Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Klotz better than Castor...?

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 14 of 14 known posts recovered

Jim Duda · Nov 29, 2000 03:06 PM

#0 source
http://www.klotzlube.com/products/rc/products.html

Does anyone have practical experience with either Benol, SuperTechniPlate, or R50? If it's not Hype, they all sound interesting... Duda in Austin, TX

LNeumann · Nov 30, 2000 10:24 AM

#1 source
Well, Jim, I was waiting for others to jump in on this, but, so far, no takers. I suppose it could be no one really has any experience with these oils. And, probably for a reason. Klotz makes oils for many applications--all the way from our tiny engines up to the mighty fuel dragsters and race cars. You need different lubricants for gas engines than you need for those using methanol. Engines that store the oil in the crankcase may use a different blend than those that mix it with their fuel. 2-strokes, 4-strokes, but, especially, high heat racing applications. If you notice the advertising on the lubes that you mentioned, those are the words that stand out. "High Heat" "Extreme."

For our applications castor oil is still the best lubricant. In some engines you need to use all castor. In some engines a 50-50 blend is recommended. In some it is optional. But with rare exception, you will never find a manufacturer recommending anything less than 50% castor. And the synthetics used by the major manufacturers are usually one of two or three different kinds. Castor has an enduring quality in that, even in high heat applications, it stays with the engine. In high heat, and under high stress, it turns to varnish and continues to protect the engine, while most synthetics will burn off. This is why the RC guys like the synthetics. No oil clean up afterwards. But if there is no oil coming out of the engine, you can guess what is happening inside the engine.

One of the problems in using castor is that if your engine does run hot you will get that varnish residue inside the engine. For some of the older iron piston engines this actually helps the fit and the seal. And should you run synthetic in that engine, it will clean it out (read the Byron's label) and you will lose the seal. On the other hand, with some of our modern engines, a varnish build up could lead to premature wear. For these applications a castor-synthetic mix will sometimes give you the best of both worlds. The castor will give you that extra quality of lubrication. The synthetic will keep the castor from leaving a varnish build up.

So, what I am trying to say is, stick with castor--at least a 50-50 blend--unless the manufacturer says you simply can't use it. And there are no "magic" oils for our purpose. If there were, the fuel suppliers would be using them (unless it was cost prohibitive, in which case it still might be cheaper for us to buy a new engine occasionally.)

And don't believe the hype that was spread (and still being spread) by Red Max. It is absolute garbage. The real moral of the story is, they got hold of some bad castor (cheap import) and can't get rid of it. Good castor is still available (and always has been) through all of the other manufacturers and Red Max's synthetic simply doesn't hold up as well as castor. We used to use their fuel. But I figure if they don't like their fuel any more, I don't, either. They just hurt themselves.

Leonard Neumann

Jim Duda · Nov 30, 2000 01:11 PM

#2 source
Point taken, Leonard. If this stuff really DOES work, I'm sure it will eventually show up in the winner's circle at the NATS.
I'm still wondering if their Benol is an "improved version" of Baker's AA castor. Might just have to get a pint and experiment - I'll write Klotz and see what they claim the difference is between it and good ol' AA castor.

LNeumann · Nov 30, 2000 03:25 PM

#3 source
Your answer might be found in the Klotz description of this lube on their own web site: "the choice of serious racers.... Recommended only for fully modified racing applications."

They state that it is "Degummed and extra fortified" which makes me think that there is something here other than just plain old castor oil. It doesn't sound like something we would normally use in our modeling appliacations.

Baker's AA, as I understand it, is simply the oil from the castor bean, pressed twice (the "AA" designation) and degummed. Nothing more. Nothing less. It is not "chemically extracted" as Red Max claims on their web site, although it is possible that some inferior castor oil from India or South America may be done this way, and, if that is what they got, that's their problem, not ours. I just won't use Red Max fuel any more figuring that if they aren't happy with it, I won't be, either. Surprisingly, they seem to be the only ones affected by this (of the major suppliers in the US). If you don't buy quality, you can't give quality.


