Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Johnson 35 information needed

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 47 of 47 known posts recovered

Dave Simons · Nov 06, 2003 01:13 AM

#0 source
OK Guys, I need help!

I have never owned any Johnson engine - only ever seen a couple - and I like to power my Classic ships with period/classic engines. Ok, for competition I'll use a current engine, but I Like the old ones too.

I have to run mufflers, so power will be affected. However I am a light builder (x-ff)and I was thinking of a smallish model - an Ares say, although other suggestions are welcome.

My questions: What model Johnson is regarded as best for a classic setup? Comparisons with other period motors Fox,OS etc?

What to look for in a used example, anything out of the ordinary?

Setup and running tips?

Sources? prices? offers?

I hope this turns out to be non-controversial!

Thanks in advance,
Dave

elmores · Nov 06, 2003 02:20 AM

#1 source
I have a 29 (£40) and 2*35's (£25 a piece and tatty) they are all what I think are called the 'small case' model.

They are difficult to silence as they have slanting exhaust stacks - however my K&B Greenhead tongue muffler fits snugly and may be usable - it would be ace if someone with a workshop out there could produce an adaptor!

I saw an odd looking motor recently it was called a Johnson 34 and had an Orwick? head on it - the guy wanted £90 for it!

Tony

elmores · Nov 15, 2003 05:14 AM

#35 source
Here are pics of my 3!

elmores · Nov 15, 2003 12:41 PM

#36 source
And one with a tongue muffler fitted:

ucflier · Nov 06, 2003 05:49 AM

#2 source
Dave:

The best Johnson for the classic 4/2 run is the "S" motor. It was a combination of .29 and .35 parts that Hi concocted to make a motor of approximately .33 displacement with mild timing and low compression; they are marked with a simple stamped or cast "S" on the bypass. Should have about the equivalent of Fox .35 power, maybe a bit more. Ted Fancher flew these back in the late 50's as I recall. I think that Hi first built one of these for George Aldrich in the hangar at one of the Navy nats (57 or 58??).

The other Johnson "stunt" engine is the "SS" (Stunt Supreme). This engine does not 4/2 well, as it has more aggressive timing. It is also built on the later "large case" platform and thus weighs more than the small case "S" noted above. The power is not much different. Ted once suggested that the Jetco Sabre Stunt might be a good model for this engine because the shorter nose moment would help compensate for the added weight. I have a kit, and hope to build one for one of my SS engines.

Values, as you know, are highly subjective. I have picked up a couple of "S" engines that needed some TLC on eBay in the mid $60 range - however, expect a nice one to be over $100. Seems about the same in the MECA Swap Sheet. I think you will find the "S" to be the hardest to find, and the straight .35 will be fairly common. The "SS" variants, while not common, will be more plentiful than the "S".

Mufflers and Johnsons are not particulary friendly, because many of the Johnsons used sub-port induction. As noted above, the small case engines had a slanted exhaust stack, so a standard strap-on will rest at an odd angle. Leonard may be able to come up with a workable design for you.

Like most old engines of the day, they need a strong dose of castor. Look for evidence that they have been run with R/C fuel - low compression, rod slop. Parts are nearly non-existent, so any restoration needed to internals will have to be accomplished by the advanced chrome-and-machining type guys like Oge or Blackburn.

Randy Linsalato of RJL/MECOA owns the rights and remaining tooling for the Johnson brand. We have been trying for a number of years to get him to repro the "S", but no success. I am working with Frank Bowman right now to get some "S" rods fabricated with bushings (the same rod is used in the straight .35 small case) but it is looking a little expensive at this point.

Hope this info is helpful!

Currell · Nov 06, 2003 07:59 AM

#3 source

UCflyer has it right. I have about a dozen Johnsons, and have used a number of them on sport models. The "S" indeed is the one to get. Its characteristics are very Fox-like (read: they 4-2-4 well);however, you also get the Dreaded Fox Burp on outside maneuvers at no extra charge, at least on a profile. This is a small case engine, so there are some weight savings vs the later, large case Johnsons. They some with either an embossed (cast in) and enscribed (scratched in, sort of) "S" on the case, and probably some without any designation at all, knowing Johnson.

