>SSWF is, like anything else, what you make of it.
>
>I prefer to think of it as a subject-dedicated user-built
>information resource. Every post is an addition to a web
>archive of knowledge intended to be viewed through a web
>browser window (as opposed to the pages of Stunt News).
>Which means we can include animations, sound, images and
>most powerful of all, links to our words.
Don't forget the "links" that are more in the realm of friendship, at the risk of transforming Len, Brett, Zilla, Dan, Larry C. and F. Currell, and all the gang into lifeless computer chips.
>Which is why taking the time to include a link to some other
>post you refer to rather than just mentioning it--and
>sending all future readers on a search--is a nice bit of
>information etiquette.
Cy, it deems that you are looking for a kind of efficiency we don't need, and at the price of a lot of good things that take place here.
>And why long personal exchanges, incomprehensible inside
>jokes and wildly off topic posts are nothing more than noise
>cluttering up the signal, IMHO.
Come on, Cy, I think the "signal" can take it...(IMHO)
>Every stunt (and to a degree C/L) question, every clear
>answer, every set of cropped and captioned pictures
>detailing a project or an event add to the value of the
>information repository. Each provide a slightly firmer
>foundation for others to build on. Each discussion a
>contribution to the information base that others can read at
>their interest and learn.
>
>The extent to which my notion of the SSWF is a user
>contributed knowledge base in which it is easy to find what
>you are looking for depends upon the thought process of each
>poster. Those who want to just 'chew the fat' are
>cluttering up the place with irrelevant palaver.
>
>IMHO
Cy, I'm not going to be the judge of what is irrelevant and who's words are so.
>The World Wide Web is a vast and wonderful place and
>Google is a very effective way to
>find the answer to any question you might have on virtually
>any topic. The value of SSWF is related, I believe, to the
>extent that it maintains a focus. If one has a problem
>with, say, printer drivers, then a quick trip to Google to
>search for the name of the printer, the OS and the word
>"driver" will reward the seeker with a long list of possible
>webpages containing the answer.
Well, Cy, I wouldn't have been able to locate the site Brett tipped me about on a simple google search (of which I'm an avid user), just in case you think the help I asked for was out of order.
>One would not, to extend your analogy, walk into a bar and
>say "Does any one here have a distributor cap for a '63
>Rambler coupe?" and expect to get a positive reply. Nor is
>it useful to sit on a stool in the Auto Parts Store drinking
>beer and strewing peanut shells all over the floor asking
>the customers if they have heard the latest Jackie Gleason
>joke.
Of course nobody would expect to find auto parts at a bar, but SSCLF is NOT exactly a bar.
And digital beer and peanuts won't get the SSCLF floors dirty, first because there is no floor, and second because digital beer has no foam, won't get you drunk, and digital peanuts have no shells.
>So I'm in favor of nuturing and developing the information
>archive aspects of the forum.
>
>But that's just me. SSWF is not specifically any of the
>analogies used.
>
>It is what everyone who posts here makes it.
>
>And those who come to visit get what we all leave behind.
>
>Perhaps they will enjoy any kind of BS that comes to our
>minds....
>
>Somehow--assuming they came to learn of control line and of
>stunt, I doubt it.
>
When I first discovered SSCLF the scene was the same as today, and I have been helped a LOT.
The inside jokes, the heated arguments and all the non related stuff never got in the way.
God bless ya!
Ion (want some peanuts?) Muniz