>He had balanced the plane according to plans with
>approximately two
>ounces of tail weight...Perhaps there is no correction from
>the manufacture indicating where the balance point really
>should be.
FYI-the December 2003 Flying Models has a review. Regarding the CG issue, it states:
"A CG Location of 3 1/4" behind the leading edge of the wing is recommended and the instructions note that the prototype required an ounce of weight in the tail; similarly, an ounce was used to bring this model nearly that far back. As the model was being flown, though, every flyer that tried the Flite Streak preferred a further forward CG, and we ended up with no tail weight and a CG about two inches behind the leading edge. So don't be afraid to make your first flights with the CG this far forward."
Comment: Strikes me as soft pedaling a near-disaster, IMHO.
Other quotes:
"After a couple of landings, though, the (single) landing gear wire had twisted inside the fuselage; this was fixed by drilling out the hole, inserting a brass eyelet (Sig SH-215), and epoxying the both the eyelet and wire in the fuselage."
Comment: DUH!!!
"The engine mounting wood is plywood rather than hardwood and will crush if you crank on the supplied 4-40 mounting screws. However the .25 LA-S engine was so smooth that no problems have been noted."
"The small metal tank that is supplied (holding about 2 ounces) permits only about a 3-minute flight. This is ideal for new flyers!"
Comment: I get it, it's a *feature*, not a bug! The glass..err-uhh TANK is half *full*.
"The fixed leadouts have held up well."
This is not exactly an insightful, hard-hitting piece of journalism. But if you read between the lines, it does tell you what you need to know to set up a better-than-average ARF Flite Streak.