Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Why do we crash?

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 31 of 31 known posts recovered

LNeumann · Jan 17, 2001 07:29 PM

#0 source
One of the hardest things for the beginner to learn is to practice his maneuvers high. If you were flying in a full-size plane and wanting to learn to become a low level acrobatic pilot, you wouldn't practice the maneuvers down low. You would go up to a higher altitude and practice until you got to where you were comfortable enough to bring them down to a lower altitude. The same thing goes for our planes. Practice at higher altitudes until you get the shapes down. Then, and only then, should you even consider bringing the maneuver down to the prescribed five foot level.

When we are first learning to fly our airplanes, even level flight is difficult. Until we get it down, crashes are inevitable. Then, when we learn to fly inverted, the same thing holds true. Crashes, again, are inevitable. But, once we have learned the basics of flying--upright, inverted, loops, eights--then we should be pretty much past crashing...if we practice at a high enough altitude, and if our equipment doesn't fail us.

Since a lot of people seem to still crash nearly every time they go flying, I started this thread to find out why and how we could help. Why did you crash the last time you were out (or the time before that, or the time...) and is there something you have learned or something we could help you with to prevent it from happening again?

Even the experts will still crash occasionally, either from equipment failure or from stupidity (yes, even the experts will occasionally have one of those days). But even the beginning and intermediate flyers should be able to expect to go out and fly with the confidence that they can bring their planes home alive.

So...why do we crash? What problems are you experiencing or what have you learned that you can pass on to others?

Leonard Neumann

Bob Reeves · Jan 17, 2001 08:42 PM

#1 source
Last time I crashed was the result of just plain not paying attention. I had my Flight Streak out in the snow and was just messing around doing consecutive figure eight's. On about the 5th one I simply put the bottom of the outside loop about a foot to low.

After learning inverted flight 75% of my crashes were some form of the above stupidity, the other 25% were engine quiting in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I would guess it is probably the same for most...

Bob

Randy · Jan 17, 2001 09:05 PM

#2 source
LAST EDITED ON Jan-17-01 AT 09:08 PM (EST)

Don't know why you crash Len

For myself, the last 2 crashes I had were stupid equipment failure. I the last case, I was flying in relatively heavy wind (what contest doesn't have wind?) and the exhaust header gasket blew out just as I was climbing into the wind on the wingover. About 50 feet off the ground. All the power went bye-bye. Time was, I might have ran and saved it, but I just don't run that fast anymore. So, deceleration trauma.

The time before that, I was flying an official flight at a contest in heavy wind (see a pattern here) and on the down side of the 3 outside loop, the stabilizer failed and splat, concrete poisoning.

Both time I destroyed the engine, plane and carbon prop. Windy may be able to fix anything, but I say, if the plane is in more pieces than before you built, it's time to retire it.

Man, that SV-11 with the blown header gasket really EXPLODED on impact. I knew it was pretty lightly built, but, WOW.

What I've learned is to ALWAYS check your equipment closely and if somethings looks questionable, don't fly the plane. Occasionally take an airplane apart (gear off, engine and tank out, etc.) and really check things over. And don't skimp on things like primary reinforcment when building in an effort to build a lighter plane. Use common sense.

Randy

LNeumann · Jan 17, 2001 10:07 PM

#5 source
Responding to Randy, equipment failure is what usually gets the more experienced flyer. To me, these are the hardest to take. We can kick ourselves, scold ourselves, say all sorts of things to ourselves when we do something truly dumb. We can even learn from our mistakes and try not to do that again. But when something fails on our plane that we had no control over... Well, we can still learn from those experiences, too, but it seems harder.

If it makes you feel any better (It won't) we, also, had that header gasket blow out...and not once--several times. It didn't result in a crash, however, and the ultimate answer was to scratch the header gasket and use lock tite on the bolts. Once they were put on with lock tite, they have never been loose or off since. Of course, we still learn from those experiences.

Same with something breaking. If the tail broke, you know it wasn't strong enough and needs to be stronger on the next one. When a plane crashes we can see what was built too light and what was built too strong. If it breaks in the air, then we definitely know what was built too light.

Now the wind may have been a factor in the latter case, adding to the flight stresses, but only you know if it was too windy to fly on that day or not. That is the one bad thing about contest flying (OK, there is more than one bad thing, but that is one of them). All too often there is wind. If we were home, we wouldn't be flying in the stuff, but since we came to the contest, well..? Sometimes it is alright to say it is too windy and leave the plane in the car. But there is still that pressure that we put on ourselves. In having made the effort to get there, we think we now need to fly--regardless of the weather. And then, if we should end up crashing the plane, we suffer through the "thousand regrets" on the way home as we say over and over again, "I shouldn't have flown that last flight. I shouldn't..."

