>>Your 15 FP may be a bit much for a Streak Trainer (baffle
>>style 15s often end up on this model). On the other hander,
>>plenty of power can be used to your advantage on a trainer.
>>You can control speed with pitch.
>>
>My 11 year old flies a Streak Trainer with FP 15 and has no
>problems on 52' .012 lines and an 8x4 MA prop. Note the
>Brodak plans show an FP 20! Even with the FP 15 it comes
>out a little nose heavy.
>
>I had equally good success with the Fox baffle .19s years
>ago on this particular trainer.
When my sons were pre-adolescents, we put Fox 19's on TF Streak Trainers, and used 9-4 props. Balanced just right with those, didn't fly too fast on 52' lines - excellent matchup. Then, a few years later, when my daughter was the age they had been, those two Fox 19's had gone into the parts bins, so we used the pre-FP OS 20 that some folks refer to as a "Max-S". Still an excellent match, so I would have to say that an FP 15 or LA 15, either one, should work out just fine!
Actually, I would have thought that using a typical baffle 15 from the 1950's and 1960's on this model would've required a big nose weight (it really IS intended to be built nose-heavy). But it does have a VERY long tail, folks! The FP 15 would come a lot closer to balancing the plane correctly than a 1967 model baffle glow 15, any brand at all, although it's not close to being as heavy as either of the 19 / 20 engines that I have used.
.
Kiwi