Next step up?
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 12 of 12 known posts recovered
Nils
However, the thought did occur to me that maybe it is smarter to quit dipping your toe in the cold water, and dive in whole hog (that is called a triple mixed metaphor) with a dream ship that could win advanced anywhere. Personally, I am going one slow step at a time, just as you are.
Anxiously awaiting what the gang has to say.
LF
Scott Riese · Nov 18, 2000 01:23 PM
#4 sourceAlan
>not any better than the Sig Banshee. Anybody
>ever flown the Cardinal? And is it any better
>than the Twister?
The Banshee and Twister are close to one another in wing size and airfoils. Both are straight-chord wings, as are the Oriental, as well as the Tanager. The latter two are larger, and potentially offer a lower wing loading, which improves stunting capability.
The Lagg-3 and the Cardinal offer tapered wings, with the Cardinal having the very thick airfoil developed in the northeast for a design called the Patternmaster. It may be more of a full- out competition wing than any named here.
Personally, I've flown Banshees, Orientals, Twisters, and a great many others, but never built or flew a Cardinal, sorry.
Kiwi
Bill Hummel · Nov 21, 2000 03:36 PM
#8 sourceKey is to build straight and light, and to GET A GOOD MOTOR RUN! You'll never figure how well something flies if you are fooling with the powerplant forever! Buy, beg or invent a real stunt motor, put it into a light and straight package, and have fun!
See Ya
Peabody
Just a thought. A conservative, built up design is a good choice too. If your not sure, try something like the Brodak Oriental (full fuse). Don McClave has been winning expert with this design up here (Northwest) for a long time.
Randy