>.It seems rare
>to find articles in SN
>that deal with actual flying
>technique, tips on flying the
>pattern, issues and help with
>particular maneuvers, like the overheads,
>squares, discussions on competition techniques,
>etc. from the top competitors
>with maybe an interview or
>Q/A article with the Top
>experts (read Dave, Ted, Brett,
>et. al.)
Brian: Your questions and suggestions are sound. I think the real reason you don't see as much about this is that most feel the techniques have not changed, but the technology does. Consequently, those who are working on the techniques are now working on the technology. But there are many like you (and me) still working on the techniques. For that matter, I guess we all do. I guess a column could be added to SN, but then that columnist would need material. In a magazine there seems to be the feeling that we should not repeat what we have done in the past, and we constantly have new people arriving who have not read the past.
>Since I am a lowly
>beginner/intermediate wannabe
>I certainly am not qualified
>to contribute. I do realize that
>it takes time and a lot of
>effort to put together articles
>for publication and I am grateful
>for those that do contribute.
One great contribution you can make is ask questions. All of the people you mentioned are active on this forum. If you want questions answered, why not ask them here? I have been promoting this for a long time that people ask specific questions about flying the pattern? Even here on the forum most of the material seems to be on the technology and not on the flying itself. Ask questions (one at a time) about each segment of the pattern that you are having difficulty with and you will get immediate, and helpful, answers. Not everyone is on the internet, so publishing some of the material once again in Stunt News could be helpful, but you are here and you have questions.
>I do think we tend to get
>carried away a bit about
>the models, building techniques, painting,
>etc.(which are great) and forget
>that the other half of
>the sport is actually flying
>these things with as much
>PRECISION as we can...
>Brian
You are right. There are a lot of sport flyers out there who think if they just had the "perfect" plane, then they, too, cold fly the perfect pattern. There is a lot more that goes into the flying of these things than the building of them, although each aspect is important. And if you don't have a good flying plane with a good power plant, you won't have a good flight.