Flite Streak
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 18 of 18 known posts recovered
Cowboystunt1 · Oct 05, 2006 06:45 PM
#1 sourceWithout the "fancy tips" the airplane will still fly OK.
It will fly a little better with them on however because leaving them off represents a significant reduction in wing area.
Don't leave the stationary flaps off because they do also add a significant amount of wing area.
My reccommendations would be to put the tips on...making sure they are straight and not twisted or warped. If you are concerned about them being easy to break you could reinforce them with light 1/8 inch thick strips about 1/4 inch wide all around the outside on both sides of the tip. This also makes covering them a little easier.
Randy C
SAVE ALL THE PIECES-Phil Brown
JAKinHouston · Oct 05, 2006 07:31 PM
#3 source>If I ever build another one of these, I will copy the tips
>in thin plywood and brace them very well. I have trouble
>covering tips like this in Monokote.
The FS tips are a pain I grant. Those on the Peacemaker (UK) I think are easier to do. Loss of wing area of course means higher wing loading, less lift and higher speeds needed in consequence to make up for it (turning circle is reduced some as well). Is that going to hurt? Well, the rocket dudes can probably explain it better than I can, but if you are a newbie the last thing you want is a faster higher loaded airplane. It might not be enough of a loss though to be really noticeable tho...
JAK
It is difficult to get and keep the original FS tips straight through building and covering. If they come out warped, they are just like a trim tab confounding wings level flight.
For aesthetics, you might put on a light 1/2 balsa tip block similar to the ringmaster tips.
Jim
Please repair all divots
glenwearden · Oct 05, 2006 08:19 PM
#5 sourceGlen Wearden
A clunk tank is nice.
Paul Taylor
~I wish I knew everything you have forgotten about C/L.
Check out my Blog@
http://rootbeard.rcuniverse.com
A link to a slide show of a fun day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-_sR0ZydSQ
What engine? An LA25 will make for a mild mannered stunt trainer. Very useful, if that's you're interest. A rockin and rollin 40 will make for a hot rod and lots of laughs.
Do the wingtips, take out as many wrinkles as you can, don't worry about it. Covering the wingtips section by section should help keep most wrinkles out, if you want to go through the trouble.
The leading edge is a troublesome two part glue up, if you're using the Brodak plans. Can convert to a standard 1/2" or 3/8" square leading edge like the ARF. I've built three of these and assembled one ARF. All great flyers, lots of fun. Built light like the ARF and powered with an LA25 will make for a forgiving no muss no fuss flyer. This design is in balance, leave it as it is. IMHO. A 3.25oz chicken hopper fits back there. Good enough for a 40, if you're flying it for sport. More than you need for a 25, enough for the entire pattern when using a 25. Other 3oz with bottom exit pickups also fit and work.
Keep the wing as straight as possible. If you're using the two part trailing edge, jig it up and keep checking. I put in webbing between the ribs along the trailing edge. Use light balsa. I also web between the main spars. This helps lock out the warps.
Cover top and bottom of one side before doing the final high shrink heating of the monokote. Watch this. It's easy to throw the wing off kilter by shrinking one side real tight
before covering the other side. Go side to side tightening up the panels. Watch the rudder. Make sure it's on there vertically with very little offset. It's a big area fin, can throw the trim off big time unless on their 90 degrees to the wing. Makes a big difference in line tension between inside and outside maneuvers.
If the plane feels a bit jumpy go to a narrower line spread at the handle.
If you're using a mild 25 aircraft ply doublers are o.k. If you aim for a 40, definitely use five ply.
Make sure the wing fuse joint is tight and epoxied all the way through.
Make sure the stabilizer is trued to the wing.
Sounds like you'd want to start off with a mild mannered 25 for power. The LA or possibly the Brodak. (I don't have any experience with the Brodak, but it sounds all right.) An FP 20 or 25 should also do it.
An excellent flexible design. A true classic.
russell shaffer · Oct 05, 2006 09:44 PM
#9 sourceBob Reeves · Oct 05, 2006 09:02 PM
#8 sourceLight weight, thick enough to make covering easier and won't warp. I took advantage of the hollow tips and used the outboard for an adjustable tip weight box and the inboard for adjustable leadouts.
phantomflier · Oct 06, 2006 01:15 AM
#10 sourceThe balance point should be no more than about 1/2 way between the leading edge and spar. Plane will still turn easily but won't be jumpy. Use a 4" bellcrank, won't need the extra leverage but the plane will be easier to fly smoothly and you will still have all the corner you'll need.
The original wing tips are more effecient, but leaving them off won't hurt the performance too much.
As said earlier; don't eliminate the fixed flaps.
Use double landing gear instead of the single plus a tail wheel.
Round the fuselage on top and bottom. Doesn't take much time and looks more professional.
brodak had a "short nose" 3.5 oz uniflow tank that would fit the stock kit.
If the plane weighs anywhere in the 20's it'll easily do the entire pattern. Even in the low 30's you shouldn't have any problems.
Carl
Kreth McKee
AMA 22004
It's 40-45 years (Aaaagh!) since I last saw / flew one
Charles
Steve
Steve Scott · Oct 07, 2006 12:56 PM
#17 source>Anyone got some photos of a Flite Streak?
>
>It's 40-45 years (Aaaagh!) since I last saw / flew one
>
>Charles
[photo not recovered: p7060297.jpg]
Top Flite ARF Flite Streak, OS 20 FP for power, APC 9-4 prop, Hayes 3oz plastic fuel tank. Flies on 60'x.012" lines using Sig Champion 10% nitro fuel.