I will try and post some pics as I build the plane. AS they said in the movie Animal House "Oh Boy, is this great or what"
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 21 of 21 known posts recovered
I will try and post some pics as I build the plane. AS they said in the movie Animal House "Oh Boy, is this great or what"
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Might not be a bad idea to put this and future findings in the "Product Reviews" section.
Chris
So far the kit looks like it will be a good one to get my first experience with. I can only say nothing but good about it so far. I did post a note on the product review and will be updating it with pics and comments as I move along.
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
I'm sorry, I just saw it. This lazer cut stuff sounds too cool.
Chris
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
What engine are you going to use for power on this little bird? The only .15 size engines I have are 3 .15x's and 1 steenfin. Would these engines be sufficient power for Walter's Shark 15 kit?........TD
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Fred
I just looked at the rolled plans again after reading your post. Indeed the motor shown on the drawn plans is an OS 15. I don't believe it is a 15LA but an earlier model. Down in the corner of the plans it also recomends a 15 size motor. I'm not sure that a 19/25 would be needed as called for in the building instruction sheet. That may be something left over from the original kit, I don't know myself? I think I'll be sticking with the smaller motors for this one. When I get home I'm going to start on the kit.....I can't wait!!!!
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
I lost the airplane at a Treetown contest. Flight was going very well until I got disoriented in the overheads and put it in the asphalt. Several years ago, it placed second in Advanced at a St Louis contest where a couple of 60 ships got blown into the ground.
If the wood in your Umland kits for the Shark .15 is of the quality (read good, light wood) reported for his other kits, a modern Schneurle .15 will probably be too much engine. My three Shark .15's, all kit-built from the Jetco kits' wood were not overly heavy, but not overly light either. They all flew extremely well with loop scavenged, baffle Fox .15's. Both engines had more than enough power, even running in the 4-2-4 mode. If you have one of these, it should be the cat's meow for your new kits.
I even flew one of my Shark .15's with an Enya .09 that also had plenty of power to handle the plane.
I realize that "there is no substitute for cubes" (power, in this case), but the newer .15's tend to be quite a bit heavier than those engines for which the plane was designed, and as such, will most likely require tail weight, especially when a muffler is used (Remember, this plane was designed before mufflers were commonly used!), to get the CG into an acceptable range. This, of course, would increase the wing loading thereby degrading performance somewhat.
I wouldn't want to contradict the kit's manufacturer, but a .19 to .25, even of the older baffle type wpuld not, in my experience, be suitable engines for this plane either. Those engines were definitely not recommended by the designer or original kit manufacturer!
If I had to use a modern engine, I'd look at an .09 or a .10.
Just the 2ยข worth of some one else with Shark .15 experience.
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Ty, I feel like an idiot. I see on the full view/3d drawing that there are two different sets of tip " gussets " drawn. Very clear too I might add!!!
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com
Kirk Wicker
www.wingwalk.com