Leonard Neumann

Steve Helmick · Jan 17, 2001 10:15 PM

#6 source
Randy, I saw you do an outside "baseball slide" crash at Kent! Was that the one? I thought Dave G. had that model now. Well, anyway, I think one thing that REALLY makes a big difference is to know what you are trying to do before you reach the pullout at 10'. I had one flyin' buddy that managed to bash two of my airplanes just because he didn't know what was next. Flying the stunt pattern takes care of that, and it also takes care of the time concern, or should. The last three times I crashed...two were control failures in models given to me or purchased cheap while I was in college. The last one was flying an FAI T/R without a circle center marker...hit the toolbox on landing. Dizziness didn't help. The control failures: One had the pushrod lap jointed, soldered but not bound with copper wire. The other had the pushrod fall off a control horn. They were about 30 years ago.
Well, I did spin in a Nordic Glider or two, dumped in a Wakefield due to a bad launch, and blew up an FAI Power model when it DT'd under power (bad engineering). Do they count? Steve

LNeumann · Jan 17, 2001 10:21 PM

#7 source

>Well, I did spin in a
>Nordic Glider or two, dumped
>in a Wakefield due to
>a bad launch, and blew
>up an FAI Power model
>when it DT'd under power
>(bad engineering). Do they count?
> Steve

They all count, Steve. I had a plane given to me that didn't have the belcrank mounted solidly inside the wing. It let go and pulled through each rib, one at a time (splat!). I, also, purchased a plane with a spliced pushrod that failed. I got so I didn't want to fly someone else's build for fear that it wasn't put together properly.


Leonard Neumann

Randy · Jan 20, 2001 04:01 PM

#25 source
Steve,

>>Randy, I saw you do an outside "baseball slide" crash at Kent! Was that the one? I thought Dave G. had that model now. <<

Nope. The plane that Dave has is a Saturn knockoff. It's the one that had the leadout failure and didn't crash (Yeow!). The one with the satb failure was rebuilt and is hanging on my shop wall. It's also the one I retrofitted with a Stalker and pipe to do some testing with. Weighs a ton now, so you probably won't see it at a contest.

The one with the blown header gasket exploded on impact. It's decorating a dump in beautiful Oregon.

Randy

LNeumann · Jan 17, 2001 09:42 PM

#4 source
Two comments I would make here...and what you say is pretty common for a lot of people. Been there, done that myself. However, unless the airplane is expendable and you don't really care, try flying with the bottoms a bit farther off of the ground. Even experts have trouble with perfectly consecutive loops. Watch some of the top 10 flyers and you will, occasionally, see some low pullouts (yes, even they miss occasionally). The difference is, they may miss by two feet, or sometimes 3, but their pullouts are stil at altitude and they continue flying. However, if you tend to miss by more than that, then you need to give yourself more room at the bottom, so, even if you end up missing by 6 feet or 7 feet, there will still be room between your plane and the ground.

My second comment...and, again, this is quite common for beginners and sport flyers (been there, done that myself)...is to watch your time. Since we now generally fly a complete pattern each flight and only a complete pattern, and since we fill the tank a set amount to accomplish the pattern with a measured amount to spare, we don't normally worry about this. It usually takes five minutes, approsimately, to fly a complete pattern. When done, we fly out the tank straight and level. We strive for a 6 minute, 20 second run. Yes, that's over a minute of straight and level before the engine quits. But, it is OK to practice flying level, too. And this way we never worry about whether the engine is going to make it though those last loops (or whatever).

For a sport flyer who is not flying a set pattern this may be more difficult, but the key is to determine how long your engine will normally run on a tank of fuel and then to check your watch periodically. When you start nearing the end of the flight, there is nothing wrong with just pulling out and flying a few laps straight and level. I would rather put in two more boring level laps than I intended, than to have the engine quit two laps sooner than I thought it would.

The first objective of every flight, the thing you should be telling yourself over and over again before you even begin, is to bring it back alive. Bring it back alive. Then set about to do it.

It makes this sport so much more enjoybale when we bring the plane back alive.

