Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

OS 25 FSR

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 14 of 14 known posts recovered

Bill Little · May 10, 2004 10:20 AM

#0 source
Any information on running this engine in stock form? I have a good one set up for C/L use w/ stock venturi and OS NVA.. Prop, fuel? Wet 2?
TIA
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

fly123 · May 10, 2004 05:05 PM

#1 source
Certainly haven't gotten mine dialed in the way I want it yet but I can share what I have done so far.

First of all, my engine doesn't say FSR on it anywhere. I'm basing the engine designation/type on a thread here in SSW that showed a photo of what I've got. Dual BB, etc. The experts called it an FSR. It is definitely pre-FP.

This engine makes some serious power for it's size. Mine is mounted in a SuperClown. Way more power than the plane needs. If I optimized it one way, it might make a great non-scale, no-class-to-race-in racer. Best detuning to match the S-Clown so far is to run extra head gaskets and 25-30% oil. (If you want to know the total shim height I'll have to check my notes tonight.) I'd also have to check to see what the OS venturi ID is; .262 sticks in my head. I'm using an OS needle valve assembly, which I believe is .135 diameter. I've been using 10% nitro because that's what the LHS had. It might be a lot smarter to start with 5%. I've been using an OS 762 stock muffler. I've tried regular vented tanks and uniflow. Regular seemed to work as good, and didn't have siphoning issues. I have consistently used muffler pressure with the fuel system. Last trip to the field I tried a Bruline air filter with the dual intent of restricting the venturi a bit and getting clean air in the bargain. I'm flying from an asphalt surface.

I'm still trying to get the fuel system sorted out again after a flameout trying to learn overhead eights. The fuel consumption of this setup is highly dependent on my initial setting. I might get eight minutes on a 3 oz. tank with the takeoff rpm's a little fast. Unfortunately, it can run out at 6 minutes if you set it a little rich -- but with enough power to "try out" a few manuevers. Hence, my bonehead. Before my last "incident," the engine was nearly tamed! Fast 4-stroke with a soft break. On my wish list is a tachometer, so I can perhaps gain some consistency....

I have run with wood (Zinger?) 9-5's, Master Airscrew 9-6 and 9-5's. I recently bought a Brodak BY&O 10-4 to try out. Hoping it will retain the line tension and slow the plane down a little. Haven't tried an APC 9-4 yet. Every time I ask, they are back-ordered. Not really anxious to start propping one of those anyway....

Let me know if there is any specific info you think would be helpful.

Dave
LA_Flyer

Bill Little · May 10, 2004 05:30 PM

#2 source
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the reply.
I have the same set up minus extra head shims. Everything is "stock".
I have a Super Clown with a McCoy RH 29 on a 9-5 BY&O, so your info gives me an idea as to the "power" of the engine. You mentioned a 4-2 break, wasn't sure if this engine would do that before I got this reply. I guess I will have to hunt up some shims. I will be starting with 5% nitro, and see how it goes. Got a bunch of 9 and 10 inch props in the 4-5 pitch range. Even a cut down undercamber eather 3 blade, 3 3/4 pitch, that has worked on a couple Webras.
Thanks for the set up, it does sound like a good starting point!
Just got to figure out what beast I am going to try it on first! LOL!!
Later,
Bill <><


When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

fly123 · May 10, 2004 09:13 PM

#3 source
Bill,

I would certainly try the "let it scream" approach if you have a 10-4 or 10-3(?) prop to test. I simply haven't gotten that far. Trying to make one run slow and break predictably might always be second best. I haven't gotten far enough to know that. The one thing that I definitely lost with the "run fast" method is an engine rpm change that warns of pending fuel exhaustion. Since I've dinged mine twice now because of that, maybe that is affecting my approach....

I'll try to get the venturi and head shim measurements tonight. Although I am using an unmodified OS venturi, I wouldn't say that I am using the stock venturi, because this engine came with an RC carb. As has been pointed out many times by the SSW experts, even OS may not know what was standard on some engines....

Let me know how your setup works out. I can use the help!

Dave
LA_Flyer

PS-The engine you have wouldn't be the George Aldrich engine, would it? I really wanted another .25FSR to back up the one I have.

Bill Little · May 10, 2004 09:39 PM

#4 source
Dave,
No, I didn't get the Aldrich one. I'm sure it is a nice one!
A buddy gave me this one (it was an R/C version, too) and I found the replacement OS venturi, so I'm not sure what it is either! He never ran it, his son moved on to bigger pattern planes before it got used.
We have had a lot of luck running the Webra 28, and I think this engine will be similar. We used various 10-4 props on the 28, so i might just start the 25 on one of those. The Webra had the blowdown reduced, but the 25 hasn't.
I'll let you know how it does!
Thanks,
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

LNeumann · May 11, 2004 09:03 AM

#5 source
The timing shouldn't be much different from the FP, but you should find it to work better with a smaller venturi. The .262 mentioned above would be good on an unmodified .35 or .40. Try about a .238 and see what that does. Use prop pitch to set lap speed once you get the engine running the way you want it.

