Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

yet another polycrylic question

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 5 of 5 known posts recovered

mcm · Apr 20, 2004 09:53 PM

#0 source
Wouldn't want to perfect a technique. So, I'm changing something on every single plane and will try polycrylic next. Went to buy some and I was faced with "gloss," "semi-gloss," and "satin." Hmmmm. What to do. What to do.

Randy Powell · Apr 20, 2004 11:14 PM

#1 source
M,

Hmm, I used the gloss, but I'm not sure it makes much difference. Might.

Iskandar Taib · Apr 21, 2004 06:48 AM

#2 source
Satin might be better - rougher, for adhesion of additional paint.

TigreST · Apr 21, 2004 07:32 AM

#3 source
LAST EDITED ON Apr-21-04 AT 07:33 AM (CDT)
 
Gloss may give up a better indication of where you've sanded and where not as you will have the gloss -v- no gloss effect (after scuffing), perhaps. (Assuming there is in fact a sheen when gloss is applied. Have not used it myself.) I was looking at cans of "Home Hardwares" own branded product yesterday,.ie; Beauty Tone. What is the prefered brand name of choice?

Tony

Baron · Apr 21, 2004 09:44 PM

#4 source
Yes, it does show where you've sanded. I used some of both recently. However, the satin seems to sand easier. I guess less solids, or something. On the gloss, it seems once you cut through the harder surface, it's about the same. I'm finishing up my new plane now, and I, for one, have NOT perfected the polycrylic technique. It worked fine, but I think I was trying too hard, or something. It's supposed to be faster, but it took me a lot longer. It's really a pain if you do what I did. I covered the wood surfaces with CF, which was no problem, but the open bays got polyspan. THAT was the pain! Took a lot of work to get it blended in and smooth. I'll approach it differently next time. Maybe I'm a slow learner.

Craig Beskow