Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

My thought on ARFS

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 39 of 39 known posts recovered

Sparky12366 · Nov 18, 2004 10:53 PM

#0 source

When I decided to get back into this hobby I bought a arf Nobler. I flew it exactly 6 flights and hung it up. Some people say they fly as well as a builder plane. I didn't think so. The point is if your not a builder of planes and want to get into the hobby then so be it.

I have seen on this board many discussions about rule changes and I for one don't care one way or the other. I will always build the planes I fly. I my opinion the biggest enjoyment come from the satisfaction of seeing a product that I created come to life. I think the biggest problem with the kids today is instant gratification. When I was taught this hobby it was part of the fun to create. I can remember sitting in High School waiting to get home to sand and now nothing has changed only I'm at work. So for now let the new comers fly ARFS and maybe just maybe they'll come around to the best part of the hobby.

Just my opinion.

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

LNeumann · Nov 18, 2004 11:07 PM

#1 source
>(snip)So for now let the new comers fly ARFS and maybe
>just maybe they'll come around to the best part of the hobby.
>
>Just my opinion.

The problem is, the new comers can't fly ARFS because...they can't fly. Even if someone can fly basic stuff and uses the ARF to learn maneuvers or to fly the pattern, he is going to crash. Now, he either junks it and buys another. He won't do that very long. Or he learns to repair it. Now he has to learn how to build before he even built something. And he has no plans to go by or knowledge of structure or...

In the RC field you can fly high and you can learn with somebody tied to you with a buddy box. Here you are on your own.

Methinks most ARFS are being bought by the sport flyers who were just wanting another plane or someone wanting an engine test bed. A few might want a new plane quick for a contest. But I don't see this as the magic elixer to get new people into the hobby.

Leonard Neumann

Sparky12366 · Nov 18, 2004 11:12 PM

#2 source
>>(snip)>
> But I don't see this as the magic elixer to get new people
>into the hobby.

Agreed but if I see some one new (and I have) I try to help.

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

Steve Hulse · Nov 18, 2004 11:31 PM

#3 source
Leonard,
My buddy Jack, just started flying a few months back. Started with a Flightstreak ARF. He crashed it, which resulted in a cracked Fuse at the doublers. He glued it back with ca. and was right back out flying. His 12 year old daughter went out with him and liked it and continues to fly that same Flightstreak. It has been broken and repaired probably five or six times including last Sunday. Thanks to ca glue, it's again ready for next Sunday. Jack has since wrecked and repaired repeatedly, a Nobler ARF. He also has a very nice used Cardinal, another Nobler ARF, a Cardinal ARF and a back-up Flightstreak ARF for his daughter for when the old one finally makes the toothpick farm. I printed out the beginner stunt patern from Eric's RSM web site and gave it to jacks daughter. He told me this morning that she has it on her bedroom wall, has been studying it and says she can do it. She is the quarterback for her school's football team. You should see her fly that Flightstreak. She flies with absolute authority over that battered plane and refuses to fly the new one. She is going to win beginner at the next Knight's Joust. Jack doesn't have time to build planes due to work and says if not for the ARF's, he would have never even gotten started. He actually told me that. I wish I could post video of his daughter flying. She has the tiger by the tail.

Steve Hulse

T.Durrill · Nov 19, 2004 12:50 AM

#4 source
Steve,

Great story!

T.Durrill

Fix_it · Nov 19, 2004 01:26 AM

#5 source
Tell that girl to keep on going! With the right coach and mentor she may pilot the 1st manned mission to Mars! ( unless my boy manages to get there first!)

Bill Heher
If it's broke, fix it.
If it aint broke - let me see it for a minute.

Jim Pollock · Nov 19, 2004 05:29 AM

#8 source
Len,

Absolutely to all you say, but in my case, I plan on getting an ARF Smoothie for nothing more than having an instant OTS plane. I have a Viking on hand to build, but the ARF is much easier for an "Apartment" dweller to put into action.


