Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Carbon Fiber Veil

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 16 of 16 known posts recovered

GLBahrman · May 06, 2006 11:52 PM

#0 source
Which weight should I use to cover my Magnum fuse. Art's Hobby has 10 gram and 17 gram.
Thanks

Greg L. Bahrman

Sparky12366 · May 07, 2006 06:59 AM

#1 source
LAST EDITED ON May-07-06 AT 07:02 AM (CST)
 
>Which weight should I use to cover my Magnum fuse. Art's
>Hobby has 10 gram and 17 gram.
>Thanks

Neither use .02

Aerospace composites

357 Stealth Court
Livermore, CA 94551
Order Desk: (800)811-2009 Technical Assistance: (925)443-5900
FAX (925)443-5901

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

GLBahrman · May 07, 2006 10:22 AM

#2 source
Thanks Sparky

Greg L. Bahrman

Brett Buck · May 08, 2006 09:53 AM

#8 source
>>Which weight should I use to cover my Magnum fuse. Art's
>>Hobby has 10 gram and 17 gram.
>>Thanks
>
>Neither use .02
>
>Aerospace composites
>
>357 Stealth Court
>Livermore, CA 94551
>Order Desk: (800)811-2009 Technical Assistance:
>(925)443-5900
>FAX (925)443-5901

Also, specify "soft" veil!!! There are two kinds, one that looks very uniform and is relatively stiff, and a different kind that is sort of uneven and fuzzy. You want the uneven and fuzzy kind, NOT the uniform and stiff kind. The reason the "stiff' kind is stiff is that it has much more sizing holding the fibers togethers and that sizing is paint-proof, leading to pinholes. The pinholes on my (now wrecked) Infinity probably kept me out of 3-4 Walker flyoffs.

Brett

captcurt · May 08, 2006 11:17 AM

#10 source
When I asked Aerospace about the two types, they indicated to me that ALL of their veil products were of the "soft" variety now.

FWIW

Curt

captcurt · May 07, 2006 11:48 AM

#3 source
My experience with Arts is that it uses the solvent proof binder so will not lay down well in dope or epoxy except on simple curves or flats.

The Aerspace Composites that Sparky recomends is all made with the proper binder. the .2 oz stuff is correct.

Curt

GLBahrman · May 07, 2006 02:22 PM

#4 source
Thanks Curt

Greg L. Bahrman

Iskandar Taib · May 07, 2006 09:48 PM

#5 source
>The Aerspace Composites that Sparky recomends is all made
>with the proper binder. the .2 oz stuff is correct.

But I thought he said .02. Maybe he's got a secret source..

Sparky12366 · May 07, 2006 10:19 PM

#6 source
LAST EDITED ON May-07-06 AT 10:20 PM (CST)
 
TWO TENTHS

Clear enough?

Robert Storick
AMA 12366
Saint Louis,MO.

cyberflyer · May 08, 2006 09:57 AM

#9 source
No need to shout.

Cy

captcurt · May 08, 2006 07:18 AM

#7 source
He did but I'm sure it was just a typo.

Curt

ama21835 · May 08, 2006 11:33 AM

#11 source
LAST EDITED ON May-08-06 AT 11:40 AM (CST)
 
OK, I figured it out...

The stuff is 0.2 ounces per square yard.

It mikes to 0.002" inches thick.

It sounds like we're mixing weight & thickness.

captcurt · May 08, 2006 04:38 PM

#12 source
I have never seen anyone refer to dry (unimpregnated ) fabrics in any way but weight per sq yard or meter.

Many then sell or refer to the same stuff once it has been put into a matrix by the finished panel thickness.

Curt

Brett Buck · May 08, 2006 04:55 PM

#13 source
>OK, I figured it out...
>
>The stuff is 0.2 ounces per square yard.
>
>It mikes to 0.002" inches thick.
>
>It sounds like we're mixing weight & thickness.


No, it's bit of typing dyslexia - .02 instead of 0.2.

BTW, it's just a hair less than that - something like .175 oz/sq yard

Brett

R11301 · May 09, 2006 10:21 AM

#14 source
Is this what Aerospace Products calls "carbon mat"? It's the only thing in there catalog that I could find at .2oz. There "Areo Vail" had no weight rating.

Leonard Rennick

GLBahrman · May 09, 2006 01:37 PM

#15 source
Is this what Aerospace Products calls "carbon mat"?

YES

Greg L. Bahrman