Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Photos of Tail heavy Pathfinder Previous post

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 19 of 19 known posts recovered

inverted2 · May 13, 2004 08:01 PM

#0 source
Following is some photos you requested showing weights size and position. CG picture and others.

Thanks for the help.
Inverted

I could not get a weight photo alone or do I have a scale to weight the plane I think it is about 45 to 50 oz.

paul s

peabody · May 13, 2004 08:10 PM

#1 source
Paul...I would put a tank and the stock muffler on the critter, and add a tail skid and fly it.

See Ya

Peabody

Aeromaniacs · May 13, 2004 08:15 PM

#2 source
From your picture, it look like you are balancing it about 1" behind the LE. If true, it look more nose heavy that tail heavy.

Are you saying you have 12oz of weight in the tail? I find that very hard to believe. I don't see any weight back there in your picture.

Heman Lee
Alameda Aer-O-Nuts
Bill Osborne C/L Field
www.aeromaniacs.com

inverted · May 13, 2004 08:53 PM

#3 source
The first photot shows cg 3/8 inch or 2.5 inches behind leading edge.
The fourth photo shows three 4 oz. weights in the nose to correct the heavy tail.
Thanks for everyone who replied.

Bill Little · May 13, 2004 09:08 PM

#4 source
Wait a minute....... Inverted 2 ?? Sure don't know Paul S........
Anyway..... did you try to balance it with a tank and muffler in place??? A metal tank, heavier nose wheel, stock muffler, etc., and you can lose some of the lead weights.
Bill <><

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

Steve Fitton · May 14, 2004 02:36 AM

#8 source
I'm totally lost Bill. That does not look like Rake's car in the background of the picture, either. Could there be TWO identical; cases?

This reminds me of the old Sci-Fi movie Doppelganger, where there were two identical earths, with teeny but bizarre differences, like electrical polarity....


We'll have to give John a call from Marietta and stir him up.


Steve

Aeromaniacs · May 13, 2004 10:48 PM

#5 source
LAST EDITED ON May-13-04 AT 11:17 PM (CDT)
 
I still don't know what you are talking about? What is 3/8" or 2.5" behind the leading edge. If you are balancing 2.5" behind the L.E. at the fusage, I don't think that you are too tail heavy. The center chord on the Pathfinder is about 12", so 2.5" behind the LE would put it about 21 percent of chord. That is not an un-reasonable number.

From your photo, it look like you only have 1 oz of weight in the nose. Why don't you put back the stock muffler, and add the tank before you measure the C.G. It sure doesn't look like 12 oz of lead in the nose. How are you measure your C.G. Where are measure the C.G. ? Are you taking is from the midpoint between each wing panal to get the MGC (Mean Geometric Chord). Please read Brett Article on my web site on "Bench Trimming"


Heman Lee
Alameda Aer-O-Nuts
Bill Osborne C/L Field
www.aeromaniacs.com

Alan Hahn · May 13, 2004 11:03 PM

#6 source
My plans show the CG at ~2 3/4 " back from the Leading edge, almost directly over the where the main gear mounts to the wing (aft of the spar).

Also as I understand, the plane was designed to use a stock FP40 muffler (I am not sure if this was the RC or the CL muffler (the current RC muffler is heavier). I note that your icture shows a tongue muffler (I think). I think a stock muffler is in the 2 oz (or more) range.

Alan

gso · May 14, 2004 01:17 AM

#7 source
Inverted,
If I understand you right,the c/g is 2 1/2 inches behind the leading edge.If this is correct then take the weights off and put you tank on and go fly it.My Pathfinder has an os 40fp with a tube muffler. The muffler weighs 1 1/2oz.The c/g is 2 5/8 back from the leading egde.I hope this helps.

Gordy

Gordan Delaney

inverted2 · May 14, 2004 07:35 AM

#9 source
That is Johns plane I was just helping him get some photos out there for a better idea of what was going on.

Paul

paul s

Larry Cunningham · May 14, 2004 12:23 PM

#10 source
There has to be an explanation here, that hasn't been discovered.

Is there some confusion going on between metric and English units, perhaps? 1" = 2.54 cm. The balance photo does not look like 2.5" to
me. Perhaps it is 2.5 cm?

That doesn't look like 4 ounces of lead to me either..

Something is not adding up, still. Too many Pathfinders get built, flown, perform well, without even looking at the CG!

[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]

"There was never a genius without a tincture of madness." -Aristotle

Rustler · May 14, 2004 05:08 PM

#11 source
Does anyone else think the main gear looks too far forward, for a trike gear?

Ian R.

F4FGuy · May 14, 2004 08:17 PM

#12 source
>Does anyone else think the main gear looks too far forward,
>for a trike gear?

Ron B.
F4Fguy

As I remember the design,the gear are in specified position,and yet it sets in the normal trike position,nose wheel down.This reinforces the notion that it's not tail heavy.

Pull all the weights,install the tank and stock muffler,and FLY IT.THEN trim to your flying style.If it's too sensitive,as it will be if it really is tail heavy,fly the tank out straight and level.Then,and ONLY then,add weight(front or rear)as needed until it flies the way you like it.

Ron B.

GLBahrman · May 14, 2004 08:43 PM

#13 source
LAST EDITED ON May-16-04 AT 08:45 PM (CDT)
 
My plans show the gear blocks to be 2 5/8 from the leading edge to the center of the blocks or the center of the wire in the wing. But that does not look like what we're seeing here!!!!. Good ketch Ian. So if he is trying to balance it on all three wheels he will need a ton of lead up front due to the gear being too far forward. Need feedback from Inverted to verify as the picture is still hard to see. EDIT: Went back and checked the plans again and it's still 2 5/8 which is behind the spar.

Greg L. Bahrman

Gary Tultz · May 14, 2004 10:28 PM

#14 source
LAST EDITED ON May-14-04 AT 10:30 PM (CDT)
 
By the looks of the first picture, he has the gear mounted too far forward. My fix.----Lose the nose gear,swap wing gear side for side, bend more forward if needed, install tail wheel. Go have fun flying your new tial dragger.

Gary T

GLBahrman · May 15, 2004 12:00 AM

#15 source
I AGREE!!!

Greg L. Bahrman

TomK · May 15, 2004 11:53 AM

#16 source
I concur. Dump the front wheel and add a tail wheel. Add fuel, fly, repeat

Steven Yampolsky · May 17, 2004 07:25 AM

#17 source
The following is as per Brodak kit plans:
Nose gear position is exactly as per plans. Good!
The CG should be 1/4" BEHIND the main spar. If it's forward of the spar, lighten the nose.
If the plane does not sit level once CG is located in correct place, bend the main landing gear BACK.


Sorry to be brief.

Steven Yampolsky
Webmaster for www.control-line.org

Steven Yampolsky · May 17, 2004 07:30 AM

#18 source
I just looked at the pictures again. Is it just me or is the main gear wheels touch the ground IN FRONT of the main spar!? Bad idea.

The main gear wires are bent in such a way that the wheels should touch the ground roughly 1/2 inch BEHIND the main spar.
Just swap left and right gear legs and that should do it.

Back to work...

Steven Yampolsky
Webmaster for www.control-line.org