Leonard Neumann

Al Hutto · Jan 20, 2001 10:49 AM

#24 source
This is an outstanding series! I can identify with just about every incident mentioned here. I am a 62 year old retread that should know better on most occasions but, some things take a few crashes to sink in. One thing that is rather strange is that my airplanes seem to fly better after I repair them.
A little story about big airplanes: I was flying in the back seat of a RA5C vigilante over Wachula,Fla. in 1965. The flight was a "chase flight" where we escorted a replacement crew on there first flight in type. We decided to take some vertical air to air photos so we proceded to fly under the other plane so they could take a vertical shot of us. Well my pilot evidently was pulling mack on the control stick as he looked up at the other plane. Our horizonal slab (slab is correct) contacted the other planes radome which broke away and shattered their cockpit windscreen. They ejected, we landed, buried one mach 2 Vigilante in farmers field. The farmer wanted the Navy to leave the crater open so he could have a pond for his cattle!

Jim T. · Jan 17, 2001 09:40 PM

#3 source
I'm glad you asked that. It's very simple.

Crashes are usually the result of incompetence, ignorance, and/or stupidity. A beginner crashes a lot because of incompetence or ignorance. With practice, and increased knowledge, crashes due to incompetence and ignorance become less frequent. Eventually one becomes an expert, and almost all one's crashes are due only to stupidity. One would hope that the learning experience would cause an expert to have fewer stupidity caused crashes than a beginner, but I'm not sure that is the case.

Most of my crashes are the result of very simple mistakes. Mistakes that I know not to make. I like to think that if I make a mistake twice, I have learned my lesson. No need to do it a third time.

Jim

peabody · Jan 17, 2001 10:26 PM

#8 source
Geez Len, you're preaching stuff that makes me crazy! I believe that the most common reason for beginners crashing is that they are too high and run out of airspeed before they realize it.

I urge everyone to BEGIN maneuvers from as low as they can stand.... it allows more room to complete the maneuver. Besides, our little aeroplanes don't fly nearly as well at 45 or 60 degrees as they do level.

Beginners overcontrol. I urge folks to be gentle! If you give something full up to begin the loop, where are you going to go when it looks as if you're going to crash?

Level flight is tough.... at a stunt clinic, I put poles marked at 4-6' around, and the field was littered with balsa wood! Even "good" guys fly too high.

See Ya

peabody

LNeumann · Jan 17, 2001 10:49 PM

#9 source
I am not talking 45 degrees. (With 60 foot lines, what would that be, 40 some feet?) I am just advocating starting at 10 or 15 feet off the ground. Even if a loop becomes a "figure 9", which would be the result of overcrontroling going up, then not turning tight enough coming down, that leaves with (hopefully) room to spare at the bottom.

But, quite frankly, this is the way we worked with Matthew. We started him high and taught him the shapes. He had room to play with and we went several years without a single crash. In fact, he flew through Intermediate and it wasn't until he reached Advanced that we finally pulled him down to the 5 foot level. Yes, he lost points at the contests because he was flying high. I don't think he ever won anything while flying Intermediate (first, second, or third). But once he got the shapes down and was confident enough to move his maneuvers down to the proper level, he began to win.

I truly believe we do beginner and Intermediate flyers a disservice by stressing that 5 foot level. Flying 10 foot bottoms is so much easier because it gives them room to miss and takes the fear out of the maneuver.

Of course, if their plane isn't trimmed properly and they are having loss of tension as they get up to or pass the 45 degree level, then we have another problem that we need to address. If we were sitting in that plane that was attempting to learn to do maneuvers with five foot bottoms, it might make it a bit easier to understand the need to gain a little altitude while we learn the shapes before we try it at the lowest levels.

Leonard Neumann

Crist Rigotti · Jan 17, 2001 10:52 PM

#10 source
The last time I crashed was when doing inverted flight..straight and level. I was working on getting it down lower from the 10 to 15 feet that I usually fly inverted to the 6 foot level. I was windy that day and I felt I needed the windy weather practice. All was going well and on the 2 lap I could tell the plane was sinking slowly. I thought all was still OK till I went downwind and then it settled even more. Well, I began to really notice how low it had gotten and I was just a few feet away from entering my 3 outside loops.......next thing I know my fun was over! It happened real quick. Went in inverted just a moment before pushing in the down. The windy weather caused the airplane to sink on the downwind side. I knew this could happen and was just too slow to react. I really was too low in the first place! For the rest of the season I flew my inverted no lower than 10 feet. It really spooked me. Something I'm going to work on early this season.

Crist

Lsg3240 · Jan 18, 2001 01:10 AM

#11 source
Last two times I crashed were due to losing the position of the airplane relative to the ground in an overhead 8. Pilot error pure and simple. Still trying to figure out the cure. Both were lost at approximatly the same spot in the manuever. Neither crash was fatal to the model.

