagueCityRalph · Nov 06, 2004 08:27 AM

#20 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-06-04 AT 08:28 AM (CDT)
 
>How did you determine the primary push rod should go to the
>middle hole on the flap bellcrank? Doesn't this make the
>controls faster/more sensitive?

Yes, moving the primary pushrod to the middle hole makes the controls faster and increases throw. With the pushrod in the outer hole, there was only about ±15° of deflection, which seemed way too little.

>I've never used a ball link, how do you get free play in the
>elevator?

My first time with a ball link. Right now, there's no free play. If it seems necessary, I can ream out the hole in the flap horn end a bit. BTW, don't try to put the ball link at the flap end; there will be interference with the primary pushrod which will limit deflection. Guess how I learned this!

>I just cut my nose ring off. I guess I just don't get the
>whole nose ring thing, what are they for?

Well, on a full-bodied plane the plywood ring gives you a hard surface to finish and flair in the spinner. I presume the same purpose is served with a profile. And I had to epoxy mine back on, 'cause it was broken off in transit.

Ralph Wenzel

Giffy · Nov 06, 2004 02:58 PM

#21 source
Wow, my primary push rod is in the top hole on the flap horn and I'm getting 25+ degrees tralvel each way on the elevator. Now I know something is up with the bellcrank. I think I can compensate with handle spacing for now.

Anyway, I did some checking and found I've got about 2 degrees of in thrust. I had the engine pushed all the way back in those funky motor mounts. this made them squeeze the front more than the back due to flexing of the clamping bars. Also easy to get up or down thrust if you don't check it before torquing. These things just barely hold the engine tight enough, I'm getting rid of them.

Darn, windy again today.


Giffy

GLBahrman · Nov 06, 2004 03:35 PM

#22 source
>Wow, my primary push rod is in the top hole on the flap horn
>and I'm getting 25+ degrees tralvel each way on the
>elevator. Now I know something is up with the bellcrank. I
>think I can compensate with handle spacing for now.

Giffy,
That sounds good to me. I set mine up at 1 to 1 top hole on the flap gives me 30 degee flap travel, more than that is not beneficial.

Greg L. Bahrman

njsupertigre · Nov 07, 2004 11:44 AM

#23 source
njsupertigre
Giffy,
Give me a call and i'll get a hold of Ski Dombrosky and get him to come out flying with us. He can watch a plane fly and tell you what
is wrong. He sure helped me with a couple of my planes.
Have to get you ready for Brodaks next year.
Bill Mazzoni

Giffy · Nov 11, 2004 07:59 PM

#24 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-11-04 AT 08:12 PM (CST)
 
I have to weight this Cardinal because, I think I got lucky and got a light one.

Well I took the plunge and cut 3/4" off the nose, cut out the spreader behind the engine and moved the engine all the way back. I added a plastic spinner cone and, a friend found a nice 11-4 rev-up wood for me. With a larger (4oz) tank it balances just right with no tail weight.

Originally I thought I could move the engine back enough to use the OEM muffler but, can't get it back far enough and have room for the tank. Wow, that muffler weights 3 ounces so, I have to use the tongue muffler to make it fly right.

Also got rid of that innovative motor mount and went with through bolts and blind nuts. Those mounting straps were pinching the engine bearers more in the front and giving me in-thrust! I added some of those plastic strips to give it 2 degrees of out thrust.

I set the lead outs 1" behind the CG as suggested. I got some .015" x 65' lines and a good handle from Dick Byron.

Wow, did this plane come to life, it flys great. It's amazing the little things that make a difference. I can honestly say now that the pilot is the limiting factor.

The only thing I need to know is how many flights can I put on this thing before I start to worry about the leadouts breaking off the bellcrank? I've got about 20 flights on it so, far.

Thanks to all who helped, can't wait for Brodaks next year.


Giffy