Most Beautiful Ringmaster's
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 40 of 40 known posts recovered
I confess to having a sort of love/hate relationship with the old F.I.T. (Flying Iron Toad) through the years, fortunately I have so far mangaged to keep it under contol.
Jake
"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".
Ah, yes, the S-1 Ringmaster. I built my first Ring in 1955 and have had at least one in flying condition, continuously, for the last 49 years. At present, I have two flying, one with a Fox .35 stunt and the other with a Fox .29 stunt. I have three more Sterling S-1 kits waiting their turn to take to the air. The greatest control-line ships of all time have to be the Sterling S-1 Ringmaster and the Top Flite Nobler, not necessarily in that order. Truly........a great ship!
Terrence Durrill
KnightFlite · Apr 05, 2004 10:02 PM
#3 source
PaulSteve Scott · Apr 05, 2004 11:52 PM
#4 sourceI think they're a great sport C/L and (to me at least) will always be THE classic of all designs.
Not everyone loves Chevrolet but few dislike the '57 Chevy...
ty marcucci · Apr 06, 2004 01:01 AM
#5 source
Circle Burner · Apr 06, 2004 06:56 PM
#7 sourceMine, from a Sterling kit, tips the scales at 34.25 oz
That is RTF, minus fuel and after multiple rebuilds
Sweet Ring you have there! Very clean. I need a "Cartman" decal for mine. That would be hillarious!
I have 3 Ringmasters and the best is my Twin ,2 FP 15's and its a really great flyer.My oldest Ringmaster is over 30 years old and still flying Fox 29 Yellow silk and dope , with a Dubro Strap on muffler,26oz Orignal Sterling Kit. See Ya NEAL
Bob Reeves · Apr 06, 2004 09:15 PM
#10 sourceHey, I know this is about RingMasters and most of you have already seen the TwistMaster but we do have a few newbees..
This is a Twister with Ted's numbers that looks like a RingMaster. It helped me get from beginning Intermediate to Advanced. Placed 3rd in Intermediate profile at Brodaks two years ago and carried the airborne Video package when we made the in-flight video of the fuel tank. My two favorite profiles in one package.
Larry Cunningham · Apr 07, 2004 09:56 AM
#19 source[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]
"Taste is the enemy of creativity." -Pablo Picasso
Patrick Rowan · Apr 06, 2004 10:29 PM
#11 sourceI broke the nose off once. Now wieghs almost 28 oz. Fox .35 GMA, Blue Majic head.
Fly Stunt
C/L Gee Bee · Apr 07, 2004 12:59 AM
#12 sourceWow, that Twistmaster. Impressive!
I'm framing up 2 re-kits of S1 now, 'just for wife Joey and self to fly'...But, Wow, that Twistmaster.
P.S.: De Ja Vous is Beautiful!!!
Mike in Atwater,
'When I fly, the plane gets nervous'
Here's my '51 Harry Williamson design full-body Ringmaster. Fox 35 power, one flight so far - I think it needs a trim tab. This will be my model for Vintage Stunt comps here "Down-Under"
*Edited as I got Harry's surname wrong...
and yes, I built this because I thought it looked "cute" too
I don't know why some folk give the Ringmaster such a hard time I think that she is a great looking airplane.
Dwayne
I mean: the tip outlines of the wing vs the stab certainly don't match. No design continuity here. The rudder sitting way ahead of the stab/el is kind of strange, at least in some eyes. The fuse is a bit bulky.
Come to think of it, the Streak doesn't win a lot of beauty contests, either. But Beauty Is As Beauty...At least in this case.
The Carl Goldberg Shoestring/Buster/Cosmic Wind trio gets the styling nod, I suppose, for styling, as far as popular models are concerned.
Of the Sig trio, maybe the Twister does it for me. And the Magician.
Currell
Circle Burner · Apr 07, 2004 07:50 AM
#16 sourceI don't think the looks have much to do with the Ringmaster or Flite Streak preferences.
I think it is more like the Ford vs Chevy battle. People can't really explain it but they always like one and hate the other. Personally, the Flite Streak has never done anything for me, I don't hate them I just prefer the Ringmaster.
John
ty marcucci · Apr 07, 2004 03:25 PM
#22 source
Steve Scott · Apr 07, 2004 04:33 PM
#24 source>anchovies, or something.
Or Guiness Extra Stout?
>I mean: the tip outlines of the wing vs the stab certainly
>don't match. No design continuity here. The rudder sitting
>way ahead of the stab/el is kind of strange, at least in
>some eyes. The fuse is a bit bulky.
The non-match has never bothered me. The RM was the first non ½A model I had ever seen. I thought they all looked like that.
>Come to think of it, the Streak doesn't win a lot of beauty
>contests, either. But Beauty Is As Beauty...At least in this
>case.
