Tim McTigue · Feb 25, 2004 06:49 AM
#0 sourceTim
MAAC 65703
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 15 of 15 known posts recovered
Tim
MAAC 65703
Just an Old Advanced flyer.
The MAN plans were drawn from memory, also, without having the plane in front of him. Now, I wonder, how many of us can draw plans from memory and get them right? For that matter, how many of us actually build from plans and get them exact? Since George apparently didn't have plans to begin with (If he did, why not use them?) it amazes me how accurate he was in drawing both the MAN plans from memory and the kit plans and how close they both are to each other and to the original. I have a copy of the plans that George himself drew after he dismantled his crashed plane and took accurate measurements and they are close.
So, the MAN plans and the later published "accurate" plans are both OT legal because they were built or published prior to the cut off date. But the Green Box plans are not OT legal even though they are as close to accurate as were the MAN plans. And, the truth be told, you will probably not be able to tell a bit of difference in flying ability between either of the three choices.
Leonard Neumann
George
Thanks, guys, for the replies so far. What I'm really interested in is knowing about some of the chronology not so much of the development of the plane, but more like stories of it in competition - i.e. accounts of which years it was flown at the Nats (i.e., continuously from '51 thru '57, or were there years it was not), which year(s) he won with it, etc. Not too tall an order, eh? I guess I'm just thinking if those who were there (or who've heard stories passed down) were to post them up here, it'd make interesting and enlightening reading. I never got to know George, and I was on some of the same message boards as he was before he passed, but I don't really remember reading much from him, although I was just starting out, and not ready to absorb a whole lot at the time. I think it's a good thing to try to keep legends like that alive, so I'm kind of hoping a few people will remember some cool things to post here...
Tim
MAAC 65703
They were watching a hotshot fly that had amost won stunt at the Nats. The guy started his airplane (which looked like a team racer) and took off. Red remarked, "poor guy, he got a rich run". The airplane putted around the circle, and attempted the wingover. Red and Larry thought that it would crash, but it completed the wingover, and the pattern , and also won the contest!
The airplane was the Nobler, and the pilot was George Aldrich.
De Hill
Jake
"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".
Did the lines let go, or did it just come in on him. George told me on several occasions that he refused to back up for an airplane. I think that cost him a couple of planes.
Leonard Neumann
I wonder what that did for the judges. "OK, Larry, how did you score that maneuver?"
Perhaps the one I was thinking of was at VSC. It was more recent for sure. I can understand his desire that the plane stay out on the lines and that you work to trim it properly so that it (most of the time) will. However, there are "situations" that arise when the lines can go slack. And if that ever happens, then it is time to run. George was one, I think, who would just stand there and watch it and then say, "Well, it was your own fault."
Leonard Neumann
Jim Pollock