Here's a surprisingly adept CL Johnson no one talks about...the (large case) Sport Special. The cooling fins do not taper, and their tips are kind of rounded off. This has a plain bearing. I currently am running one on a A J Firecat. I also have a "S" on a Super Ringmaster. Even with a 10-5 and in a 4-2-4 mode, it is too fast! Also, I have run a small case .29 and .35 on a Shoestring. They run sort of in between a K & B Greenhead, which likes a wet 2, and their Fox like S cousins. Yes, I would say that the S may have a bit more power than a Fox, sort of like some McCoy Redheads, but less than an OS 35-S.

I have a bunch of J's that need models, still, like a couple of small case .32s with 4 bolt heads.

Generally, you can get Johnsons to run pretty much in a sport/stunt manner by playing with head gaskets and venturi inserts, similar to other motor brands. If you need a muffler, a tonque is the way to go, although it may become something of a design challenge fitting one to a small case, since the exhaust stack is slanted significantly.

There is, almost always, at least one or two Johnsons on ebay, so keep an eye out for them.

The truly collectible (and virtually unobtainable) J's are the early ones still in their semi-opaque green crankcase paint!

Currell

Currell · Nov 06, 2003 08:01 AM

#4 source
Tony: Orwick is of course the predecessor for Johnson. Never heard of a .34, though. Currell

tom hampshire · Nov 06, 2003 09:05 AM

#5 source
Caution - Any 4 bolt head Johnson probably has the first version crank and they break through the web. I'm told that the factory had a trash can full of these blowup victims. So unless you are sure the engine was built from parts with the later version small case crnakshaft, any 4 bolt is best left on the shelf. Tom Hampshire

shholt · Nov 06, 2003 10:09 AM

#6 source
One other thing I remember from running Johnsons a lot, was that they did not like much nitro. While a Fox runs really well with 15% nitro, I'd suggest that for the Johnsons you keep it below 10%. I have a couple of SS's, a ball bearing Combat 36, and a small case 35. I plan to use 7% nitro, 28% castor on all them when I run them.
Steve

The older I get, the better I used to fly!

Currell · Nov 06, 2003 10:22 AM

#7 source
Tom: I don't know if this is a valid general statement, since J. compression ratios and timing vary a lot, across the various motors.

I would think that the CSs would work OK with 15% nitro, for example.

And, it has been my experience that low compression engines, like the Fox Stunt and Johnson S, also respond to 15% well.

Currell

Andy · Nov 06, 2003 11:34 AM

#11 source
As far as I'm concerned, there's no question the small case .33S is the best stunt engine Johnson put out. It ranks right up there with the best small frame .35's of the period. I've run several and still use a couple. All have been very fine performers. No experience with mufflers on these. I can't find much good to say for the large case .35SS. I know some folks like these but for me they are just heavy weight gas guzzlers. Andy

ucflier · Nov 06, 2003 10:29 AM

#8 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-06-03 AT 10:29 AM (CST)
 
Tom:

I heard from one engine man that Johnson pistons also had a tendency to break between the domed head and the skirt. One theory was (as noted above) that low nitro fuel was required. I have never actually seen this occur, however.

T.Durrill · Nov 06, 2003 10:59 AM

RE: Johnson 35 information (loving care needed)#10 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-06-03 AT 09:58 PM (CST)
 
In the 1960's, my brother-in-law and I used to run Johnson .36BB's on pacifiers and Missile Mist fuel (25% nitro/17-20% castor). This was a big NO NO. They ran like a bat out of hell, however, the story about pistons breaking between the dome and the skirt are quite true. We saw this happen first hand. I would recommend you never run more than 15% nitro in Johnsons, with 5%-10% nitro being about right. Use all castor lube and no less than 25%. Got to take care of those old Johnsons because parts are next to impossible to find. I still have a Johnson .36BB (broken piston) that we blew up in 1966 and have never been able to get it repaired due to lack of parts. I also have a Johnson Combat Special .35 and a Johnson .36RC converted to C/L. They are both in running condition and I plan to be careful about the fuel that goes through them...........TD

Howard Rush · Nov 06, 2003 01:41 PM

RE: Johnson 35 information (loving care needed)#14 source
Amen on the fuel: 5% nitro is plenty. I'd go with 29% oil, too. I've had the pistons disintegrate, too. They were powdered metal, as I remember.