The P-51 Mustang was beautiful - and functional. The F-4 Phantom was, well, functional.
>The Carl Goldberg Shoestring/Buster/Cosmic Wind trio gets
>the styling nod, I suppose, for styling, as far as popular
>models are concerned.
I was never impressed with the Buster for looks.
>Of the Sig trio, maybe the Twister does it for me. And the
>Magician.
I never considered the Twister as particularly attactrive. The classic era I-beamers? Absolutely!
>Phantom was, well, functional.
In the early 1970's, I saw a sign in the engineering department of the McDonnell-Douglas faciility in St Louis with this:
Phantom (Fan'tum) The triumph of thrust over aerodynamics.
Keith
Harry Williamson designed his Ringmaster that looks exactly like that in the photos. I think that Stephen might have missed on the last name of the designer. Williamson's Ringmaster was published in Model Airplane News in October, 1951. It is very similar to the configuration that Williamson used for the Gyrator published in MAN, October 1951, except the Gyrator had a more forward canopy, a differnt shaped vertical tail, and wing mounted gear. Both designs have been flown competitively in OTS contests here in the states.
Keith
Larry Cunningham · Apr 07, 2004 09:53 AM
#18 sourceBTW, I have no problems with Sterling Ringmasters, I just don't happen to believe they are incredibly capable, fabulous stunt ships.. JMO. 
[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]
"The lift is being fixed for the next day. During that time we regret that you will be unbearable." -In a Bucharest hotel lobby
J
"It'll probably feel real good again, once it quits hurting".
ty marcucci · Apr 07, 2004 07:35 PM
#29 source
I've not flown it much, mainly because I never have the right fuel for the Fox 35.
Jim Amos
Gary Widmer · Apr 07, 2004 01:10 PM
#21 sourceI seem to recall that someone had a 20 point RM at the VSC a few years ago. Pictures might be on the PAMPA website, but I'm not sure. Can someone help me out here?
>I seem to recall that someone had a 20 point RM at the VSC a
>few years ago. Pictures might be on the PAMPA website, but
>I'm not sure. Can someone help me out here?
Edit>>
My first real plane was a RM JR. My Ringmaster S-1 is still in the shrinkwraped box waiting for me to build it.
End Edit>>
There is a picture of one posted on the aeromanicas gallery page. Says it's a 20 pointer. Is this the one you were thinking about?
Finch
Gary Widmer · Apr 07, 2004 06:09 PM
#27 sourceIt is beautiful. Even if it is a Ringmaster. A great example of "Excess. Everything to excess."
If Brett gets off his 16-hour shifts he might tell us more. Or maybe Ted could fill in, surely that new model is done by now.
Dan
>Finch doesn't remember the model as Jim drug it to the NW
>Regionals at least once.
>
>It is beautiful. Even if it is a Ringmaster. A great example
>of "Excess. Everything to excess."
>
>If Brett gets off his 16-hour shifts he might tell us more.
>Or maybe Ted could fill in, surely that new model is done by
>now.
>
>Dan
Ah, but Dan I am a Virginia Finch and due to the long distances and fatigue on the wings I don't get out west all that much. The first time I saw this picture on the Aeromanics website I could never forget about it. That Ringer is a work of art. The internet is such a great place.
There is one more image of an RM that I am looking for but am having difficulty finding it. When I do I'll post it.
The Fresh
Finch
Well, maybe not beautiful, but I liked it. It still lives (20 yrs later) but it doesn't look as good anymore.
Herman Green:+
KnightFlite · Apr 07, 2004 05:11 PM
#25 sourcerichardhfcl · Apr 07, 2004 07:23 PM
#28 source Funny you should mention that! Several guys in this area have
built larger-sized Ringmasters (1.25 X and 1.33 X) and the thicker
airfoils from the enlargement fly better than the original 1 X.
Parts being put together to form a Ring-Streak with the fuse of
the Ringmaster and the wing of a Flite-Streak seem to work fairly well, too.
The original S-1 with a Fox .35 and a Perfect # 11 tank and a
Top Flight nylon 10 / 6 prop. is awfully hard to beat for fun, though.
The Ringmaster is like an old shoe , comfortable and dependable, nothing to go to the dance with, but a great friend for a Sunday afternoon. Here's a couple of my friends.
OK I'll try again with the pics
Rog aka: 66ragman aka: ROF aka: several other non endearing names per Mrs. 66ragman
>
>OK I'll try again with the pics
>
>
CR
Michael Schmitt · Apr 12, 2004 07:34 PM
#38 sourceAirborne Super Ringmaster
Michael Schmitt
Bill Little · Apr 12, 2004 07:44 PM
#39 sourceBill <><
(gotta get a pic of it posted)
Just an Old Advanced flyer.