>
>>The time in R/C was not a total loss though. I did learn to
>>like our plug in wings on my 35% IMAC planes. Like Steve and
>>others have suggested, I too think plug in outer wings would
>>be a big help to us all.
>>
>>It is very easy to do, and can be done with no weight gain.
>>If you get a chance, please look at a Horizon models Mini
>>Funtana Electric ARF. These removable, plug in wings are
>>about the same size as your P-38 removable outer panels will
>>be. This would make transporting the plane Sooooooo much
>>easier. And it would also make building a lot easier too.
>>The lead outs could easily be clepped on through a hatch in
>>the center section, or ...?
>>###############################################################
>Would having only the outer wing panel removable be of
>enough help? That way you wouldn't need to mess with the
>controls.
Good idea Phil,
It would help a lot. A 61" wing glued to a long twin fuselage would make a very large and awkward load in any car or van. Anything we can do to help this would be an improvement. Your idea would meet the KIS rule, and help. The 2/3 wing would be the size of a FS at aprox. 42". Still a van full, but better!
It is amazing how easy it is to carry, transport, and store a .40 -.60 size plane when it is in two parts. My guess is that with more "Retreads" returning to CL from R/C we may soon see more 2 (or 3) piece CL planes.
IMHO, I think we in CL can learn from the "take apart" ideas from the R/C world. CF tubing is very strong and light and it makes great wing joiners while serving double duty as the wing spar. ... Time will tell? 