Leonard Neumann

fly123 · May 11, 2004 09:05 PM

#6 source
Bill and Leonard,

I confirmed last night by measurement that I have a .262" ID OS venturi in my .25FSR. After getting some input from Leonard previously, I was going to try to effectively reduce this by using the air cleaner. I don't have any conclusions there yet because something is wrong with my tank from my last "incident." Guess I'll have to open up the tank to figure it out. The first half runs just fine. I suspect that the pickup tube is bent away from the corner. The plane nearly quits, then alternately surges and idles for MANY laps. My first attempt to pop off the front of the tank was not sucessful....

I could not immediately put my hands on the total shim set thickness. It had one shim in it when I received it. (This was a crashed RC garage sale engine.) I know I added one or more that I made from ???? material. I'll keep looking....

Dave
LA_Flyer

Zeke McCoy · May 11, 2004 09:24 PM

#7 source
Having just gotten a .25 FSR, for ARF Flightstreak, was hunting around found this.The FSR is from 1977. Seems I was caught in a time freeze, sticking to Fox motors, and overlooking other stuff. Kind of like a Harley attitude...an oil leak is 'charactar'.


http://www.osengines.com/history/ostimeline06.html

fly123 · May 12, 2004 12:27 AM

#8 source
Zeke,

Wow! Awesome website, thanks. Yep, that proves that what I have is an OS .25FSR. I didn't realize they came as -S or control line engines. Wish they posted specs for venturi size....

That FSR is gonna make your Streak really haul. If you decide to use a tamer motor, let me know. I'm looking for a backup for my .25FSR.

As far as time warps, I had no idea that the engine was that old! 1977!!! And since you mentioned Harleys, I found an early reference to a Steve Wittman homebuilt aircraft called the Hardly Ableson, powered by, I assume a thumping twin? Fits right in with Fox .35 nostalgia and vibration....

Dave
LA_Flyer

Zeke McCoy · May 12, 2004 04:46 AM

#9 source
I once suggested to a guy building an experimental airplane; considering a strong market loyalty already exhisting, why not sell Harley powered airplanes? You would have people that would just have to have one.

What he said in response was, 'You're taking a fourteen thousand dollar motorcycle, to make a two thousand dollar airplane.

LNeumann · May 12, 2004 08:36 AM

#10 source
Remember, this is an iron piston engine. Treat it accordingly. They like castor. Do not use cheap RC fuel.

Also, speed on your airplane is going to be determined by rpm and pitch. Prop it accordingly and it will not be any faster than anything else. Just because a Mack truck has a lot of power, doesn't mean it will move down the highway faster than your VW. It all depends on the gearing and the throttle.

Now, as to the homebuilt airplane, where do you get one of these for $2000? Even the price of components, much less the price of kits for even the least expensive of airplanes has gone through the roof.

Leonard Neumann

Zeke McCoy · May 12, 2004 11:47 AM

#11 source

>
>Now, as to the homebuilt airplane, where do you get one of
>these for $2000? Even the price of components, much less
>the price of kits for even the least expensive of airplanes
>has gone through the roof.

This was a few years ago.. and it was just a passing comment. But an airplane with a Harley engine, would you want to fly in one?

fly123 · May 12, 2004 03:07 PM

#12 source
It'd put hair on your chest!

Well, a HD engine in a plane would probably either make what you got gray, or make the gray that you've got fall out....

Having purchased an NIB Lycoming O-320 for about $20k, buying a Harley for $14k and "throwing away" the bike wouldn't be out of the question, except that there aren't any really good airplane engines except for airplane engines...!

I can't see any reason to even try the v-twin due to the high vibration levels. And reliability.... It would be interesting to know just which engine Steve used. Remember, back then builders even thought that a cast iron Model A engine was workable. I'm amazed every time I look at my Dad's old Ford tractor with that same engine....

Didn't have time to find the shim records last night. Sorry.

Dave
LA_Flyer

Zeke McCoy · May 12, 2004 03:42 PM

#13 source

>
>I can't see any reason to even try the v-twin due to the
>high vibration levels. And reliability.... It would be
>interesting to know just which engine Steve used. Remember,
>back then builders even thought that a cast iron Model A
>engine was workable. I'm amazed every time I look at my
>Dad's old Ford tractor with that same engine....
>
>Didn't have time to find the shim records last night. Sorry.
>
>Dave
>LA_Flyer

You are catching on, a plane like this wouldn't be worth much, oh maybe about $2,000.