was wonerding if using one would affect
the engine run.
Engine over heating.
Excessive back pressure.
Power loss.
These deflectors are made of silicone
and approx. 31/2 inches long with 45
degree bend.
Jim Z
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 7 of 7 known posts recovered
Jim Z
Works pretty good on my airplane.
Brett
Now, if you aren't running your engine to its absolute fullest, (using a smaller prop, for instance, than the engine is capable of turning) it may work fine for you. Or you may be able to open up the venturi a size or two (or three) to enable more power output to overcome the power loss. Brett is probably in both camps (using a smaller prop and a larger venturi) and for him it works fine. For you it may work fine as well. But for Matt's 97 Stuka, the muffler was angled back and the outlet was quite close to the wing leading edge. We tried an exhaust deflector and it absolutely destroyed the power. Well, I suppose we could have gone back a prop size, but we chose to take the deflector off and let the exhaust blast the wing. It never hurt the dope finish. No harm, no foul.
Just remember, the longer the garden hose, the lower the pressure at the other end. Any additional plumbing, piping, tubing you put at the end of your exhaust outlet will affect the power in a negative way.
Leonard Neumann
There's not doubt that the smaller or longer it is, the more back-pressure it creates. Sometimes, it helps the power, and probably more of the time, it hurts the power. To be fussy, varying the length and ID of the deflector is another tuning feature that you can use to get it the way you want it. Of course, we are using the engines at 25% of their capability anyway, so if you have a restriction in one place, you can get rid of it somewhere else and get the power back.
I do know that if you run the exhaust through an arrowshaft from the pipe outlet 18" through to the tail of the airplane, it hurts the power.
Brett
See Ya NEAL