Twin engine stunt?
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 17 of 17 known posts recovered
Kiwi
Brett Buck · Dec 28, 2000 12:23 AM
#2 source>stunt? My partner and
>I built a profile "saw
>a picture of it once"
>scale Fw 189 with two
>fox 35's and later two
>0S 40's.
I've never flown a twin, but some masochistic lunatic built a quad, and I flew that. It was pretty good.
Brett
The basic framework: spars, center ribs, tailfeathers, and fuselages, is sitting on the work bench ready for glue. I assembled it last night and decided (with unusual wisdom) to let it sit until I could approach it in daylight, bright-eyed and bushytailed.
I might note that the single has a ST G20-15 diesel, and looks like it is going to be fine. However, the twin has glo engines; I'm not up to a twin diesel yet.
Jim Thomerson
John Miller · Dec 28, 2000 08:49 AM
#4 sourceHe encouraged me to build a Twin Flite Streak for classic competition. It's 79+ inches in span, uses a pair of .20's. It flies the pattern quite well even though it has no flaps. I would recommend this plane to anyone who wants a competitive classic legal twin.
John
Willis Swindell · Dec 28, 2000 03:20 PM
#5 sourceWillis
How about a Cessna 210 for really pushing the envelope? A high wing twin, crossing two stunt barriers at once.
Willis will tell you how to start the rear engine without breaking the booms.
Larry F
Willis Swindell · Dec 28, 2000 07:58 PM
#7 sourceBeing a pitman for all the racing events and combat for 35 years I don’t flip props with my fingers, I use a starter. The rear engine is above the stab so it is a strait shot to the spinner. Starting the engine is no problem, but after it starts you then have to remove every thing and move to the front, reverse the starter, and reconnect, While moving around the holder. While at a contest you really have to hustle to finish your flight in the time allotted. This is what led to the Hinkle 219 easier to start.
Willis
As we get older, the balsa hormones begin to dominate.
Larry F
Larry F
First was a profile Me110 from Aeromodeller plans, flew well with 2 OS Max25's.
Sold it without engines before emigrating to Australia 20 yrs ago, still wish I'd kept it.
Next I built a 56 inch span, 650 (or so)square inches and put the Os engines on it.I made a foam wing for it, 2 inches thick.
It flies better than the Me110 did due ( I think ) to the larger wing.
They are a blast to fly, the engines beat together to produce a beautiful sound.
Dave Moffitt
I've built sterling p-38. DMeco A/2 built a twin or 2 r/c but hit my stride in my 20's. A thread from isg
Yea, I thought 4 OS FPs and a central pressure bladder for a tank was pretty cool, if you like that much work. 
Randy
20 years ago, I scratch-built a twin boomer around a Shoestring wing, and made the tips a bit longer. I designed it around two McCoy .19 Series 21s (the ugly square ones, with the finned case), which was a mistake, because it will be too nose heavy.
I haven't flown it yet,it is hanging in the workshop, and there are artful spider webs transversing the booms as I type this...
Currell
It was copied after the Scientific series of profile models and flew very well. I love the sound of 2 engines coming into sync.
"SAVE ALL THE PIECES"-Phil Brown
Bob Balsie · Jan 03, 2001 07:59 PM
#16 sourceBob