Ryan
Balance CG Problem with Arf Nobler
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 17 of 17 known posts recovered
Ryan
While I wish to emphasize that I have absolutely *no hands-on experience* with the O.S. 35FP, based upon a fair amount of flying and testing with the 20FP and 25FP motors, I wouldn't automatically toss that stock muffler in the trash.
In any case, the model *must* balance properly. At some point ya just have to stick in the extra weight. And then lie about it to your buddies.
Dan
Peter Hess · May 11, 2004 08:48 PM
#3 sourceYou have probably thought of these things, but consider getting a tongue muffler and replacing the metal spinner with a lighter plastic one. You might still have to add a little tail weight, but the end result will a whole lot lighter than adding all of the tail weight you propose.
Peter Hess
Canton, CT
>flights. I have a CG problem with it for balancing it. It
>is WAY Nose heavy. With an empty tank it takes 4 oz of tail
>weight with the spinner off. I have an os fp 35 in it with
>stock muffler and a great planes uluminum spinner. I alreay
>added two oz of tail weight but it still is way nose heavy
>and down want to climb up. Should I have 2 more oz's?? I'm
>going to go flying tomorrow probably with it, so hopefully I
>can get it flying right even with it getting to be a brick.
>Anyone have this problem?
>Ryan
I'm not sure if this is the answer but with my arf nobler, I used a Brodak 40 with a tongue muffler and set the motor as close to the firewall as possible and then used a 3/4" prop spacer adaptor made by Fox. While the motor is mounted close to the firewall I had hoped this would help any possible vibration problems. Mine seemed to balance fine with no added tailweight.
Rob Duckering....MAAC #14457
www.acfc.ca
Sound to me that changing the muffler and spinner is not going to be enough.
When I build, I set everthing up together and find where the motor needs to be to ballance the plane before comitting to engine placement. Depending on size of plane, compensate about 5 -10 mm for finish adding tail weight due to the surface area of tail. Then modify the design to get the motor where it needs to be. The reason for all this is that while you can add weight to ballance the plane, the lighter it is, the tighter it turns and the faster it flies but more important is to keep mass out of the extremities of the plane. Mass in the extremities means the turning moments are working against extra enertia that both resist turning and resist straightening up out of a turn.
If it were me, I'd be doing surgery to move the motor back to get the CG around 20% of the mean chord behind the LE.
Regards,
Ken
From somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane
AMA 6733
Aeromaniacs · May 11, 2004 09:33 PM
#6 sourceHeman Lee
Alameda Aer-O-Nuts
Bill Osborne C/L Field
www.aeromaniacs.com
Brett Buck · May 11, 2004 10:45 PM
#9 source>the tail to get the CG right. My total flight weight was
>still under 41 oz. I doubt the extra 2oz. will make it fly
>like a pig.
Considering it was designed to fly around 45-48, I would probably agree with you!
If the engine runs well, just put weight in the tail until it balances. Don't mess up a good engine run to save a piddling amount of weight. Of course if it doesn't run well, then fix it.
Brett
I put a piece of aluminum tubing over the stock pushrod, and it stiffened it up fine. Dixon and Morris sell graphite tubing that fits over the wire also.
Hope this helps.
Eric Viglione
Phil C
I haven't heard a word from Frank yet. If he doesn't call tonight, perhaps we should make some arrangements.
Chip
>flights. I have a CG problem with it for balancing it. It
>is WAY Nose heavy. With an empty tank it takes 4 oz of tail
>weight with the spinner off. I have an os fp 35 in it with
>stock muffler and a great planes uluminum spinner. I alreay
>added two oz of tail weight but it still is way nose heavy
>and down want to climb up. Should I have 2 more oz's?? I'm
>going to go flying tomorrow probably with it, so hopefully I
>can get it flying right even with it getting to be a brick.
>Anyone have this problem?
>Ryan
Ron B.
F4Fguy
I'm a little confused by your comment about it's behaviour.Do I read correctly that it wants to climb,unless you add down?If so,the problem is most likely mis-alignment rather than fore/aft balance.
Re-check the wing /tail/thrust alignment to be sure it's 0-0-0.Also check the flap/elevator setting to ensure they are both at 0.It sounds as if you may have a little down flap at 0 elevator.
The one I have is balanced at the spec point with an O.S.35S with stock muffler.The FP35 is a little heavier but not enough to need 2+oz. of tail weight.Adding tail weight to compensate a mis-alignment problem is courting disaster.
If the problem really is balance point,removing weight from the front is preferable to adding tail weight.The tongue muffler is one way to do this.Another way is,as has been suggested,moving the engine closer to the firewall,reducing it's moment.
Ron B.
Phil and Chip, Frank hasen't called here yet about flying. Hopefully we will be this saturday. I'll bring my new bi-slob with. I just got home from flying it and it is a blast!
F4Fguy
Ryan:
One other point;is the spinner back plate distance set per the revised Great Planes/Goldberg instruction?The original instructions had this dimension from the edge of the fuselage side to the back plate.The revised,and correct,dimension is from the FIREWALL to the back plate.this could be the reason you need so much tail weight.
Ron B.