Jim Pollock

jim ivey · Nov 19, 2004 02:18 AM

#6 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 01:30 PM (CST)
 
u saw what i had to say....let em fly em in competion they aint gonna win anyway...but to make it fair to builder flyers deduct builder points(usta be about 50) well u could give em 10 if they did a real neat job of assembly 5 if so-so and 0 if glue slopped all over. .... jim

wcrane · Nov 19, 2004 03:45 AM

#7 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 04:00 AM (CST)
 
For what I WISH were the last time, the rules already have a points deduction for not building the model yourself, it's called APPEARANCE POINTS. You didn't build it, you don't get'em. I STILL do not see what the problem is in understanding this rule.

If you fly over 8 minutes, do you get your pattern points?

If you fly 2 loops instead of 3 do you get 40 points for inside loops?

From somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane
AMA 6733

jim ivey · Nov 19, 2004 02:14 PM

#18 source
i didnt know that they still had that rule...the way it was...it was never enforced...you could protest someones airplane if u wanted...but if u raised to much of a fuss you would just get disqualified..i know all about that(1961 aysc @ th nats)...and furthermore...just how would u go about KNOWING someone did or didnt build their own airplane?...other than an obvious ARF...without some sort of test...make it simple...a specific rule reguarding arfs and allow them to compete...sorry i'm with JB on this...new rule....jim

Randy Smith · Nov 19, 2004 02:33 PM

#19 source

""and furthermore...just how would u go about KNOWING someone did or didnt build their own airplane?...other than an obvious ARF...without some sort of test...make it simple...a specific rule reguarding arfs and allow them to compete...sorry i'm with JB on this...new rule....jim"""


HI Jim

We really do not need a rule on this. We have one already
ARFs are legal to fly in most any PAMPA class. and old time , You just DO NOT get appearance points for the model. The only contest you cannot use ARfs at is for example , the U.S. NATs where the fly Jr. SR. Open, those 3 groups have a BOM. The Advance, Intermediate, and beginner do not , so ARFs are OK to fly there.
So bottom line is for most of the contest held , you can fly an AFR , Including the U.S. Team Trials.

Regards

Randy

jim ivey · Nov 19, 2004 04:07 PM

#22 source
i know there was appearance points when i flew ...but like i said in an earlier post it wasn't adhered too.... i think they(arfs)should be allowed in all competition ... even th nats ... cause someone else CAN build the airplane u fly at th nats and u could still win...im sure you know what i mean ...so whats the difference ... i guess what i mean is this...if some kids dad built his airplane or he bought an arf from JB......whats th difference th kid still didnt build it!...do u see my meaning...or am i not makin any sence again...jim

Randy Smith · Nov 19, 2004 10:13 PM

#35 source
>i know there was appearance points when i flew ...but like i
>said in an earlier post it wasn't adhered too.... i think
>they(arfs)should be allowed in all competition ... even th
>nats ... cause someone else CAN build the airplane u fly at
>th nats and u could still win...im sure you know what i mean
>...so whats the difference ... i guess what i mean is
>this...if some kids dad built his airplane or he bought an
>arf from JB......whats th difference th kid still didnt
>build it!...do u see my meaning...or am i not makin any
>sence again...jim


HI Jim

Yes you are making sense, I was only addressing the fact that ARFs are legal in most of the contest as of today. As far as giving them apperance points, and allowing them to fly at the Open, Jr. , and Sr. level at the NATs ,this would require a rules change by the AMA process . I am sure someone will be making a proposal for this very item soon

Regards

Randy

Jim Pollock · Nov 19, 2004 05:41 AM

#9 source
Ahhh, jim...

There are no appearance points in OTS or P40, and the Brodak Cardinal has won numerous times in both P-40 and seperate ARF events. The Smoothie although operating with a 10 point handicap because it has flaps could still be a viable contender for winning OTS events. I fully intend to try winning some OTS events when I obtain my Smoothie! With 20 appearance points and sometimes 20 fidelity points I believe as you that giving up that many points would probably be a fatal blow to winning in Classic or PAMPA classes, except of course if the plane happened to belong to Bart!

