LAST EDITED ON Jan-31-04 AT 01:41 PM (CDT) >Hmm, I was just going through my engines and found I still have a OS .25FX on
>the shelf. I remember this was a pretty sweet running engine when I had it in a
>plane. I'm almost tempted to see if it would fly the Nobler Seeing as many say
>they are even calming the .35s down a lil
I have two FX 25's. Stock, they spin way too fast for convenient use in aerobatics; they need a prop pitched flatter than just about anything you can find (if anyone made a 9- by 2 1/2, that might work).
Or, put a tuned pipe on it and keep it in the zone that way, but it will still need a special prop even that way. The ST 51 CL is tuned for a far more useful rpm range than any FX. I have (edited here - several models of OS Max 40's, including) an SF 40, which is similar to the FX 40 -- once again, we are looking at a special prop to match the rpm's to a good flying speed for flying aerobatics, or use a tuned pipe.
(edited, again - I do have a couple of sizes of the Mac's all-in-one muffler, but I just haven't had a suitable airframe to match those and any of the engines they fit. The combination of that muffler/pipe and an FX is relatively heavy for the nose length of the Nobler, as is the LA 40 suggested by Great Planes. I'd be trying hard, if I had one, to stay under 7 Ounces, the Classic era's 29/35 engine weight upper end.)
The ST 51 is a far different engine than the older ST 46's were. It matches to a Magnum very well. The very best match to the Nobler ARF available these days is the Brodak 40, but an L&J Fox (as noted above) is also an excellent choice. The Nobler is a medium size plane, not a large one. Most 40's are too big and heavy for it.
Kiwi
**
edited some because I overlooked the Mac All-in-1 possibility.