Jim Brooks · May 23, 2002 07:28 AM
#0 sourceSomeone mentioned in an earlier discussion that the secret was 25% oil which I haven't tried yet--can anyone suggest something that I didn't check??
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 28 of 28 known posts recovered
Hope it helps.
Alan
DMoon
Also, is the hole in the spray bar aimed correctly (somewhere in the "down" direction)? Are you using a rear or front needle? An OS or a "something else"?
Leonard Neumann
Aaaaaaaaah!
If you haven't already tried it, add a small amount (just a spritz) of Armorall into your fuel. That should stop any foaming.
Alan
You also said that you would change it 500 rpms on the ground. that sounds like alot. Maybe just try a 100 up at a time.
I set my 46 to just be in a beeping 4s. You know kind of back and forth between the 2 and the 4.(9000) I run a 12.25X3.75 apc. The length of the 12 6 gave you enough load to keep it in check. Still it sounds like something is a miss.
You said plastic uniflow. I run the plastic Sullivan clunk tank setup just like the RC application with the extra vent line added for fueling. I pressure the vent line. They show on the instructions how to set it up and it works well. I have also had very good luck with a uniflow tank(the only time I have ever had luck with one by the way) on uniflow I pressure the uniflow line so I guess it isnt uniflow. I do this because it gets better milage and I can get through the pattern without a runout. I think the plastic one will work fine for you. Make sure the pickup is inline with the needle. Remember the clunk slides up as the plane flies. The clunk sits in a straight line with the brass tube it is attached to. So where the brass tube exits the tanks is where you should set it up even with the needle.
Also Len brings up a good point about the hole in the spraybar. Make sure it is pointing down or a little down and forward would be best.
How did it run on the bench? Would it needle well? Could you pinch the fuel line and have it go lean and come right back? Did you break it in fast or sloppy rich or in the middle? A little fast with an occansional 4s works well for OS engines. They have a medium taper and they seat nice and quick.
If it needles fine on the ground and then in the air goes to the crapper. You might have a bad gallon of fuel. I fought one for an entire day(9 flights) then someone said here try my fuel and WHAM it was working great. I had some of the same stuff you are having. Unpreditable runs and junk like that.
DMoon
ST needle valve. Now we are getting somewhere. The .265 venturi is way too small for the ST needle. (This is a good size for the .40 with an OS needle). Even the .285 is too small with an ST needle and the .46. I would go to at least a .297 or .301. You can go as high as a .312 or even .316 with the boost port blocked and everything else right.
Also, make sure there is no leaking around the venturi o-ring. Sometimes when people bore the cross hole for the larger needle, things get a little off. You should have to compress the o-ring by pushing down on the venturi when inserting the needle. If it just slides in without any "juggling" you are probably sucking air around the venturi.
Leonard Neumann
Yup. Can't breathe
Leonard Neumann
Put a mac's muffler on it and run it at 10,300 on the ground and have fun.10%nitro 25%Castor 11.5x4 apc Prop
So here's my questions>>>>>Is your plane a profile? What tank r u running now? How far from the engine is it? What size fuel tubing are u useing? How old is your fuel? How many head gaskets?
Scott(got to know) Riese
Fred
It leaves the ground at 9350 rpm in a two stroke, makes one lap at that spedd and then settles into an awesome 2-4 break. The muffler is Big Art's (Double Star) on muffler pressure. I hope this helps....
CML
NOT THE SAME ANIMAL>>>>>>>>>>>
scott( sorry had to do it) Riese
Ted
p.s. If this tip solves your problem thank Big Jim Greenaway who saved me a very distressing nats with ST .46s many years ago.
Lewis (just my opinion) Lingwood

>I ran the thing last
>night and it's absolutely
>great. I launch it
>very wet and it comes
>in a bit in the
>air, and a whole lot
>vertical.
>Funny thing--the TT.42 can barely do
>the pattern with the 4
>oz.tank in the plane, while
>the .46 does about 15
>laps at the end on
>the same tank, and the
>plane seems to have more
>oomph with the 46.
>I'm looking forward to flying
>it at Brodak's.
Jim;
Interesting.
Just to look at the numbers, what would be some of the differences between the setup of the two engines? Is the TT 42 running with the boost port blocked? (We know that the LA 46 comes without a boost port). What are the sizes of the venturis? More appropriately, after taking into consideration the NVA, what is the effective choke size?
Regards - Bob Kruger
I would be interested in this, too. The TT .42, although outwardly it looks a bit like an FP copy, is a different engine altogether inside. Different bore, stroke. No parts interchangeability. The LA, on the other hand, is the same bore/stroke as the FP (The LA 40 compared to the FP 40). Just uses a different piston, cylinder (thinner liner). The LA even uses the same crankshaft (now cast instead of fully machined out of bar stock) as the FP as well as the con rod and venturi. And so does the 46. Same shaft, con rod, venturi as the 35/40 FP. This may account for some of the "friendliness" of the engine (with a loss of power) as it is very much choked down. It could also explain better fuel mileage is you are having to run it leaner. The LA, if it is using the stock venturi, is using a .265 venturi with a .135 spray bar. What is the setup on your .42, out of curiosity?
Leonard Neumann
The venturi you are using is too small for this engine, even if it were stock, if you are using the ST needle. I will typically go to a .297 or even .301 venturi on these engines with an ST needle, blocked boost port, and other modifications.
Do that, and then compare it with the stock LA 46.
Leonard Neumann