Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Why didn't Ted fly his back-up? Answered!

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 6 of 6 known posts recovered

Ted Fancher · Jul 21, 2004 12:02 PM

#0 source
Hi Guys,
I noted several questions regarding my decision not to fly the old original Trivial Pursuit in the US Nats following the inflight failure on the Special Edition. The reasons are pretty simple.

First, logistically. The S.E. was destroyed the first day of qualifying. I had a late draw and was flying an engine test flight at a site away from the official site. When the airplane was destroyed it was already time to leave for the first round of qualifying.

Second, equipment preparation. The T.P. hadn't been flown to speak of for several ... if not many ... years. I flew it a month or so before just to see if it still knew how and then simply threw it in the van for the WCs. If the failure had happened during the WCs there is no question the T.P. would have been brought out of retirement. The PA .61 in the T.P. has only run on Sig Champion fuel and I had none available on short notice. The S.E. used the RoJett .61 which I ran on Powermaster RC fuel ... mostly synthetic. This is not recommended for the PAs and I wouldn't have used it in the .61.

The final and most persuasive argument against trying to get the T.P. in the air was personal. Brett Buck had just spent the better part of two weeks doing any and everything I could ask of him to help me effectively participate in the WCs. This week was to be a joint effort for both of us and we were both looking forward to competing hard to gain the top twenty and ultimately the final five. When the S.E. broke the only way I could have gotten prepared to fly was to have abandoned Brett to his own devices or ... even worse ... asking him to cut short his own preparation to assist me. That wouldn't have been fair and I never considered doing so.

I went to the field to help him fly and advised the administrators I had scratched. Whether or not I had anything to do with it, Brett's ability to concentrate on his own preparation and patterns yielded great results and I'm happy as a clam to have been his tool box caddy while he did so.

Ultimately, as the qualifications panned out--with the blown out first round, etc.--I probably could have pleaded my case with Warren Tiahrt to allow me to "unscratch" and fly in the eventual "sole" round of qualifying on Thursday. I might have been able to convince him but past experience has shown that universal acceptance of such a decision by the competitors would have been unlikely. It seemed better to spend a couple of days watching patterns (something I never do when competing because it "works" on my head). This was instructive and taught me a lot that I had never learned due to that paranoia. I'll probably sit down and write something about that experience for STUNT NEWS.

Ted

Carl Shoup · Jul 21, 2004 01:09 PM

#1 source
Hello Ted, It is great to have great freinds Brett is a lucky man and I am lucky to know you guys. Sorry about the SE.

rootbeard · Jul 21, 2004 01:17 PM

#2 source
I know my little wing man (Josh) would have like to seen you fly. Thanks for taking the time to sign his copy of Stunt News.


Paul

I am a retread, - I did C/L in my youth and did not know what I was doing then other then having fun. And not much has changed.

PJ · Jul 22, 2004 06:16 AM

edited#3 source
Gday ted, I was unaware you had a backup model.

Just one question needs to be address,

Why bring a backup at all? I know what you are saying the old models once retired, just take a bit to long to get into the groove. So why even bother to pack it if you had no intention of using her??

I could say the same thing to P.W hehehehe

But he proves EVERYONE wrong time and time again.

GLBahrman · Jul 22, 2004 08:11 AM

edited#4 source
PJ,
You must of missed this part. Ted appears to be an honorable and fair person. And he had concern for a friend as did Windy when he helped the Chinese youth. I would never ask your question. Ted has his priorities straight.

If the failure had happened during the WCs there is no question the T.P. would have been brought out of retirement. The PA .61 in the T.P. has only run on Sig Champion fuel and I had none available on short notice.

The final and most persuasive argument against trying to get the T.P. in the air was personal. Brett Buck had just spent the better part of two weeks doing any and everything I could ask of him to help me effectively participate in the WCs. This week was to be a joint effort for both of us and we were both looking forward to competing hard to gain the top twenty and ultimately the final five. When the S.E. broke the only way I could have gotten prepared to fly was to have abandoned Brett to his own devices or ... even worse ... asking him to cut short his own preparation to assist me. That wouldn't have been fair and I never considered doing so.

Larry Cunningham · Jul 22, 2004 09:40 PM

#5 source
Let me just take that old, gnarly, backup TP off your hands, Ted.

You KNOW there's a good chance someone would just drive over it in the Lincoln anyway!

[photo not recovered: 3e69bb3870f12ad5.jpg]

"I know what pleasure is, for I have done good work." -Robert Louis Stevenson