Jim Pollock

Norm · Nov 19, 2004 07:30 AM

#10 source
It seems I am not comfortable unless there is a wing being built on my construction board. I have no interest in ARFs.
My latest scratch built just came off the board at 59-3/8" long.
Tail feathers are under construction.
Everyone's situation is different. I do what feels best.
I love the adrenalin rush of taking out a new plane and getting it in trim. That wouldn't happen with an ARF.
When my buddy makes his first flights with a new plane...he always holds out his hand to see how badly it is shaking. I don't understand people who fly only one plane and they don't understand me. Diversity is what makes us all interesting. I choose not enter competitions but respect that other people choose to enter.
If someone brings an ARF to the field. He/She is welcome and we would be thrilled to see them fly.
I wonder if there is any "pride of construction" in the Snaggletooth house?
I guess my point is...if it works for you, do it.

Dick Fowler · Nov 19, 2004 08:03 AM

#11 source
It would be interesting to know sales figures for CL ARFs' by demographics. I would venture a guess that most of these ARFs' are being sold to people with CL flying experience not rank beginners.

Most of the guys in our group want or built one as "pattern foder" or just a go fly it with no emotions plane. It's a bunch less nerve racking to fire up the ARF after a lay-off (here in OH it's as much as four months) and get the reflexes retrained than to take out the contest ship. Considering the cost and time required to get in the air... they are just another tool for perfecting the skills.

glenwearden · Nov 19, 2004 09:13 AM

#12 source
I think I'm going to get an ARF Flite Streak to train with, and to "fly-in" engines after bench break-in. I want to get comfortable with outside loops, flying inverted, etc., before I start to really try the pattern with my ARF Nobler, or my '57 Nobler kit that I plan to get serious and build "some day". The ARF Flite Streak should be easy to repair, and is cheap enough so wrecking it won't be the end of the world..... Glen

Glen Wearden

jehold66203 · Nov 19, 2004 09:31 AM

#14 source
We don't give the rank beginner enough credit. I remember a few years back when an ole timer came by the field and watched me fly. He asked a few questions stating he had always wanted to build and fly model planes, but, never had the time. The old story of couldn't afford it as a kid, family and job in later years. He was a retired engineer. His first plane was a profile kit he modified to an upright engine with a beautiful finish. He also flew that plane from the very first flight. He did admit to getting a little dizzy. How many remember getting dizzy the first time. I have also seen a youngster take a plane that was crashed by another person and put it back together and fly. These are just a few of the stories I could relate regarding beginers. At the time they don't know they aren't supposed to be able to do it. I think ARF's will be the thing if the so called experts don't discourage people first. Also I think if instructions are followed, the ARF will get the beginner going.DOC

catdaddy · Nov 19, 2004 10:26 AM

#17 source
>We don't give the rank beginner enough credit.

Doc,
You're right on with this. My oldest son took to flying CL like a duck to water. I was simply amazed at how quickly he picked it up.
He was doing loops and wingovers on his second flight. I have a friend whose son was the same way only he was doing lazy figure 8's on the last few minutes of his FIRST flight. We wondered if years of video games and the hand/eye thing it develops played a role.
What ever the reason some people take to some things much faster than others including flying CL.

Interesting note, while my oldest can out fly me he can't touch a bottle of glue without glueing his fingers together ARF's are defintely a part of his future.

regards,
Rick "catdaddy" Blankenship

wcrane · Nov 19, 2004 03:42 PM

#21 source
Hell that ain't nuthin, I was doing loops and wingovers on my first flight too! But I got better. My brother had a Cox Mustang, alls it would do was a figure 9.

From somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane
AMA 6733

shelby554 · Nov 19, 2004 09:24 AM

#13 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 09:27 AM (CST)
 
I buy and fly ARF's as my primary airplanes. Even though I have 2 builds planned this winter, and have built a number of airplanes over time, I really like the ARF's because of price, light weight, decent appearance, and frankly, the dreaded, "instant gratification".

I really don't like to build all that much!

Don Jones

Alan Hahn · Nov 19, 2004 09:45 AM

#15 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 09:46 AM (CST)
 
I think your original post says a lot.

As most "Experts" will say, even a well built plane needs to be trimmed in to flying. I think no matter how you get something into the air (Scratch, kit, bought from another flyer, or ARF), whether it flies well depends upon the next step of trimming. I include engine, tank, warps, wingtip weight,........

If your Arf Nobler wasn't flying right, I think you haven't spent enough time to trim it out. There is no reason that it won't fly as well as a kit built Green box Nobler (built straight with good wood).

I don't disagree that the emotional attachment is different, but that is a sword which cuts both ways.

Alan

Sparky12366 · Nov 19, 2004 10:03 AM

#16 source
>
>If your Arf Nobler wasn't flying right, I think you haven't
>spent enough time to trim it out.

Let me put it this way Not my cup of tea!

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

DW · Nov 19, 2004 02:41 PM

#20 source
I think arf's will allways have a place. They're great for the person with way to much on the go to build, they're great for the retread who wants to see if he/she still has it with out sacrificing a plane they spent months building just to watch it end up as kindling, I once saw a guy come back with a spit polished All American sr. only to pile drive it into the ground(pavement) on the first flight he was so upset that he just left it and went home (true story) If he was flying a ukey or some other trainer arf maybe he would'nt have been so upset. Anywho that's my two cents worth I think arfs will allways have place. Oh and yes I will allways help a nubie no matter what they are flying so long as the plane is safe even if it is a PT-19 trainer.
Dwayne

dennis · Nov 19, 2004 04:50 PM

#24 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 04:55 PM (CST)
 
I've read the threads with interest and will throw a few comments in. More of a rambling discourse really so excuse the lack of proper format.
Having been around ARF's for over 40 years and having had more then my share of them I'm not so anxious about them as some here are. They serve a purpose and that is to get you in the air quickly and without emotional attachment. PERIOD.
Everything else that you are throwing out is a point of view and certainly has merit, but remember that your opinion is not the sum of the whole group. If you like to build then do so but that is your option. If appearance points are so important then build it of forfit them. Where is the problem here.
As to beginners crashing an arf sure it will happen,I'd be suprised if they don't prang it at least a few times, better think back to when you were crashing those cox ARF's that really didn't fly. Your still here so I guess that statement isn't wholly true either.
Instant gratification, a whole new thing, not hardly. Give credit to the baby boomers for that. Can you blame the next generation if they don't want to build. They have been conditioned by their parents to expect nay demand instant gratification. So with that clear why would you expect the average newcommer to build his trainer and go fly.You had to build yours when you started, the hobby as moved forward in many ways since many started in the 30's and this is just another evolution. Don't expect an arf to do away with building models.It certainly didn't happen in the RC field where the ARF movement started.
In RC they found that up to 1/2 of those who started to build a trainer never finished them and never learned to fly. With the introduction of ARF's that percentage went up dramatically. I'd rather have them buy any arf and at least try then never do so. wouldn't you.Success initially keeps a new modeller in the hobby for the first 2 years. A developed interest in a certain aspect of the hobby will then continue his interest.
Are most of these arf's being bought by those already in the hobby, you bet. I've glued balsa together for 50 years and know how to do it as well as the next guy. I don't feel that I have to keep proving that I can do it with every plane that I fly. Certainly it's fun to fly a plane that you didn't have to spend months building and meets or exceeds your expectations.
I wrote perhaps the first thread on Flitelines saying that the market was overdue for an ARF C/L model and was almost burned at the stake for saying so. It happened and the world didn't end, so the initial offering proved that the market can support more of them so are you suprised that the market is filling a demand that some would seem to be oblivious to.
There is no reason to be biased on arfs, someone may be buying one today that will be the word champion in 5 years. You never know it could happen.
Dennis
Edit, I really need a spelling check