Big-case Johnsons take big props. We used 9-8s for combat.

cyberflyer · Nov 06, 2003 10:59 AM

#9 source
>Dave:
>
>The best Johnson for the classic 4/2 run is the "S" motor.
>It was a combination of .29 and .35 parts that Hi concocted
>to make a motor of approximately .33 displacement with mild
>timing and low compression; they are marked with a simple
>stamped or cast "S" on the bypass. Should have about the
>equivalent of Fox .35 power, maybe a bit more. Ted Fancher
>flew these back in the late 50's as I recall. I think that
>Hi first built one of these for George Aldrich in the hangar
>at one of the Navy nats (57 or 58??).

George Aldrich said that the timing modification to the Stunt Supreme to give it the same characteristics as the .33 S was trivial. My word, not his. The idea I got was that anyone who examined an S version closely could figure out what the timing change had to be on SS and that it was a minor mod to change.

He said it would be easy to modify the SS to a 4/2 run and i had a number of .35 SS engines in his shop when he passed away. I've got one of the ,33 S versions and am looking for an engine man who can deduce from the S version what to do to an SS to get it to 4/2 properly.

And yes, they are a little heavy. But I've heard a lot of good things about power and strength. I figure an SS that will 4/2 would be a great vintage stunt engine.

I'd put one in my Hi Johnson designed Panther, an eliptical winged job with a short nose. And I think they would look good in any old Veco design.

Clair Sieverling designed a lovely airframe called the Phoenician which utilized his ideas about small flaps and what not. It's an attractive design and the plans show a Johnson Stunt Supreme as the engine of choice. I wonder why, because it has a long nose and the SS is a heavy engine.

Plans for it are available from our forum host.

http://www.clstunt.com/plans.htm

Cy

The Cat Whisperer

Norm · Nov 06, 2003 12:47 PM

#12 source
I loved Johnsons. They always outperformed Foxes...in my opinion. The 17,000RPM in contrast to the Fox 14,000 (approx) was what I was looking for..that way I could outdo my older brother.
I still fly a couple on Flight Streaks but here is what I do with the rest of them.

Currell · Nov 06, 2003 01:09 PM

#13 source
Nice.

I'm looking at the venturi on the top row, far right...

Re AJ Interceptors...sand the daylights out of them (get all the lines off), and they will OOS in thermals.

Currell

Norm · Nov 06, 2003 02:25 PM

#15 source
The venturi on that engine has been shaved at a considerably steeper angle so that more air can get forced through...I'm guessing. This is an engine I picked up...mods were not done by me. I don't think I'll try it out to see how it performs.
A couple of these engines were Combat Specials that a friend of mine and I picked up some years ago in a hobby store. They were brand new in boxes with plastic lids and had the original price on them so we paid $24.95 Canadian for each one.
I remember when I first ran one it sucked up the fuel like mad. Runs went from 4 minutes to under 3 with the same tank.

Dave Simons · Nov 06, 2003 06:14 PM

#16 source
Hi Guys, Many thanks to all for your responses - what a goldmine of information!

So, it seems that I'm looking for a small case 'S' version, to run 2-4-2 in a classic ship. I figured on a high castor content anyway, at least 25% for a steel engine - the lower nitro content is good advice.

I make my own tongue mufflers, so I should be able to cobble something up that wont choke it to death, seems that the Johnson is not much different to some other older motors in this respect.

Didn't know about the sintered piston though - piston & rod shouldn't be a huge problem, there are a couple of guys here that do a great job of this kind of work. So long as the castings, sleeve & shaft are good, all should be well. I'd prefer an original engine though, of course.

I Always liked the designs of Claire Sieverling & the phoenician is the prettiest - think a friend built one in the '60s.

Well much as I loathe ebay, better start looking - unless someone here has an engine surplus to requirements - I'd kinda like to deal with a SSW guy - keeps it in the family, I guess.

Sincere thanks, guys
Dave Simons

Charlie Pate · Nov 06, 2003 07:02 PM

#17 source
Johnsons had a very hard cylinder .Twas said to be equiv.to rockwell
60 in hardness.
I had some that were so so, and a couple of really good ones.
Mine just loved 75% k&b100 and 25% green label powermist
Ted Fancher had one in a chief at vsc one year and it just flew great.
Best I can tell , the Mc coy 36 was very similar to the 35.
I believe , like Mccoy , Johnsons downfall was consistancy or quality control.
You should hear the tale about the 29 BULLDOG prototype they flew in speed at the nats. I woulr tell you, but it just takes too long to do with two fingers.

