I'm not really sure I want to try making my own, I'm just interested in the process.
Randy
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 13 of 13 known posts recovered
I'm not really sure I want to try making my own, I'm just interested in the process.
Randy
And, no, I don't think you want to enter into that picture, unless you have a real good reason.
Leonard Neumann
You're right. I'm just interested in the process of how they are made. Not that I wouldn't mind tackling it, but I don't think the tooling needed is worth the effort to make pipes for myself and I'm not interested in going into business <grin>.
Who knows, I might decide to make my own. I doubt it, but I wanted to know how it was done.
If you use a turned mandrel, how do you get it out after cure? Is it made of foam or other "melt-able" material?
Randy
Not as easy as it looks!
See Ya
peabody
The ones I've seen show one obvious external seam where the forward end joins the rearward piece, which are designed to land this seam on the point of maximum diameter. George had a box of these to unpack in his shop while I was there on two separate occasions. He sells them for the GMA/Jett stunt engines.
Kiwi
.
There are baffles in the typical pipe. Also, some of the newer ones have the eshaust outlet aimed down--in effect another chamber. All of which adds up to...that's why we let the other guy do it, unless we have a special need for a special pipe and know what we are doing (or are willing to spend the time and money learning).
Leonard Neumann
Seems the best route is to make the pipe in 2 pieces. This would allow you to insert a baffle and would make molding a bit easier. I have an early Smith pipe that was obviously made in 2 halves and joined right down the middle, front to rear. Another is pretty clearly also made in 2 pieces but as a front half and and back half. Another, more recent one, I can't figure out how it was made. Seems to be one piece.
Randy