Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Sterling Flying Fool?

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 16 of 16 known posts recovered

Hofacker · Aug 19, 2002 02:56 PM

#0 source
Is the Sterling "Flying Fool" OTS legal? Does any one remember this one? What is the wing span/area?

Currell · Aug 19, 2002 03:28 PM

#1 source
No. It came out in the late '50s.

You don't want to use it, anyway.

Tip of the E Z Just if you placed in any competition (Classic?) with it.

Currell

Ty M> · Aug 19, 2002 03:42 PM

#2 source
I have a photo of one at a contest in 1967. The first name and the last name says it all. Sterling-blank-fool. It had a wingspan of about 24 inches, and did not fly all that well let alone do anything precision.

barenekd · Aug 19, 2002 06:07 PM

#3 source
>Is the Sterling "Flying Fool" OTS
>legal? Does any one remember
>this one? What is the
>wing span/area?


The Flying Fool is not OT legal. The wingspan is about 32" and it has about 300 sq.in. They are fun to fly, but are a real challenge to get through the whole stunt pattern, but they will do the eights.

Bare

TomN · Aug 19, 2002 06:59 PM

#4 source
I can remember when I was a kid, a group of us had a ball with a "Fool" intentional setting it rich and doing touch & goes... Not too good for much else though. Only Classic legal, I would also tip my hat to you if you won anything with it.. just a have fun .. sport airplane.

Tom N.

Tom N

The Kiwi · Aug 19, 2002 07:21 PM

Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#5 source
But just for fun flying, if someone wants a biplane that actually flies fairly well, build a Brodak 38 Special. The Atlanta Stunt Conspiracy puts on a biplane stunt event every year, and this was Tom Dixon's answer to the event.

Scracth-build a box side/top/bottom fuselage to save a little weight and improve the looks. It can look "cuter" than the Fool without sacrificing being able to stunt some. But don't expect to earn large points for landings. CL bipes put on the air brakes when the engine shuts down. You have to dive for the ground fast to maintain control.


K.

*

jetjock · Aug 19, 2002 07:37 PM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#6 source
Anybody tried Brodak's Bi-Slob? It looks interestin'...I may stick one together this winter.

denlip · Aug 19, 2002 09:02 PM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#7 source
jetjock, first you have to be able to get the kit. I'm under the impression that it hasn't been released yet.

Hofacker · Aug 20, 2002 06:36 AM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#8 source
>But just for fun flying, if
>someone wants a biplane that
>actually flies fairly well, build
>a Brodak 38 Special.
>The Atlanta Stunt Conspiracy puts
>on a biplane stunt event
>every year, and this was
>Tom Dixon's answer to the
>event.
>
>Scracth-build a box side/top/bottom fuselage to
>save a little weight and
>improve the looks. It
>can look "cuter" than the
>Fool without sacrificing being able
>to stunt some. But
>don't expect to earn large
>points for landings. CL
>bipes put on the air
>brakes when the engine shuts
>down. You have to
>dive for the ground fast
>to maintain control.
>
>
>K.
>
>*

Yeah, no kidding about the air brakes when the engine quits... I had a profile Spad many years ago and it would just about fall out of the air. How well did that large triplane do that I've seen pictures of here recently?

Circle Mouse Mary · Aug 20, 2002 10:34 AM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#9 source
If you want to punish yourself with a Flying Fool, I'll let you enter any contest I CD for OTS even though it doesn't qualify. Even give you a thirty point bonus!

Al "I'm building a Humongous" K.

Al Knight · Aug 20, 2002 11:36 AM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#10 source
I've been messing with a recently obtained "Moitle" biplane which is very nostalgic but doesn't fly worth a darned. Has to go 100mph to work or it stalls like mad. Looks great hanging from the ceiling in my office. I think "Over Easy" works OK and the Jim Hunt Great Lakes biplane is supposed to perform. I've got one of those started with plans to build two.

...and for the Bi-Slob question,
You've never had as much fun 'till you build one of these. Not legal for OTS. Just good, clean, greasy fun. When the kits come out we should organize an all Bi-Slob multi event contest. We did a Bi-Slob freestyle stunt event a number of years ago with about 5 entries. The kit is due any day now.

Al

chubahkah · Aug 20, 2002 12:11 PM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#11 source
Can anyone point me towards a web based picture of a "BI-SLOB""
- Thanks - Chubahkah

LNeumann · Aug 20, 2002 12:20 PM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#12 source
>Can anyone point me towards a
>web based picture of a
>"BI-SLOB""
>- Thanks - Chubahkah

Try this: Just be aware that the kit hasn't been released yet.

http://www.brodak.com/catalog/kitsdetail.cfm?myindex=CLB-56


Leonard Neumann

Leonard Neumann

TomN · Aug 20, 2002 07:09 PM

RE: Re: Biplanes for OTS, should've been some!#13 source
Jetjock,
You can also get a copy of the June 1992 Flying Models from Flying Models. (Also the plans) We had a great time putting the article together. Bob Hunt and my son, Craig, and I froze the day we took the flying pictures though. It was about 18 degrees with a 25 mph wind!

Tom Niebuhr

Tom N

Floyd C · Aug 20, 2002 09:18 PM

#14 source
This is a wonderful plane! It flies great! I dont think it would be much good in a competition though it might if you are good enough. I have loved mine to death. It is one of my all time favorites, along with the ringmaster and most other sterling kits.

Currell · Aug 20, 2002 10:05 PM

#15 source
Floyd: Rare agreement with you. Haven't flown the Slob yet, but I remember Sterling kits going back to the late '50s, when they had decent wood.

The Ring is no Streak, but I like it for some reason. The styling is an acquired taste, certainly. There are a couple of lightish Rings here in the Detroit area that fly quite surprisingly well.

Currell