Jake · Nov 06, 2003 10:15 PM

#18 source
Johnson pistons came from the same supplier who made them for Testors for the McCoy redhead series.
Main thing that did Johnson in was when Hi dived off headfirst into the slotcar boom of the early '60s and then lost everything when it went bust.
I currently have a couple Johnsons; one .33S and a small case .35.

J

"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".

Allen Goff · Nov 10, 2003 04:34 PM

#19 source
Dave;

A good person to ask about Johnson engines might be Roger Wildman. Roger worked for H. Johnson and probably handeled most every engine they produced. Roger now lives in Indy, he is listed in the PAMPA directory.

Blessings
Allen

Allen Goff

Dave Simons · Nov 10, 2003 11:54 PM

#20 source
Alan,
Many thanks for the tip, Kiwi also thanks for the contact,
Much appreciated!
Cheers, Dave Simons

Jim Sofra · Nov 11, 2003 12:19 AM

#21 source
Hi Dave. I've got a bag of johnson parts. If you're interested I'll dig em out and chat with you. I 've got a green case orwick that was one of the first non ignition orwicks. it still has the machined nose of the ignition models. It's a 29 and has a beautiful green finish. you can see the progression in design towards the early johnsons.Best, JS

Steve Lotz · Nov 11, 2003 06:28 AM

#22 source
A nice muffler is the old Tatone Peace Pipe in the 29-40 size. The angle on the pipe is perfect for a slant stack Johnson as the exit chamber ends up pretty much horizontal.

Steve

hothandle · Nov 11, 2003 08:01 AM

#23 source

As was pointed out parts are scarce. I have a small case 35 with a badly pitted wristpin, and a very loose rod to wristpin connection.
Does anyone have a good wristpin and rod for a small case 35? I could also use a wristpin for a large case CS as well.
Hothandle

Hothandle

Dave Simons · Nov 11, 2003 10:48 PM

#24 source
OK,
one for the Johnson gurus here - I've been offered an engine complete, apparently running condition, haven't seen it yet, but here is the description:
6 bolt head, 3 bolt backplate, venturi insert, "Johnson" on bypass, small raised circle under exhaust, die cast prop driver. Engine originally came from Dave Mayer in the US. Allegedly 58-60 vintage.

The vendor is a flying buddy of mine - I didn't even know he had a J35.

What is it? is it worth purchasing for what I want - 4-2-4 in a smallish classic? Bear In mind I am definately not an engine collector, I have a model planned for every engine that I'll build some day (yeah sure!).

Thanks again everyone,
Cheers, Dave

ucflier · Nov 12, 2003 05:04 AM

#25 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-03 AT 05:06 AM (CST)
 
Dave:

What is in the small raised circle under the exhaust? If it is "S" the engine is the desirable Stunt mentioned above. If it is "SS" then it is the large case Stunt Supreme; if CS the Combat Special; if "35" it is the straight 35; and if there is no inscription it will likely be the Sport Special that Currell was discussing above. The small case engines will have mounting lugs that meet the front of the case on a perpindicular. The large case have a lug extension in the front that carries out farther onto the crankcase "nose." All of these factors, plus the motor's condition, will affect value. I think any Johnson that is complete and in good running condition is worth at least $50 (personal opinion backed by observation). If you can tell us more about the engine we can probably get the value closer.

Currell · Nov 12, 2003 08:22 AM

#26 source
Agree with UCflyer. In fact, the $50 could be a little conservative.

The most desirable Johnson, for our purposes, is the S. This one appparently is that that, but standard small case 35s, and the various large case, non combat models all can work out well.

Did the guy give you a price? Is this Dave you mentioned the same Dave Mayer that lives either in Minnesota or Wisconsin? I know him (good guy) from the Winter Swap Curcuit, and have bought an engine or two from him. Currell

Dave Simons · Nov 12, 2003 07:00 PM

#27 source
Hi Currell,
It appears (wish I had a photo) to be a later large case stunt - no marking in the circle under the exhaust & lugs that extend onto the nose of the c/case. While I would prefer a 4-2-4 style, I can live with a wet 2 cycle - that was how I ran various OS max & enya engines in the '60s - used to swap engines from stunt to combat regularly.

Yes, the engine was sold to my buddy (Tom Thompson) by Dave Mayer in Wisconsin, Tom said that Dave was really great to deal with & utterly reliable.

No discussion of price - its a sellers market & price will be higher here than in the US. Tom also has a totally original, low mileage Ford Falcon GTHO, '74, the kind that won all the long distance production races here in the '70s - maybe I could do a package deal!