ty marcucci · Nov 19, 2004 04:37 PM

#23 source
ARF's are here to stay. In fact they have been here a lonngg time. Just go back through all the old issues of FM, MAN, AT, etc. My first was an RTF-AJ Firebaby. It got me in the air and I couldn't wait to build more, and different planes. I enjoy building more than the actual flying. I have five in various modes of constuction as I type this. Cold and wet out, so I'm in here.
For many of us, but certainly not many, the hunt is more exciting than the kill. I enjoy the combat matches, lainching my 1/2A gas free flight, etc. I have never really cared about the trophy after getting any type of win. Winning is nice, but it seems hollow and empty compared to the actual flying or building. For me. Others will not agree nor should they.
I have two ARFs, the Nobler, which I promptly modified, and the Flite Streak, whicih is fairly stock. I don't like either, but they have served as backups.

I have heard thet they are killing the kit business for certain producers. I hope this is a tempoary trend and goes down.

Dick Fowler · Nov 19, 2004 04:54 PM

#25 source
Quote... "I have heard thet they are killing the kit business for certain producers. I hope this is a tempoary trend and goes down."

At Brodak's this year, we had some discussion regarding what effect the ARFs would have on Brodak's own kit business. Example: We can purchased from our local source, a Cardinal profile kit for $79.00 and a Cardinal ARF for $100.00. There's more than $21.00 in additional materials to finish the kit with out considering any labor. Seemed to us that Brodak's own kit sales for these planes would suffer. Particularly the profile stuff.

I don't think the cottage industry kit guys are getting rich as it is and I too hope they don't pack it in.

Mikey · Nov 19, 2004 05:05 PM

#26 source
Well sports fans just for the fun of it, here is my opinion on AFR models.

I think they are just fine for someone that needs to get a model in the air fast just so he/she has something to fly. I don’t think that you will see a big influx of new people pouring into C/L clubs or fields just from the ARF’s, but they will have their place in the sport. Some ARF models would make a good test bed for breaking in engines or when you just want to do a little sport flying without risking or putting undue wear on your contest ship. The ARF models will also provide a source of models for people that don’t have the place and/or the skills needed to build a model from a kit or plans. This is not a slam, but just a fact that some people can’t build or don’t have a place to build, but they do love to fly.

Flying your ARF model at a contest is fine with me and should be encouraged by all fellow modelers. However, they should not receive appearance points for an ARF. If you have a different class for the ARF models, then knock yourself out and give them all the points you want. Some of the people that I have helped think that just because you by an ARF and assemble it they think it should fly competitively right out of the box. Most ARF models will fly quite well but not to the point of being a true contest winner. It still takes the knowledge and know-how to trim a model to its full potential. Trimming is something that takes time to learn or the help of an experienced stunt flyer to achieve. I don’t know of a single stunt flyer that would not give anyone a helping hand if they needed it or asked for it (that includes Bret LOL).

I also assembled the Nobler & Flite Streak ARF’s and was impressed with the overall quality of the construction and instructions. Sure there are a few things that I would (and did) change but for the most part, a reasonably flyable model can be easily assembled in a very short amount of time. I have yet to see any of the new ARF models from Brodak with the exception of the Wendy’s Profile. There again, pretty nice model for the money and should serve as a very nice platform for those who fly one.

It is my opinion and many others that building the models is ½ the fun. To this I agree totally but I do not want to imply that flying an ARF is something Not Cool. I enjoy designing and building models of my own creation (after all that is what I do for a living) and to see that model perform as I intended is a very satisfying and provides a feeling of accomplishment that is hard to describe. Finishing is another aspect of stunt flying (modeling) that I enjoy that lets the artistic side come out with different types and styles paint schemes.

