Mike Haverly · Oct 06, 2001 12:24 AM
#0 sourceMike Haverly
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 7 of 7 known posts recovered
Mike Haverly
Randy
Bill Hummel
Mike
Mike Haverly
The first two were the usual flat-top piston type, with the usual PDP porting. They wouldn't break back to a four cycle until the power had been just about totally subtracted with multiple head gaskets, leaving way too "soft" of a two-cycle. I had one with ordinary loop-scavenged style porting (no piston fence that I can recall inside, but there was an external tipoff that it's not the same as the others).
The bypass is straight-sided instead of flared. There is also supposed to be a straight-sided 46 that is "economical" on fuel as well, but rather hard to locate. I would love to find one of those for a stunter of mine that I built with a permanently mounted 4 ounce tank in it!
I also tried lowering the pitch on the props and letting the first pair of 40's rev up, but AFAIK there weren't any carbon fiber props being sold when I experimented with the first two (1975 or perhaps the year after). Even on 12-4's, they still wanted to run as lean after a maneuver as they did before it, so they seemed to gradually be faster and faster, on any fuel (and yes, on a uniflow vented tank).
The 46 I tried instead is/was such a sweet-running one I often think it might be worth the rebuilding effort to cut the nose up for a 5 1/2 ounce tank to be installed.
Kiwi
.
I got them from Big Jim Greenaway in the early 80s, as used engines, for $50.00 each.
The venturis are 273s , OS MAX NVA, and they have both been decompressed with three gaskets. They are completely user friendly and have a super stunt break. I think that they are just as friendly as the 46s but not nearly as powerfull.
I have used mine for a long time and they just keep going and going!
Ken