Cheers, Dave

Jim T. · Nov 12, 2003 08:53 PM

#28 source
Jack Garcia has just started posting on the CL forum at RC Universe.

cyberflyer · Nov 13, 2003 02:51 AM

#29 source
>Jack Garcia has just started posting on the CL forum at RC
>Universe.

So why not paste a link to it here?

The Cat Whisperer

elmores · Nov 13, 2003 03:40 AM

#30 source
Probably everone else knows but who is Jack Garcia and what does he have to do with Johnsons?

elmores · Nov 13, 2003 05:36 AM

#31 source
Alright I've been there and seen for myself - boy are there some scary airheads there!

Tony

crash2much · Nov 14, 2003 02:24 PM

#32 source
Looking for a good cylinder and piston set for a SS 35 if you have one? Thanks, Bill

ucflier · Nov 14, 2003 10:21 PM

#33 source
This has been a great Johnson engine discussion. I hope to hook up with Mr. Garcia from the other forum and get some more insight into the production operations. Thought I would post some pictures of what has been talked about here.

The NIB .35 Green Case is rare, the first production after Hi purchased the line from Orwick. You can see the lacquer flaking from the sharp edges just from box wear – imagine what happened when it was actually used!

The .32 4 bolt cylinder head would have been the next series after the green case models. Small case engines available as .29, .32, and .35 displacements.

The .29 and .32 small case engines represent the most common form of the small case series, 6 bolt heads, available as .29, .32, .33 (S), and .35 displacements. Note the displacements cast into the bypass during case manufacture.

The “S” (Stunt) is the sought after variation made by combining .29 and .35 parts to make delightful 4/2 stunt engine. Note the two examples – one has the “S” stamped into the by-pass, the other has it cast in. My theory is that Hi hand-built this variation for some greats like George Aldrich, and it worked well, so he milled the displacement markings from existing cases and stamped the “S” for early production engines. Later, cases with cast-in “S” were procured. Most of my “S” engines are stamped, not cast – perhaps there were fewer built with purpose built cases??

Moving to the large case engines, we have a NIB 29R (racing). Either not many of these have survived, or perhaps not many were made. Would love to have production records on the Johnson models!!

Next is the famed Combat Special (CS). Note the provision of both a pressure nipple and screw for plugging the backplate. I don’t know if I have ever seen a CS or an SS (Stunt Supreme) with cast-in model designations. I believe the large case engines were all built on the same case, and perhaps Hi just had the cases mass-produced without markings.

Following is the Stunt Supreme (SS). Not near the 4/2 engine as the “S”, and heavier. More plentiful on the market than the “S”.

Next is a large case 35S. I thought this might have been somebody’s concoction, but Ted Fancher told me he was pretty sure this was offered for a short time. Not the sweet 4/2 motor that the “S” was. This is the only one I have ever seen.

The NIB J/RC has the famed AM1 carburetor, quite the innovation for R/C in its day. Also note the way the venturi boss and front of the exhaust stack was milled to accept the carburetor. The R/C was shipped with the pressure nipple provision, same as the CS. The J/RC and the J/BB were the only models with ball bearings. Notice the quality of the stamping for the model designation has improved considerably – new dies??

The J/BB was the control line version of the J/RC. These seem to be fairly scarce in the market, and I believe they were produced near the end of the model airplane product years (just prior to slot cars).

The Sport Special was the last new model produced, I believe. It was an attempt to compete with the low price sport engines in the market, but was more expensive. Note that lack of any model designation on the bypass and the venturi that was short and flat – in other words, a J/RC case converted back to C/L. I have heard there are a few Sport Specials built on J/BB cases (venturi and exhaust stack not milled). Supposedly these are very scarce.

Finally, a close-up of the early NVA with the knurled knob on the end. All Johnson NVA’s are scarce – these early ones are just about non-existent. It seems the later barrel-knobbed NVA’s were used on both small case and large case engines – not sure when the cut-over was made. However, the later NVA style was sold as replacement parts for the early engines and many were replaced in the field. And, a shot of the Johnson docs offering “hop up” service for your engine. Leonard, looks like you need to lower your prices some to compete!!

Currell · Nov 14, 2003 11:16 PM

#34 source
Great pictures! I guess I am lucky that many of my J's have original nvas.

And, again, I do like the Sport Special. It is on a Firecat right now.

