>Disclaimer: It's been a LONG time since I have built, so
>I'm a bit (a lot) clueless.
>
>1) How would you compare Sig kits with Brodak kits in terms
>of wood, instructions, etc, etc.?
>
SIG and Brodak both produce and sell what I call mass-market kits. As such, one cannot expect all the wood to be equivalent to what you might hand-pick for each application. As to instructions, SIG kits are really quite good in this area, especially if Mikey had a hand in writing them. I have been told Brodak's instructions are quite complete.
If you want really top-notch wood in your next kit you will be looking to specialty suppliers.
>2) How would you compare the Twister with a built up
>Oriental in terms of build time/complexity and flying, etc,
>etc.?
>
Apples and oranges; there is no easy way to make a comparison. The Oriental with a built-up fuselage will require more effort in fabrication. On the other hand, it is not a complex design by any stretch. And there has never been a Twister, stock or modified, which flew better than an average Oriental.
>My old Twister was a great plane, until I smashed it to tiny
>little bits. Even took out the motor
Dang horizontal
>8s!
Go for the Oriental. If you crash it, there will be even more pieces, plus most of them will be smaller.