One of the big issues that many of the modelers are missing today is that they can go as far with this hobby/sport as they want to. Be it sport flyer or hard core (like me) competitor there is room for us all.

Mikey

Mike Pratt

Circle Burner · Nov 19, 2004 05:41 PM

#27 source
Mikey,

That makes the most sense so far. The only thing I will add is some find it hard to purchase a kit when the Arf can be had for about 20 bucks more. Just makes good business sense for some to buy the arf, your getting more for your money and a lot less effort is required.

However, I like to build almost as much as the flying. How about Sig Mikey, any new c/l planes going to be produced or is SIG totally r/c?

I'm a huge Sig fan, my first real c/l plane was a Twister, first r/c plane was a Kadet Mark I.

Thanks,
John

jehold66203 · Nov 19, 2004 05:47 PM

#28 source
>Well sports fans just for the fun of it, here is my opinion
>on AFR models.
>
>I think they are just fine for someone that needs to get a
>model in the air fast just so he/she has something to fly.
>I don’t think that you will see a big influx of new people
>pouring into C/L clubs or fields just from the ARF’s, but
>they will have their place in the sport. Some ARF models
>would make a good test bed for breaking in engines or when
>you just want to do a little sport flying without risking or
>putting undue wear on your contest ship. The ARF models
>will also provide a source of models for people that don’t
>have the place and/or the skills needed to build a model
>from a kit or plans. This is not a slam, but just a fact
>that some people can’t build or don’t have a place to build,
>but they do love to fly.
>
>Flying your ARF model at a contest is fine with me and
>should be encouraged by all fellow modelers. However, they
>should not receive appearance points for an ARF. If you
>have a different class for the ARF models, then knock
>yourself out and give them all the points you want. Some of
>the people that I have helped think that just because you by
>an ARF and assemble it they think it should fly
>competitively right out of the box. Most ARF models will
>fly quite well but not to the point of being a true contest
>winner. It still takes the knowledge and know-how to trim a
>model to its full potential. Trimming is something that
>takes time to learn or the help of an experienced stunt
>flyer to achieve. I don’t know of a single stunt flyer that
>would not give anyone a helping hand if they needed it or
>asked for it (that includes Bret LOL).
>
>I also assembled the Nobler & Flite Streak ARF’s and was
>impressed with the overall quality of the construction and
>instructions. Sure there are a few things that I would (and
>did) change but for the most part, a reasonably flyable
>model can be easily assembled in a very short amount of
>time. I have yet to see any of the new ARF models from
>Brodak with the exception of the Wendy’s Profile. There
>again, pretty nice model for the money and should serve as a
>very nice platform for those who fly one.
>
>It is my opinion and many others that building the models is
>½ the fun. To this I agree totally but I do not want to
>imply that flying an ARF is something Not Cool. I enjoy
>designing and building models of my own creation (after all
>that is what I do for a living) and to see that model
>perform as I intended is a very satisfying and provides a
>feeling of accomplishment that is hard to describe.
>Finishing is another aspect of stunt flying (modeling) that
>I enjoy that lets the artistic side come out with different
>types and styles paint schemes.
>
>One of the big issues that many of the modelers are missing
>today is that they can go as far with this hobby/sport as
>they want to. Be it sport flyer or hard core (like me)
>competitor there is room for us all.
>
>Mikey
>

Thank you Mikey. The Primary Force is flying better each time I take it out. Finally solving fuel problems with one of my trusty Fox 35's. Thanks again for a wonderful design. While looking for a set of plans for another modeler, I found the Force plans. May have to get it going. Later, -DOC:-)

Mikey · Nov 19, 2004 06:02 PM

#29 source
Hey Doc!!!!

The Force is a butt kicker with a LA 46 mounted up front. Let me know and I will send you the specs. Way Cool!!!!