Leonard Neumann

Brett Buck · Nov 30, 2000 04:10 PM

#4 source

>Baker's AA, as I understand it,
>is simply the oil from
>the castor bean, pressed twice
>(the "AA" designation) and degummed.
> Nothing more. Nothing
>less. It is not
>"chemically extracted" as Red Max
>claims on their web site,
>although it is possible that
>some inferior castor oil from
>India or South America may
>be done this way, and,
>if that is what they
>got, that's their problem, not
>ours. I just won't
>use Red Max fuel any
>more figuring that if they
>aren't happy with it, I
>won't be, either. Surprisingly,
>they seem to be the
>only ones affected by this
>(of the major suppliers in
>the US). If you
>don't buy quality, you can't
>give quality.


I got tricked on this for a while, myself. I talked to their fuel guy, and got the "chemically extracted" and "pressed oil unavailable" story, along with an experiment to try. I got some of the their fuel, with only their synthetic oil. I also had them send some castor oil. The experiment they suggested was to add the oil and let sit, after which they claimed a white precipitate would form. I tried it, and sure enough, after a day or so, there was a bunch of white stuff in the bottom of the jug. Fair enough. Then I did the same experiement with SIG Castor Oil, and with Powermaster castor oil from the hobby shop. Lo and behold, nothing happened. No white stuff, ran fine. So, maybe it's some other fuel component in Red Max. I tried putting Red Max castor in some SIG fuel. Bunch of white stuff after a day or so. It really was bad castor oil. Bad RED MAX castor oil, others seemed fine.

Armed with this knowledge, I being a big-time rokit syentist, I went over to the standards lab during lunch hour, and had them through a little Red Max castor in the gas chromatograph. Wonder of wonders, there was some xylene present. Xylene is commonly used as an extraction agent to produce low-quality castor oil. Threw a little Sig oil in there, and even more wondrous, no xylene at all.

Conclusion: Guys at Red Max were largely telling the truth, the oil they had will not mix, seemingly was chemically extracted, and was unsuitable. The false part was that uncontaminated oil was unavaliable. When I asked them, instead of some mitigating argument, I got a sales pitch for their "proprietary" oil, and how we "Ukie guys" didn't know what we were talking about. This was unsatisfying.

The end result was that after a long period of good experiences, I didn't care to use Red Max anymore. I instead now use fuel from organizations that haven't tried to fool me. SIG, Powermaster, Byron, and others seem to have exactly what they claim. Despite the fact that "no one makes good castor oil anymore (circa 1995)", there seems to be no problem getting it.

Brett

peabody · Nov 30, 2000 10:39 PM

#5 source
Jim:

In a previous life I was in the oil business (pronounced AWWL by most in it), and I came to believe strongly that at lower temps castor is good stuff, but, at high temps, synthetics are the plan. Castor burns. Good synthetics don't until we start seeing whisps of piston in the exhaust port.

It cost me a bunch to learn that, and the guy didn't answer what I asked, but I still find it useful?

See Ya

Peabody

geoffgg · Dec 01, 2000 08:04 AM

#6 source
Hey guys, do you have Castrol in the US? I met a chemist from Aussie Castrol at a dinner last week and we had a fairly interesting conversation about the alternatives. He told me that Castrol's castor is called Castrol M (for M ethanol compatible) but he also told me of several other Castrol castor/synthetic blends that he thinks we should think about. So, is there any experience of Castrol in the US?

Cheers, Geoff

Alan Hahn · Dec 01, 2000 02:52 PM

#7 source
First of all, I'm not an expert, just parroting what I have read and heard.
So with that caveat, I thought the castor/synthetic issue was just the opposite: at high temperate synthetic burns (look ma, no mess on my wing!) while castor polymerizes into that dark goo which a lot of us have come to love/hate. The goo isn't much of a lubricant, but it's better than nothing (the synthetic vapor trail).

Alan

Randy · Dec 01, 2000 08:04 PM

#8 source
Stalker recommends all synthetic oil at low percentage (about 17%). After messing with this engine for most of a summer, I took the factory's advice and the thing finally ran really well. Fox on the other hand says all castor and a lot of it. Do this and it runs great.

So, I suppose it depends on the engine. As a sort of standard (I mark fuel bottles with the formula in them), I use half synth half castor (I get mine from Castrol-a local guy carries it surprisingly).