Currell

74seven7 · Nov 15, 2003 07:50 PM

#37 source
I was very interested to read the above information on Johnsons by
ucflier,so dug out my Stunt Supreme which is un-run & mint. Mine has
the SS cast into the case,not stamped - it has a red (anodised alloy)
venturi insert,and the short fat needle valve. Another small detail
mine has (which I've noticed on other Johnsons on e**y)is the extreme
front and back head screws are black,while the other 4 are shiny. I
seem to recall also,back in the 60's reading Johnson advertisements
that said that the piston crown was coated with some special stuff
that burnt when you first started the engine,thus sealing the porous
(sintered or powdered metal)top of the piston. Also remember reading
that even back then the SS was regarded as a bit too much of a power
house,and an 11x5 prop. was recommended to tame it a little.

ucflier · Nov 15, 2003 08:27 PM

#38 source
Bob:

Thanks for confirming the case with the cast-in SS. I was pretty sure I had seen one, thought I had one, but then discovered that all mine were stamped - which made me wonder if I really did ever see one. I do have a couple with the red anodized insert and the rest with plain aluminum.

Regards.

Currell · Nov 16, 2003 10:57 AM

#39 source
Bob: My Johnson Large Case SS is exactly like yours, red insert, etched (not cast) "SS", and, most importantly, black head screws front and rear, with the other 4 natural color. I had never noticed this last detail.

Currell

Steve Lotz · Nov 16, 2003 11:19 AM

#40 source
There's a method to that madness...the fore and aft bolts are minutely longer than the others and need to be in their proper place when reassembling the engine.

Steve

jobellcrank · Nov 16, 2003 12:09 PM

#41 source
Well, apparently, my treasured J is the small case .35 from reading this discussion. Sure wish it was the S. But it seems some of you report that a decent stunt run can be had with this engine. Or did I read that wrong?

I'm wondering why everything is spinning around?

John Miller

ucflier · Nov 16, 2003 12:20 PM

#42 source
John:

The straight .35's were more of a wet 2 cycle engine versus a 4/2 run. I would think a set up like a modern OS using a lower pitch and higher RPM run would work fine.

Regards,
Bruce

jobellcrank · Nov 16, 2003 12:55 PM

#43 source
Thanks I'll try that.

I'm wondering why everything is spinning around?

John Miller

Currell · Nov 16, 2003 01:06 PM

#44 source
UCflier is correct. The J. .35 is somewhat similar to a K & B Greenhead in this regard, but not quite. You can play with head gaskets and restrictions to change the run characteristics, to a degree. Currell

Dave Simons · Nov 18, 2003 11:37 PM

#45 source
Just collected my Johnson, I think it is a sport special. Cant post a picture at the moment 'cause my digital camera just packed up.

Herewith a description: Large case, natural venturi insert (quite small) original NVA, with the fibre sealing washers. The case has been machined on the venturi so that it makes an angle of about 10 degrees with the c/shaft axis. Also the front of the exhaust stack has been machined. I'm figuring this is for a r/c carby, whether original or optional.

The engine came with a Johnson instruction sheet that refers to the CS & SS as well as the 32 & race 29. I guess that the instruction sheet may be earlier than the engine. Kinda useful having the parts breakdown & bore/stroke for various models. The quoted weight of the SS is 7.6 oz. Another item of interest (?) is the same P/N is used for the venturi insert for the CS & SS, could that be why the SS has a reputation for not doing so well in 4-2-4 operation?

Question is - What have I bought? It's in good running shape, with excellent compression , paid US 60 bucks.

Thanks all,
Cheers, Dave

ucflier · Nov 19, 2003 07:34 AM

#46 source
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-03 AT 07:36 AM (CST)
 
Dave:

I would agree that you probably have the Sport Special. I understand that Hi ran the crank without a bronze bushing insert on these (to save manufacturing costs). If you tear it down and the crank is running on aluminum, it would be further confirmation of the type. You are right on the case machining also. As his glow engine business neared the end, Hi used one basic case of all engine models - and eventually it was machined to accept the AM-1 carb for the R/C engines, giving the C/L engines a rather crude appearance on the front end.

I would attribute the SS running characterisics more to the sleeve timing and compression than to the venturi size. I don't think the engine was designed to run in the 4/2 manner.

Based on your description, sounds like a solid deal! Currell really likes this engine and I am sure he will have good advice on set-up and running.