Steven Yampolsky · Dec 15, 2003 10:28 AM
#0 source[photo not recovered: Stiletto.jpg]
Steven Yampolsky 
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 17 of 17 known posts recovered
[photo not recovered: Stiletto.jpg]
Steven Yampolsky 
Stephen
The second pic is a later version - basically the .40/.46 version that won 3 World Championships. You can still get plans for that one thru Model Aviation (plan #193).
If you look on the plan on the upper left side it says Model Airplane News, June, 1974. It shows a half span of 63.8 cm or a bit over 50 inches. This should be his 35 size ship powered by an OS Max 35S (see notation under engine on plan).
Leonard Neumann
Len,
I thought the same thing but what put me off was a number of differences between the plans and this scan:
1) the plans show model title as 'STILLETO 35'. the scan omits the 35 message completely. As a matter of fact, someone put 55 next to the title implying that this could be a .55 powered version.
2) The rudder looks taller than the 35 plans.
I've tried looking at the AMA online archives to take a look at the June 1974 issue but the web site is down. 
Steven Yampolsky 
On 35 plans, fuselage cross section shows the triangular stock that holds the top of the turtledeck. The scan doesn't have it.
Steven Yampolsky 
I am not aware of a 55 version. There was a .40 and a .46.
However, there are metric measurements drawn onto the plan. A .35 cubic inch engine is a 5.7 cc. Could that be the reference to the 55? Anybody know of an OS Max 55?
Leonard Neumann
Steve;
If you look at the top of the plan, it shows the owner's conversion of the wingspan (inboard and outboard) to Metric from English. If you add the two together you get 137.9 cm. Divide that by 2.54 and you get a span of 54.29. I suspect the "55" refers to the wingspan in inches. There is also a tick mark after the 55. Normally, than means "feet" instead of inches (inches have two tick marks), but if the person doing the conversion was not very familiar with the English measuring system and abbreviations, this would be an easy mistake to make.
>
>2) The rudder looks taller than the 35 plans.
>
Again, if you you look at the picture, it looks as if someone has tried to erase the original outline. You can still see the remnants of the original outline on the plan. I suspect that this is the work of the onwer of the plans as he/she modified the outline to suit their tastes.
Can't tell if the handwritten notes were written in Italian or Spanish (or perhaps Portugese), but it definitely looks like a romance language. Interesting they took the original plans and converted it to metric for their use.
Just my observations, your mileage may vary...
Regards - Bob Kruger
>same span and area, same wing chord, different rudder shape,
I'm confused beyond recognition. Which version of the 35 plans is being sold today? I have a set with 'STILLETO 35' written on it.
>For a mere 300.00 for the two, plus shipping I'll sell you
>these two kits. Hurry, Christmas is only 10 days away. Get
>it for yourself, you deserve it, honest.
That would be indeed a VERY nice Christmas present alas too expensive for my blood. 
Let me get this straight. There are 5 versions of Stilleto out there:
1) Stilleto 35 short tail
2) Stilleto 35 tall tail
3) Stilleto 660
4) Stilleto XL
5) Stilleto 46.
Steven Yampolsky 
The plans you show are the Stiletto *35* plans from Model Airplane News. I don't believe the plans I sent you have "35" on them, just *Stiletto*, as there was no other size Stiletto when those were sent to be published. (??)
You will not find the June '74 MAN on the AMA site. 
They have been drawn on, and this seems to distort the original. I have the original article for this plane, and Les speaks of building three of them in that size. Could have been minor differences in each.
The second scan shows the Stiletto 660 (might have been known as .40-46 by some) which represents Les's WC plane. Any other kits, etc., would be take offs on these two basic designs. Tom Dixon did the XL, and it was not one of Les' planes.
AS usual, there can be variations in the series, but Les, AFAIK, had the two basic size planes. Any others might as well be attributed to someone else.
Les is a great guy, and I believe he would be glad to share info on these planes with you.
Bill <><
Disclaimer: I am neither a NATS Champion, engine reworker, engine producer, column writer, Hobby Shop owner, *rockeet* scientist, nor otherwise. Just an old Advanced flier. 

Allen Brickhaus
I've seen pictures from the 1975 Team Trials - that's where Les flew the 700 version of the Stilleto. (I know it was the "700" because the number "700" was stenciled prominently on the wing.)
To my knowledge, the 700 has never been published anywhere.
Allen Brickhaus