Randy

Iskandar Taib · Apr 23, 2001 01:57 PM

#13 source
>Jim:
>
>In a previous life I was
>in the oil business (pronounced
>AWWL by most in it),
>and I came to believe
>strongly that at lower temps
>castor is good stuff, but,
>at high temps, synthetics are
>the plan. Castor burns.
> Good synthetics don't until
>we start seeing whisps of
>piston in the exhaust port.
>
>
>It cost me a bunch to
>learn that, and the guy
>didn't answer what I asked,
>but I still find it
>useful?
>

It's actually the other way around. Synthetics (at least, the common alcohol soluble polyglycols used in model airplane fuel) will burn, while castor polymerizes into varnish. Castor will protect your engine in the case of a lean run, synthetics won't.

Jim Duda · Dec 04, 2000 05:17 PM

#9 source
Thought you guys might be interested in Klotz's response to my question as to why they thought Benol was superior to AA Castor...(Unbiased opinion, of course...wink) Go figure.
"Jim,
Thank you for your interest in the Klotz products. The BeNOL is
superior to AA castor by the following: 1.) Cleaner Burning. 2.) Higher Film Strength. 3.) All Around A Better Product.

Ben L.
Klotz"

jd

The Kiwi · Apr 18, 2001 03:49 AM

RE: Castor percentages & etc. #10 source
This was the only thread at SSW that the search function could turn up with that had the word "Castor" in the subject line.

Tony had been wanting to confirm the "29%" all-castor idea for a Fox engine (I think) that he acquired. I said if it needs to be broken in, go with the high oil content. Also, if it's a really old Fox or other iron-piston engine, avoid the synthetic to keep from dissolving out any castor varnish that is helping the old beastie's compression seal.

But I used 25% oil fuel (volume measurement) in Fox iron piston engines for 20 years without seeing excess wear to any of mine; now, let's admit that during that 20 years, I wasn't putting 5-6 flights a week on any single engine to really build up huge running times. I haven't "worn out" a sport or stunt type engine in maybe 25 years that wasn't damaged through use in racing or other unusual usage.

My combat engines, including various Fox and Super Tigre iron piston motors, were operated with 20% oil high-nitro fuels and I wanted speed/ power more than long life; the fuel mixes were mostly all- synthetic oil for those.

With the advent of new metallurgy for model engines, I am using 22% oil fuels, half castor, for ABC stuff.


K.


.

Roy DeCamara · Apr 20, 2001 12:45 AM

RE: Castor percentages & etc. #11 source
To Jim - I tried R-50 because I wanted to add about 3% synthetic to act as a detergent and shopped the local motorcycle shops for klotz. What I found was the R-50 and reading the container, sounded like the right stuff. I found it would not readily mix with castor fuel. I contacted Klotz and found that R-50 is not for model engine use. The correct product is KL-200, the orginal synthetic oil by klotz. If I had known the correct company name and contacted them first, I'd have saved some time and money. My serch engine didn't respond to "klotz" for some reason and I got the name off the bottle of R-50. Also, thanks Brett, you confirmed what I've suspected about Red Max all along. Shame too, I used to buy fuel from them and it was nice to be able to order it custom mixed to ones own specs. Regards, Roy D

Steve Helmick · Apr 22, 2001 02:42 PM

RE: Castor percentages & etc. #12 source
I used synthetic oil in all the speed fuel I used to make, way back when, and while some engines got scorched, it was mostly from pushing the engines pretty hard, blown glowplug seals, lean needle settings, shaft runs, cracked pistons, etc. K&B Speed Fuel of the time used soybean oil, and it was not good, seperating in cool weather, and pistons got very rough from a lean run. The alternative Fox Blast was only 50% nitro, and I tried it some, but had the same problem, seperating castor oil forming white globs in cool weather. So it was natural enough to go synthetic when I started mixing my own, and never felt that it didn't do it's job, always running 65% to 75% nitro, and 15% to 25% oil.
I do think that castor is an important part of 4-2-4 tuning, but some synthetic to keep the engine a bit cleaner can't be all bad. SIG sells or used to sell "Lubricin", a 1% or so detergent additive that may be just what Roy wants. As to Randy's point about the Stalker vs. the Fox fuel recommendations, if you look at the metallurgy of both, they are like night and day. They are using aerospace metallurgy, while our model engines use commercial grades. Their chrome is said to be harder, pistons have more silicon, and even the bronze bushings are better. Since they don't have much aerospace industry now, the materials are available to model engine production, most of which is done by aerospace types anyway. As for the Klotz oils, they have been used for years in model engines and are excellent quality. I would be very willing to use them while following engine manufacturer's and/or tuner's recommendations. Steve