Nils · Jan 18, 2001 02:31 AM

#12 source
LAST EDITED ON Jan-18-01 AT 02:32 AM (EST)

Last summer I was flying my profile Oriental, doing my inverted laps very low, three feet or so, just for the practice, when I felt something. I looked down to see one of those pesky 'skeeters boring a hole in the bottom of my right wrist! I reached under with my left hand & slapped it. Prop, needle, rudder, grass stains. Duh.
Nils

Buzzman · Jan 18, 2001 08:45 AM

#13 source
In the last 4 years I crashed two times. The first on was because the up line broke from the bellcrank at the bottom of the eight. That was a lesson in building and craftsmanship. The second time was on the third flight of a brand new Nobler. Not yet trimmed out it was loosing tension above 45 degrees. Just so happened that the plane was above that height and the motor quit. Not being as quick as I once was I steped back to tighten up the lines and I fell. It was all over in an instant. Luckley, the only damage was a few easily repaired stress cracks and the pilot tryed to bail out thru the canope. From these experiences I can say "Experiance yields good decisions and makes a good pilot and a great flying plane. Unfortunately experiance comes from many bad decisions."

RocketCityJim · Jan 18, 2001 08:47 AM

#14 source
Len,

My last crash - two weeks ago was from simple overconfidence. I was starting to work seriously on my pattern for the upcoming year. While doing the hourglass, I tried to get the bottom at exactly 5 feet, but missed and pulled out at about 2 feet. I overcontrolled the correction and bottomed the plane out destroying my Bolly 3 blade prop and doing some slight damage to the landing gear mout blocks on the Intrepid. The damage is fixed now, you can't tell anything happended to the plane, but that was kinda scary because that's my only really good plane until I can get my next model built. The moral of the stroy here is that if you havn't been flying much and are starting to practice for the upcoming season - just make you first 5 or 6 flights a little on the high side, don't even try for the 5 foot bottoms on you second filght!!

Rocket City Jim

captcurt · Jan 18, 2001 01:12 PM

RE: Why did I crash?#15 source
Last one was from becoming overconfident/comfortable. working on getting size and shape of consecutive outside loops, I was into the second and gave a large plane-following arm movement. At the bottom, I got well ahead of the plane with a sweeping upward arm motion---DUHH!!!. Took me an overnite to figure out why the plane just went over and nearly straight down into the ground. I told it too!!.

Good helpful topic here.

Thanks

Curt

Flyin_Again · Jan 18, 2001 01:32 PM

#16 source
Last year was the first time I've been back at the controls in 30+ years. First of all, I live in an area of no control line fliers, so every flight was from a stooge.

If it hadn't been for all the comments on the various forums I probably will still be trying to build my first model. All the help that I've received from building to flying tips has shown a great improvement in my skills.

On crashing...well I've had a few this past year! I will say once I got to the level of flying 'eights', my crashes have been few and far between. I still fly high, but then again I'm trying to relearn the pattern.

I want to thank all you fellows just for your comments, as they have been an enormous help. I'm looking forward to another progressive flying season. Thanks!

Bill

kdheath · Jan 18, 2001 02:09 PM

#17 source
My last crash was with the infamous FP20 Ringmaster Junior, at the bottom of a veeeerrrrry large outside loop that started about two and one half inches too low. B4 I learned the setup was such a turkey-too much power and weight and too little wing area. Now I know at least a little better.....Trying again this summer with some more proper equipment.

Cary · Jan 18, 2001 03:35 PM

#18 source
Being a recent retread to CL I can tell you that Len is on the mark regarding hight. After several "incidents" that resulted in an opportunity to repair a plane someone suggested that I was flying too low and to bring it up to 15 feet instead of the 6 or so that I was flying. Presto - the crashes, er "incidents" stopped for the most part. The second reason for most the crashes resulted from changing my mind in mid manuver. Seems sort of dumb but I would start a lazy eight and then decide to do a loop. Bang! The pattern seems to be a help in knowing what you are going to do next. Now I'm still a sport flyer and can't do all of the stunts yet but I now talk myself through what I'm going to do - Helps a lot.

