Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

KenHi Cougar

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 15 of 15 known posts recovered

robertc · Jan 15, 2004 08:58 AM

#0 source
I'm looking at this as a possiblity for Classic.
What's the verdict?

Robert Compton

Bill Little · Jan 15, 2004 10:20 AM

#1 source
Hi Robert,
I have seen the pics of a couple of these at VSC. I really like the looks of the plane. I think they fly pretty good from all accounts.
What power are you thinking of using?
Bill <><

Disclaimer: I am neither a NATS Champion, engine reworker, engine producer, column writer, Hobby Shop owner, *rockeet* scientist, nor otherwise. Just an old Advanced flier.

SRiese5283 · Jan 15, 2004 11:14 AM

#2 source
I'm on my third cougar. All I got to do is tissue and paint. SUPER plane. WAY over looked.

Scott Riese

Currell · Jan 15, 2004 12:35 PM

#3 source
Good one. I have the last Midwest version, with a Lightning Bolt McCoy 40.

Currell

Dick Fowler · Jan 15, 2004 12:36 PM

#4 source
Were these the same Cougars that were kitted by Midwest (I think)? I also liked the Panther in that group.

Anyone have some pictures of either or both?

Randy Ryan · Jan 15, 2004 12:37 PM

#5 source
LAST EDITED ON Jan-15-04 AT 12:43 PM (CDT)
 
Bill,

Depends on which Cougar. There were at least 3 versions the last of which was a Midwest redesign of Kenhi's second version. Got that? The first was a completely different airplane with full thickness built up flaps, not bad looking but not good flying. The second was the sleek beauty we all know and love but it has a VERY thin airfoil, nearly just a flat section at the tips. The Midwest I think would be the best of the lot. Midwest retained the good looks, it takes a good eye to tell the difference except for the airfoil which is truely an airfoil with a nice round LE. I haven't built the Midwest version but I have the Kenhi 2nd version. It was so-so as far as flying, much like the Panther of the same series. Midwest also redesigned that but lost allot of its asthetic appeal. I love both of these airplanes and plan to build a new Midwest Cougar soon.

Here's a shot of my Kenhi version powered with a Veco .35 TCC that eventually brought about the model's demise. Sorry about the picture quality. Way before digital and I ain't no photo snapper. It was done in silkspan and dope color K&B Superpoxy. About 40 oz if I remember right.

Randy Ryan
AMA 8500
SAM 36
I fly 'em all and love it!

Bill Little · Jan 15, 2004 12:42 PM

#6 source
Opps...... I was thinking of the Panther! LOL!!
My flying buddy, as a kid, had a Midwest Cougar that we wore completely out!
Disregard my "comments" about the KenHi "Cougar".
Old Timer's struck!
Bill <><


Disclaimer: I am neither a NATS Champion, engine reworker, engine producer, column writer, Hobby Shop owner, *rockeet* scientist, nor otherwise. Just an old Advanced flier.

Randy Ryan · Jan 15, 2004 12:51 PM

#7 source
OK, new missive!

The Kenhi Panther was a beautiful model, but suffered a horrible airfoil, thin and sharp. I managed to fly 480's with mine but that was probable about its limit when combined with my less then pretty flying. The Midwest version I'm sure is a better performer but it lost allot in the "Look-at-me" rating when they did the redesign.

Here's a shot of my scratch built Kenhi with Fox .35, 32 oz with silkspan and dope color topped off with Hobby Poxy clear. I crashed this model a Brodak's a few years ago in high winds. It still hangs in its place, just can't part with it.

Randy Ryan
AMA 8500
SAM 36
I fly 'em all and love it!

cyberflyer · Jan 16, 2004 05:05 AM

Panthers at VSC#8 source
LAST EDITED ON Jan-16-04 AT 05:06 AM (CDT)
 
> Hi Robert,
> I have seen the pics of a couple of these at VSC.
> I really like the looks of the plane.


http://www.clstunt.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=1571&forum=DCForumID1



Panther at VSC 2K2 (First picture in thread above)



Panther at VSC 2K3 (New Post)


[photo not recovered: 4007c5414c94d4b7.jpg]
Panther at VSC 2K3 (New Post)

Enjoy.

Cy

If it were easier than this, it
wouldn't be called a hack.

Randy Ryan · Jan 16, 2004 09:01 AM

RE: Panthers at VSC#9 source
LAST EDITED ON Jan-16-04 AT 11:13 AM (CDT)
 
These are both the Midwest Panthers. The Kenhi has a more sharply swept leading edge and shorter tail moment. IMO it really effects the looks of the model. But having seen them fly the pperformance is improved.

Randy Ryan
AMA 8500
SAM 36
I fly 'em all and love it!

Currell · Jan 16, 2004 09:59 AM

RE: Panthers at VSC#10 source
I had the first gen smaller Panther, but totalled it this Summer. Currell

Larry Cunningham · Jan 16, 2004 10:19 AM

RE: Panthers at VSC#11 source
Cy,

Nice photos. I notice the last one has some different focus patches on the grass areas. Did you touch out something?

Just curious.

[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]

"I have forced myself to contradict myself in order to avoid conforming to my own taste." -Marcel Duchamp

cyberflyer · Jan 16, 2004 10:35 AM

RE: Panthers in the blurry grass#12 source

The jpeg algorithm looks for transition lines and when it finds them narrows up its block size so that diagonal lines and fine detail don't get lost while large, roughly similar areas can get higher compression. So the amount of compression varies in different areas of the image. The more little transitions you have to preserve, the bigger the file. And the less you try to preserve, the more noticable the jpeg block artifacts are.

Well, the bright grass blades is nothing but high density information that is useless for our purposes.

So I get out the blur tool and blrr the area around the airplane so I can use a higher quality Jpeg compression setting and bring out the detail of the airplane and not include all the detailed info for the grass blades.

I'm just buying back a little file size at a higher fidelity.

Is it a distracting effect?

Cy.

If it were easier than this, it
wouldn't be called a hack.

dennis · Jan 16, 2004 12:01 PM

RE: Panthers in the blurry grass#13 source
by any act, error, or omission, I have, intentionally or
unintentionally, displayed any breedist, disciplinist, sexist, racist,
culturalist, nationalist, regionalist, localist, ageist, lookist, ableist,
sizeist, speciesist, intellectualist, socioeconomicist, ethnocentrist,
phallocentrist, heteropatriarchalist, or other violation of the rules of
political correctness, known or unknown, I am not sorry and I encourage you
to get over it.

I have a really nice mint Ken-Hi Panther kit. Any interest. Dennis

shholt · Jan 16, 2004 02:14 PM

RE: Panthers in the blurry grass#14 source

>I have a really nice mint Ken-Hi Panther kit. Any interest.
>Dennis

How much do you want for it?
Steve

The older I get, the better I used to fly!