Mikey

Mike Pratt

Jim T. · Nov 19, 2004 06:32 PM

#30 source
In spite of tales to the contrary, I don't think any of the current ARF's are good beginner airplanes, and I think Control Line really needs one. I was in Wal-Mart and looked around a little bit. There was a lot of RC stuff in toy areas, and not just in the designated RC section. I didn't see any of the Cox or Bratco CL planes, but I could have missed them. What it amounts to is that there are RC airplanes, cars, etc. etc. readily available which can be made to work without going anywhere but Wal-Mart. This is not true of any CL arplane I know of.

I learned to fly CL by myself, and I imagine others here did also. What are the chances of someone like myself managing to get together a CL airplane, get it operating, and learn to fly it around level without help? Two messages here if we wish to grow control line: we need to help people, secondly, we need a take it out of the box and fly it CL trainer.

Jim

Jim P · Nov 19, 2004 06:53 PM

#31 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 06:58 PM (CST)
 
Local beginner class phenom Chris Kennedy would never have competed in stunt without purchased or ARF airplanes available.
He's looking good, will move up fast, and I think will stick around.
The same might could be said of Ben Woolslayer who won open intermediate at the 2004 nats as a senior.
Local intermediate but moving into advanced hard core competitor Mike Finnigan has never competed with an airplane he built. His ARF Nobler/Brodak 40 looks like it is on rails.

Circlepilot · Nov 19, 2004 08:50 PM

#32 source
I'll second you Jim on Mike's ARF Nobler...I flew against it several times this year and with the engine combination...Well, lets say he has the thing dailed in. Even without appearance points, his scores were way up there...BUMP UP! About ARFs? When I got back from over-seas in 1971, I was still flying C/L.(combat and sport)I found the local flying site (R/C) and was told to fly my C/Ls down at the other end of the deserted runway...WWaaayyy! down at the other end. Maybe I needed a bath or something??? You get the idea. I wanted so bad to get into R/C...Everyone it seemed, that I tried to get information from, was real protective of all the "Smoke and mirrors."
I finally bought a "whole ball of wax," ready to fly, from a widow lady. Foolishly...I would go to the field when no one was there and accidently taught myself to fly. I made a promise to myself that I would always help the new guy. The introduction of the C/L ARFs, especially the Flite Streak, needs to be pushed by all of us, to all, young and old. I own a couple of ARFs and own a Sky Lark that was built by another...I look upon them as tools...I still love to build and will until I can no longer do it. I left R/C a few years ago and with the help of some dear friends, re-discovered my roots. Now I catch myself flying the pattern in the shower, while driving to work, standing in Wal-Mart??? Take a look around at the next meet you attend...Lota old guys...and few younguns.

Circlepilot

Sparky12366 · Nov 19, 2004 08:55 PM

#33 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 08:55 PM (CST)
 
Now I catch myself flying the pattern in the shower,
>while driving to work, standing in Wal-Mart??? Take a look
>around at the next meet you attend...Lota old guys...and few
>younguns.

I work in a Harley-Davidson dealership and was caught in th act of the pattern. They thought I was some kind of KungFu Expert. LOL

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

mcm · Nov 19, 2004 09:20 PM

#34 source
I'm all for ARFs, but Ben and his father would have perfected another plane and trimmed for the contest even if the plane he used was not available. Ben is a phenom and has learned excellent building skills from his father. His use of the Bucaneer was well timed, but my real gut feeling is that he would have had his Vector he built there if the Bucaneer wasn't available.

However, I love the ARFs. I can practice powerplant/prop combinations and learn maneuvers without worrying about destroying a work of love. No, they aren't great for beginners. But I am so happy they are an alternative.