Just my 2 cents worth

Cary

Mel Duval · Jan 18, 2001 08:30 PM

#20 source
As a sport flyer still working on the Pattern a little at a time (I'm up to reverse wingovers and square loops), I agree completely with Cary. My last big crash and a couple of my flying buddies' crashes have all come from indecision or changing your mind too late on what to do next. I have also had a number of minor ones running out of fuel on the back side of an eight or inverted by losing track of run time. I can see how doing the Pattern every time would solve both of these.
And also something Len told me a long time ago, that I have unfortunately proved true a couple of times. If it is not running right FLY STRAIGHT AND LEVEL!!! DON'T try to stunt it!! I have told this to my latest student and hope he listens better than I did.
THANKS LEN!!

Mel Duval

Mark Knott · Jan 18, 2001 05:16 PM

#19 source
The only reason I crash is because I don't know "beans" about flying control line. There is not anyone in my area to get advice or learn from, so my grandsons and I are learning "on the job" from the ground up (and right back down). I can say that this has been more fun for us than anything that I have done in years. We really enjoy our few minutes of flight time and I really like building models, so I guess everything balances out!
I do learn much from reading message boards such as this one.

Thanks

Scott Riese · Jan 18, 2001 10:27 PM

#21 source
I can't find CRASH in my vocabulary Scott

Randy · Jan 20, 2001 04:24 PM

#26 source
Scott,

>>I can't find CRASH in my vocabulary Scott <<

Well, now you've done it. You've invoked the Wrath of the Gods.

Randy

Jim P · Jan 18, 2001 11:43 PM

#22 source
After returning to CL flying after a 25 year hiatus, I built a decent Banshee and went flying. All went OK but I couldn't get the bottoms of my maneuvers down on even the loops, inverted flight, etc. and didn't attempt hourglass, etc. Anyway, with perfect conditions, perfect run and perfect trim, I decided it was time to get down. On the back half of the reverse wingover I gritted my teeth and waited and waited and waited until the nose was buried about 6 inches deep and Banshee was totaled-reflexes ain't what they used to be. Since then, I've kept it higher and will worry about getting down when I get everything else worked out.

57carnut · Jan 19, 2001 12:02 AM

#23 source
I thought I was the only one! Now I know there are at least a few stubborn guys out there, like me. The last Three (3) planes I lost were all due to trying to do something with an obviously bad engine run. (going back 6 or 8 years on two planes and last year on one) I dont know if I am just impatient or bull-headed. (my wife can answer that) Hopefully, I have learned my lesson about engine runs. One other crash about 4 yrs ago was on grass, so there was only minor damage. This was due to losing concentration and/or looking away on the overhead eights, and losing the location of the plane. Also saw an experienced flyer lose a really nice classic a few yrs ago when he changed his mind on whether to do an inverted or upright wingover on the pullout. Lesson learned.

VolvoBird · Jan 22, 2001 08:41 PM

#27 source
Several years ago I was fortunate enough to talk with George Aldrich about my coming back to flying C/L stunt. His advice for learning and/or relearning was to develop a definite plan for each flight and to stick with that plan. Unfortunately, I have had little time in the air since then - - a situation that will be radically changed come spring - - but his advice has served me well so far. Just as the pattern lets the experienced pilot know what is coming next, following a well though out learning/flight plan can almost eliminate the learner's indecision about what to do next.

DJMalott · Jan 22, 2001 08:57 PM

#28 source
Most of the crashes since I first flew a CL plane have been caused by changing my mind in the middle of a maneuver. Gusty wind has caused a few, and leadout or line breaks have been responsible for two that I remember, but most...decisions made at the worst time.

Denny Malott

Jim P · Jan 23, 2001 01:01 AM

#29 source
Did one today that's worth mentioning. Bottom line is I hit the only tree on the field. It's a poor site, a very tight softball field. At the time I stepped it off I was flying 60', but today was flying 63', that plus a slight shift of pilot position due to mud and backing up to recover slack lines on take off all of the while totally forgetting about the tree put me about 8 inches too close to tree. Damage to brand new ship is ugly but repairable. I am getting my chain saw sharpened, however so if you see a demonstration by tree huggers on Oprah about someone cutting down a beautiful tree in the middle of the night please don't rat me out.

LNeumann · Jan 23, 2001 09:38 AM

#30 source
Those trees have a nasty habit of jumping out at us if we get close. Trees, fence posts, power lines--especially the latter--are good to avoid. I remember Jimmy Casale (Nats Champion) hit a fence post with his plane while practicing. In fact, as I remember, he did it four times with four different planes, all in one year. It may have been an inviting place to fly...but...I think I might have reconsidered, about the third time. Maybe even the second.

When you get done cutting down the tree, you may be able to sell the engine to some 1/4 scale enthusiast.

Leonard Neumann