sig magnum ?
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 5 of 5 known posts recovered
Joe Bellcrank · Jan 16, 2001 09:51 PM
#1 sourceThe Cardinal Profile is one of the better performing profiles available. It's sized right to fly well with a good .40 sized engine. It's even better with a ST.46 if you have one available.
The Magnum often winds up building a bit on the heavier side. A .40 sized engine is often not enough. If you have that ST 46, a .51, or .60, or equivilant, you will have a good performer.
So perhaps you might want to consider which engines you might have available. If a suitable engine is not a problem, why not build them both, that way you will have two great flying planes.
John
Brett Buck · Jan 16, 2001 10:19 PM
#2 source>out there,i saw one fly
>last fall and it looked
>pretty good,are there any pitfalls
>i should look for?,my next
>project will be the magnum
>or a profile cardinal,i have
>both kits.
Either will do fine. I would point out that Todd Lee seemed to do OK with his modified Magnum, beating your's truly and a host of others to finish second. It was somewhat modified structurally and cosmetically, but I think it was close to stock aerodynamically.
Brett
Nils
RocketCityJim · Jan 17, 2001 11:47 AM
#4 source1. Use the lighest wood possible for planking the wing, and do it with care so that it will be as light as possible!
2. If you use the wing mounted landing gear, definitely use gear rib clips glued into the foam leading edge!
3. Do not cut down on flap area unless you can build it weighing less than 54 ounces (unlikely)!
4. You may be able to extend the tailwheel wire slightly and still have enough prop clearance. Makes landings a little easier.
5. When joining the wings/stab use fiberglass on the seams then overlap silkspan across the center sections (helps strengthen the joint considerably.
6. Do whatever it takes to keep the weight under 57 ounces and you will have a good flying plane!
RCJ