Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Sheet flap treatment

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 17 of 17 known posts recovered

Randy · Feb 18, 2004 08:36 PM

#0 source
HI folks,

OK, I'm finally starting my USA-1. The plan called for 1/4" sheet flaps. So, I really don't want to end up with a flexy flyer. Any thoughts on methods to stiffen these up. I usually use either epoxy and .50oz glass or epoxy and CF veil on thin sheet flaps. Any other methods out there.

Bill, any suggestions? How did you do the flaps on your USA-1?

Randy Powell

Bill Little · Feb 18, 2004 08:49 PM

#1 source
Hey Randy!
'bout time.
I had some very good "C" grain, kept the grain running parallel to the TE of the flap, and covered them with .2 oz. CF veil applied with copious amounts of nitrate.. Mine didn't flex.
Gonna start the replacement soon.
Bill <><


Just an Old Advanced flyer.

Randy · Feb 19, 2004 12:26 AM

#2 source
Thanks Bill.

I'll see what I come up with. I know that this is an airframe that simply cannot be heavy and I'm already thinking about keeping the structure as light as possible. I'm already replacing the 1/16" fuse doublers with CF and a few other tricks. I'll keep the Louisville Slugger designed main spar, but other areas need some lightening.

Randy Powell

godzilla · Feb 19, 2004 07:30 AM

#3 source
>Hey Randy!
>'bout time.
>I had some very good "C" grain, kept the grain running
>parallel to the TE of the flap, and covered them with .2 oz.
>CF veil applied with copious amounts of nitrate.. Mine
>didn't flex.

Polycrylic is even better than the nitrate.

Bill Little · Feb 19, 2004 08:15 AM

#4 source
Big Lizard,

I had already built the USA-1 before I found out about that. I am using polycrylic on the rebuild of the SV-11, but it's flaps are over 10 years old! So far, so good.

Bill <><

Just an Old Advanced flyer.

SteveMoon · Feb 19, 2004 08:32 AM

#5 source
Randy: My method over the years has also been, .2 oz CF Veil and Nitrate. But, after trying Polycrylic; I've got to agree with Brad, Polycrylic is the way to go. It's fast and easy to work with.

Steve

godzilla · Feb 19, 2004 10:30 AM

#6 source
>Randy: My method over the years has also been, .2 oz CF Veil
>and Nitrate. But, after trying Polycrylic; I've got to agree
>with Brad, Polycrylic is the way to go. It's fast and easy
>to work with.
>
>Steve

The super killer for strength is CF veil and Polycrylic.

Circle Burner · Feb 19, 2004 10:33 AM

#7 source
How do you keep the flaps from warping since Poly is water-based?

godzilla · Feb 19, 2004 11:59 AM

#8 source
>How do you keep the flaps from warping since Poly is
>water-based?

Lay them flat while they dry. Weight them down after they tack off over a non stick surface. Let fully dry that way.

Howard Rush · Feb 19, 2004 02:54 PM

#9 source
I'd use a carbon torque tube in the leading edge.

godzilla · Feb 19, 2004 04:41 PM

edited#10 source
>I'd use a carbon torque tube in the leading edge.

Interesting you should say that.

I am not really sure the most effective way to use carbon reinforcement would be in the leading edge. Using that method the internal moment of the flap (measured perpindicular from the flap hinge line) would still rely on a balsa moment arm. It seems to me that a tube in the CENTER of the flap with maybe a couple smaller tubes bored perpindicular through that tube, supported at opposite ends of the flap would reduce the twist spanwise most effectively.

Using that method the carbon tune would truly act as a torque tube, and the forces would be translated by carbon moment arms and not balsa. Also, the support would be at the furthest most tips of the flap spanwise.

Also the steel leg of the control horn should go through the tube also.

Anyway, it is a very cool method what you have done. Got us all thinking around here.

Howard Rush · Feb 19, 2004 08:50 PM

#11 source
This appears to be a corollary to your belief that prop gyroscopic moment decreases as the the prop gets closer to the CG.

Brett Buck · Feb 19, 2004 10:16 PM

#14 source
>This appears to be a corollary to your belief that prop
>gyroscopic moment decreases as the the prop gets closer to
>the CG.

Huh?

Brett

godzilla · Feb 20, 2004 06:40 AM

#15 source
>This appears to be a corollary to your belief that prop
>gyroscopic moment decreases as the the prop gets closer to
>the CG.

Ouch.

Howard Rush · Feb 19, 2004 09:02 PM

#12 source
I think I put the tube at the LE because they had a lot of 3/8" aluminum tubing at the surplus store. I made the carbon tubes by winding prepreg around aluminum tubes. That resulted in .40"-OD carbon tubes, which were too big to go elsewhere in the flap. Besides, it made for a nice, round LE. Having the tube farther aft would avoid hinge slits, but would also cause torsion stress to go up for the same amount of material. One could also compare the tube-to-rib stresses, I reckon, for a little tube surrounded by rib to that of a big tube with rib on just one side. Paul's the stress guy, but if you ask him where to put the carbon tube, he'd probably tell you to put it in the elevator pushrod, rather than the flap.

Randy · Feb 19, 2004 09:51 PM

#13 source
Howard,

Only quesitons I have are, how do you cook the CF under pressure after wraping it around the tube? And what sort of respirator do you wear when dumping HCl down the thing to melt the aluminum?

Randy Powell

preston · Feb 20, 2004 01:07 PM

#16 source
>Only quesitons I have are, how do you cook the CF under
>pressure after wraping it around the tube? And what sort of
>respirator do you wear when dumping HCl down the thing to
>melt the aluminum?

Wrap it in Fascal, which shrinks when you heat it.
Working outdoors, dip the result in a tall, skinny "bucket" of acid.
Let it sit for a while.

Preston