Mounting plastic tanks on profiles
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 11 of 11 known posts recovered
I've seen them mounted with a wide aluminum strap with a little cut out for the locator bump.
Giffy
------------------------------
I Fly
Iskandar Taib · Oct 14, 2003 11:30 PM
#4 sourceWorks OK for 1/2-As and Slow Combat.. (the tanks didn't work that great in Slow, but the filling technique worked OK).
Richard_Spurling · Oct 14, 2003 11:18 PM
#3 sourceHaving said that, a mate did something similar at about the same time and had no end of trouble. Mind you, he was going through a period where nothing worked for him.
I did a similar thing with the kid's trainers and had no problems but in that case, the tanks only stayed on for a few weekends - the tiny clunk tanks proved to be a failure so I cut them off and replaced them with tin tanks that were recessed into the fuselage. However, the tanks were well stuck in place so I would have anticipated them lasting as well ... if only they'd worked.
Cheers
Richard
Bill Little · Oct 15, 2003 07:40 AM
#6 sourceI use "almost" the same set up. Let me see if I can describe the difference.

Instead of the hardwood strip for the eyelets, I bend two "c" shaped pieces of 1/16 music wire which are inserted through the plywood plate from the back. The "c" is just wide enough to clear the height of the tank. Once in place, I bend a hook on each end to capture the rubber bands. I think it is just a touch lighter.
Bill
Dont worry about the mule going blind 'til you get the cart loaded!
Small cup hooks or J-bolts (4) with rubber bands if you arent going to a concours. We put two CF rods in to support shims under the tank for height stability. You can also split CF arrow shafts for this. Light and very rigid.
The twisting of the uniflow tube for height adjustment also works.
The down sides, in my opinion are: Weight close to metal. Lots of joints to leak and fail. Clunk can get trapped/twisted. And finally, for the capacity, they need alot of room fore and aft. The ability with a metal tank to exit the feed and vents along the sides of the tank instead of the end allows alot more mounting freedom on smaller planes.
recent weight analysis on a friends 7 oz PA tank---plastic saved .2oz!
On a 65+ oz plane! THe question with these is also, not if they will ever leak, but when they will leak.
Not a real fan --- but for quick and dirty they're ok.
FWIW
Curt
Ion Brazil · Oct 15, 2003 12:50 PM
#8 source
I love'em! Maae tem uniflow and use muffler presssure.
When I used Foxes the "burp" went away...
God bless you!
In Christ,
Ion
Iskandar Taib · Oct 16, 2003 03:53 AM
#9 sourceLots of food for thought here. I'll be trying out several things.
I've used a number of clunk tanks in r/c and c/l models and the quality, even among the same supplier, is variable. Mind you, I'm fussy. I'd complain about things (like leaks, lousy pipes, lousy tubing) that'd have my r/c buddies (hey, a yankie term from an aussie) scratching their heads. Perhaps we ask too much in control line. Perhaps it's too late at night for me to be making this post. Perhaps I need another red wine.
Note that I'm grumpy about the quality of the tanks, not clunk tanks themselves. I've used them a lot in stunt. I prefer tin but clunk has its place. Strangely, with some tanks (even sullivan and dubro), there's not time saving either - a tin tank doesn't take all that long to make. Even less if Mr Brodak does it for you.
Cheers
Richard