>Tuned pipes have been used by RC/pattern guys, I think.
>
>Since the waves won't do anything on the admission stage
>(the valves are closed) they just hit the closed exaust.
>
>On the exaust stage the combustion remnants will be sucked,
>giving the engine a better performance.
>
>I don't know if it's good for stunt, since I don't care so
>much for them four bangers...
>
>God bless you!
>
>In Christ,
>
>Ion
Ron B.
Ion:
It works exactly the same way as in a two stroke-cycle engine.The
valve overlap period in a four stroke is analogous to the blowdown period in a two stroke.Also like a two stroke,the effect of a pipe is very speed specific,and,again like a two stroke,can be broadened or narrowed by the configuration of the pipe.
As an experiment,I once set up a low speed (long) pipe on a Moki.61 I was developing for my Macchi 202.With a short header it would turn a 15-6 11,200;a 13-6 11200;an 11-6 you guessed it,11200.with a new(longer)header revs came down to 7800 on all the props.
The same sort of control is possible with a four stroke.The problem is that no one,to my knowlege,has done the necessary development work on four stroke pipes for P.A.,and I seriously doubt the existing pipes are going to be anywhere close to the requirement.As an extreme example of this,consider that some early four stroke engines used for driving pumps,and other similar equipment,had no speed control other than the length of the exhaust pipe.In dealing with engines we need to keep reminding ourselves that all the engines we use operate on the same cycle,the Otto cycle.the only real difference is the number of strokes of the piston needed to complete the cycle.