Mikey · Nov 22, 2004 09:12 PM

#37 source
>In spite of tales to the contrary, I don't think any of the
>current ARF's are good beginner airplanes, and I think
>Control Line really needs one. I was in Wal-Mart and looked
>around a little bit. There was a lot of RC stuff in toy
>areas, and not just in the designated RC section. I didn't
>see any of the Cox or Bratco CL planes, but I could have
>missed them. What it amounts to is that there are RC
>airplanes, cars, etc. etc. readily available which can be
>made to work without going anywhere but Wal-Mart. This is
>not true of any CL arplane I know of.
>
>I learned to fly CL by myself, and I imagine others here did
>also. What are the chances of someone like myself managing
>to get together a CL airplane, get it operating, and learn
>to fly it around level without help? Two messages here if
>we wish to grow control line: we need to help people,
>secondly, we need a take it out of the box and fly it CL
>trainer.
>
>Jim

Jim,
I think your assumption on the current ARF or ARC models being lousy trainers is dead on. They are a bit fragile for the beginner. But the old standby solid wood models are too costly to produce for the mass market. Something molded out of foam and reinforced with plywood is a good start for a low cost material. However, the cost for the molds would scare the heck out of you (20 to 30K). Electric power is not the answer at all. The electric motor and the batteries are not that bad if you use something like the low cost 500 can motors. But when you start putting all the components together that are needed, such as the model, electric motor, prop, wheels, batteries, charger, the price gets out of hand in a hurry. In addition, the rank beginner would need the model completely assembled with everything included, including the lines and handle.

It is also my opinion that if it sold for more than $75.00 you would be shooting yourself in the foot, BIG TIME! So how do we make a trainer like that? You only have a few options to do this. Get some rich guy to come up with 75K and lie to him saying that we will make his investment back in a few years (maybe 10) LOL. Or look at another alternative and that my friend, is the hard part. I can’t think of a manufacturer that is willing to speculate 75K for a C/L trainer. Sorry to put a wet blanket on your idea but these are the facts. Estes spent 30K just on the tooling for the updated PT-19 plus the cost of manufacturing the models and the engines.

Mikey

Mike Pratt

peabody · Nov 22, 2004 04:10 PM

#36 source
I've watched the ARF's bloom here in NJ....and I'll offer a couple of observations:
1) THEY CAN BE BUILT WRONG! but they're fixable.
2) The Flite Streak with an OS .25 LA is a terrific move for someone that has learned to fly one of the butt-ugle but indestructable Guillows/Brodak trainers that we keep...
3) The ARF's have upgraded the flying skills of several...mainly because they are relatively light, straight and complete...even the Nobler.........
4) A lot of folks that built fairly wretched Ringmasters are grinning BIG TIME after the Streak.
5) "tinkering" with an ARF at the suggestion of a skilled builder/flyer can greatly upgrade skills in a short time...because the basic platform is sound.
6) ARCs are going to be even more appealing to a bunch that has simply run out of time and would enjoy a new piece, or an addition to their "air force".

See Ya

Peabody

DennisM · Nov 22, 2004 11:51 PM

#38 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-22-04 AT 11:52 PM (CST)
 
For me it's melded. Weird actually. I'm currently flying a mix of an ARF and kit builds. The ARF Streak is a wonderful stunt trainer with an LA25. Flown it about 80 times doing the beginner pattern better and better. For some reason never crash this plane whereas all the other ones get dorked. I've a sort of Fancherized Twister nearly repaired. A kit jr. flite streak buzzing at high speeds with an FP15. A Buster nearly done and ready. A used foamy I just bought at a swap. My ARF Cardinal awaits. Then there is a Magician waiting for a space on my genuine flat aluminum building board... I report steady progress in all areas. Every plane seems to have its uses.

I'm not alone, half the people in my club most of whom are serious flyers (serious about having their fun) have bought ARF Cardinals. They looked so good for the money... They bought these Cardinals even though they fly kit and scratch built and their own original design planes... Some of our most skilled builders enjoy the heck out of the ARFs. Even as they continue building and designing. We don't seem to have much trouble adjusting to the new lay of the land. Just adds to the riches of the hobby.

Dennis Moritz