Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

All American ARF.

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 18 of 18 known posts recovered

gtrbaby · Mar 17, 2004 07:49 PM

#0 source
There are a number of these for sale on the Bay...

I am not trying to sell them or advertise them.....just noted they have the leadouts in the starboard wing....Was this kit designed to fly anti-clockwise?????????


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3182534774&category=34054

In the battle of airplane V ground, the ground is yet to lose.

Bill Little · Mar 17, 2004 07:54 PM

#1 source
Hi Wynn,
Yep!
For whatever reasons, don't need to go into that now, a lot of the early guys flew clockwise. George Aldrich always did. There are a few guys who still do now!
Bill <><

Just an Old Advanced flyer.

Jake · Mar 17, 2004 08:07 PM

#3 source
Yep!

Jake

"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".

Steve Helmick · Mar 17, 2004 08:00 PM

#2 source
LAST EDITED ON Mar-17-04 AT 08:02 PM (CDT)
 
"Was this kit designed to fly anti-clockwise?????????"

Yes, indeed. That should keep the price fairly reasonable. On the other hand, if the wing isn't installed yet (sounds like maybe it isn't), it may be possible to "correct" this. It could also be a reversed photo negative, tho not very likely. Somebody should email the guy and find out.

Other thoughts...from the LOOK of the balsa, it isn't light. On the other hand, DeBolt kits used very hard balsa, but by using very little of it, the weights were quite good. I built my bro a Livewire "Rebel" for Christmas about '85. All wood came from my scrap box, spruce spars, etc, yet quite light. Steve

Kiwi · Mar 17, 2004 08:39 PM

#4 source
>I am not trying to sell them or advertise them.....just noted they have the leadouts in
>the starboard wing....Was this kit designed to fly anti-clockwise?

Not only anti-clockwise, the inboard wing is a full (3 to 4") rib panel longer than the outboard wing. When CL was getting started, many of the early spark ignition engines available offered rather puny power compared to the glow engines that finally arrived after 1947. They adopted a lot of measures in the early days that were eventually found to be less useful than was once thought (such as rudder offset).

Hal deBolt was among the very early CL designers/ kit producers, and knew that engine torque might help keep the planes out on the ends of the lines during takeoffs and landings. But All Amerrican Seniors are STILL a big thrill at takeoff if you aren't ready for their antics, whatever engine you use, with whatever power it has.

.

Kiwi

**

gtrbaby · Mar 17, 2004 08:53 PM

#5 source
hey Kiwi,
are you really a KIWI or is that just your login name?

If you are a Kiwi. where abouts in NZ are you from?

In the battle of airplane V ground, the ground is yet to lose.

Jake · Mar 17, 2004 09:01 PM

#6 source
I think he really are one, as he were born thar- least that's they way I heered it told ta' me! Hey Kiwi, just wanted to steal your thunder!

Grins,

Jake

"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".

Kiwi · Mar 17, 2004 09:17 PM

#7 source
>If you are a Kiwi. where abouts in NZ are you from?

Born on North Island at Palmerston North. A very long time ago.

.

Kiwi

**

gtrbaby · Mar 17, 2004 09:21 PM

#8 source
OH ok......I went to Massey University for a couple of years in Palmy ......I grew up in Taranaki now live in Auckland YUCK......

In the battle of airplane V ground, the ground is yet to lose.

Kiwi · Mar 17, 2004 09:32 PM

#9 source
For many years when I was younger, I had a wish to some day see NZ again, to take a vacation there "some day". But there was never any job out of those I held that paid well enough to afford that expensive of a trip.

.

Kiwi

**

GravityWell · Mar 18, 2004 01:40 AM

#10 source
I have sent them an email asking if they will ship the plane with the wing uninstalled. That way the wing can simply be put in from the other end!

“I have never crashed, but I have proven the theory that gravity sucks!”
Glenn Reach
[email protected]

jaco · Mar 18, 2004 04:10 AM

#11 source
Also may want to check out the website for some more info
on putting it together. Still no mention of weight.
http://www.schwingrc.com/

"ANYTHING WORTH DOING IS WORTH OVER DOING"

dickbyron · Mar 18, 2004 05:26 AM

#12 source
My clock runs clockwise.-> ->. We mostly fly counter clockwise. <- <-

"stinkin" cable guy

LNeumann · Mar 18, 2004 08:09 AM

#14 source
>My clock runs clockwise.-> ->. We mostly fly counter
>clockwise. <- <-

Mine is a digital clock. Now what?

Leonard Neumann

LNeumann · Mar 18, 2004 08:12 AM

#15 source
>I have sent them an email asking if they will ship the plane
>with the wing uninstalled. That way the wing can simply be
>put in from the other end!

OK, they are making these things. Evidently they set up a line and make a few at a time. But they fly RC, what do they know? Maybe we (or someone) should tell them that most people don't fly them the way the plan shows. They might just make it with the leadouts coming out the other side. And while they are at it, put in an adjustable leadout. They followed the plan too meticulously. The leadout spacing is too wide.

Leonard Neumann

Currell · Mar 18, 2004 06:58 AM

#13 source
).
>
>Hal deBolt was among the very early CL designers/ kit
>producers, and knew that engine torque might help keep the
>planes out on the ends of the lines during takeoffs and
>landings.
>


K: Torque at landings? Are these AASs three line jobs?

Currell

Crash2much · Mar 18, 2004 02:32 PM

#16 source
If you read their ad entirely from beginning to end you will see that they state that they will put the leadouts whichever way you want them.

Bill

I have no claim to fame, I build more planes than I fly, collect more kits than I build. That about says it, right?

gtrbaby · Mar 18, 2004 02:57 PM

#17 source
Yes it does say that, but that was an edit to the description.

My original post should have read "did these fly CLOCKWISE " not anti-clockwise....oh well. it is interesting non the less.

In the battle of airplane V ground, the ground is yet to lose.