Design Dude,
Tanks for the ARF Flite Streaks look to be a minor problem. Just as they were when this design was first kitted. This last weekend I tried one of those old Veco "profile" tanks, a 3.5-ounce number shortened about .250 and plumbed for uni-flo. While I did fly with this tank, what I really did was to prove they didn't work well back then. And they still don't.
A friend was using a rather square and boxy Brodak tank of some sort. Standard venting. We think his main problem is a low-time Magnum 25, so no claims are made as to whether this tank works or not.
However, I think the answer to this problem is pretty simple: Mount whatever tank you want on the inboard side of the fuselage. Lots more room to work with.
While I think there is (barely) enough room for a cheapie Sullivan SS-4 tank or maybe the RST-4, I discovered a spare 3-ounce Tettra tank in my growing supply of four-stroke junk. Fits perfectly. I am expecting superb runs.
As you have have more than a passing knowledge of relaxed-bladder in a hard shell types of tanks, thought I would remind you of this option.
When we were using this sort of setup in Slow Combat (reference: Cheater Slow) the only problem we had was setting the motor off lean enough; our tanks being positioned inboard of the engine tended to cause the engine to go a little rich in flight. This seems to be a good deal for Stunt as one simply cannot set the motor so lean it cooks itself in the air. At least that's my guess...
And don't be telling me about your home-brew relaxed-bladder tanks. Mine cost about 25% of what the entire ARF cost. And I'm proud of that. As I am the Central Hobbies CF pushrod.