Is this too much to ask?

From all of the stuff floating around PAMPA and my friends, I really only want to know:

1) Status of Mr. Brodak's treatment of none other that Warren Tiahrt. A mere 14 of our most influential and honorable suggested a resolution to this issue. John has so far just blown it off.

2) Whom is responsible for having changed the "free"* PAMPA advertisement in Flying Models magazine. While I do not like the changes, this is not a capital crime; I find amazing that the person responsible can't just fess up.

3) When my current representative on the PAMPA EC will receive his very own copy of proposed by-laws changes. Until he gets the changes, no one in District 11 is being represented during the debate(s). This seems to run counter to current claims concerning opening up our representation, but there it is.

That's it, three items. Simple.

>From all of the stuff floating around PAMPA and my friends,
>I really only want to know:
>
>1) Status of Mr. Brodak's treatment of none other that
>Warren Tiahrt. A mere 14 of our most influential and
>honorable suggested a resolution to this issue. John has so
>far just blown it off.
>
>2) Whom is responsible for having changed the "free"* PAMPA
>advertisement in Flying Models magazine. While I do not like
>the changes, this is not a capital crime; I find amazing
>that the person responsible can't just fess up.
>
>3) When my current representative on the PAMPA EC will
>receive his very own copy of proposed by-laws changes. Until
>he gets the changes, no one in District 11 is being
>represented during the debate(s). This seems to run counter
>to current claims concerning opening up our representation,
>but there it is.
>
>That's it, three items. Simple.
>
>Dan
>
>*That free ad might not cost PAMPA anything, but don't think
>the publisher sees it as free. If nothing else, there is a
>monthly proof sheet set out to all advertisers, this piece
>having for years gone to Shareen, she being our contact with
>FM. And, no, she did not change the ad! And of course there
>was some cost on FM's side in changing the ad. And now we
>will (assumedly) be changing it back, again adding costs to
>FM side of the equation. Maybe they ought make the ad free
>to all parties, by just telling us to take a hike!
>
>Dan

Ron B.
F4Fguy

Dan:

Do you really expect any of these cretins to stand up and be counted?????!!!!!

LAST EDITED ON Nov-21-04 AT 06:50 PM (CST)
 
Well, I don't know how most anyone on this forum can answer any of the questions, and I grow tired of the ##### things, even though I know ya like poken and prodden, no offense. But here's also what I get tired of.

The 'Those guys are ellitest' crap
The 'You weren't there at the beginning so you don't know' crap
and the 'Lets get John railroaded out by making at least some squawk at every little blast of warm air that comes out of his butt.' crap

How bout we just talk model airplanes? Tis sooo much more fun. Hell, I'd go for another 50 Os 20fp replies over one more of the over 200 replies to that one bogus bit of flatulance.

Come on, lets hurl some fox 15's, bitch about BOM and get back to the things that made this place fun. I'm still trying to budget in a Fox .049 for a Walt M. contest if we actually get one going.

Play with me Dan, Please....

Geeeawwddd, I feel kinda dirty now.