>I am not advocating any change to the current Classic rules.
> But why not run a contest with an adjusted cutoff date for
>Classic designs? This has been discussed in another thread
>several months ago. A logical alternative to conduct such a
>contest would be to run a "Modified Classic Event" that
>essentially separates the "Standard Classic" and the
>"Revised Classic" models as two categories within the event.
> Fly all the entries on one circle, using the same judges
>and using a flight rotation that combines both categories,
>but separate the scores for the two categories on the score
>board. This would not be hard to do and takes no additional
>resources other than the additional flights in the Classic
>event. It does mean there would need to be two sets of
>awards.
>
>Might come up with some interesting results.
>
>If there is a continued and growing interest in such an
>event, various alternatives could be considered in the
>future for rules additions or changes.
Hey I know !....Lets call it "Classic Larger Sans Drag Plus Foam" with the same ol wimpy motor....and when that becomes a loaf over the top call it " We Found a better Motor provided you can Build a 630 at 50 OZ. or Less with no real shape/appeal to speak of"!
Better yet...twenty years on "Over powered Box Fly trapezoids on oblong rectangles with foam if you want or lost/the same old thing with a different name are us .com"