Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

I guess I should really listen to Fred K.!

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 2 of 2 known posts recovered

Alan Hahn · Jul 21, 2004 01:29 PM

#0 source
In another thread about the Brodak Tanks being a little wider than 2", Fred K. made the comment that one should pop the ends off the tank and make new ends that slide inside--this would now make the tank just shy of being 2" wide. My rejoinder to fred was that I just hate having to unsolder bought (as opposed to BOT) tanks, because at that point I end of feeling that I should just have made my own anyway.

Well my answer came back to haunt me. Last year I bought a 4 oz metal tank to replace the stock Nobler Arf tank (and also my 4 oz clunk tank), and with it, my Brodak 40 just ran great. My only "problem" was that with a borrowed BY&O 11-4 prop (thanks Fred!), the combination had a tendency to wind up in the wind.

Early this year I decided to look for a new prop which didn't have this windup problem, starting with an 11-4 Black Grish Tornado. I immediately began to have run problems, which I thought was due to harmonics frothing up the fuel in my tank. I added some bamboo skewers to tie the two hardwood mounts together, but the problem persisted. I went to other props (APC, Zinger), and although I tend to like the behavior of the lower pitch, the engine runs became very strange. I attributed the problem to the fuel foaming, and engine heat up. I could get "ok" runs, and flew ok, but usually by the end of the pattern, the Brodak 40 would be in a rich 2 Stroke run. Fortunately the 2 stroke in a Brodak 40 isn't much stronger than the 4 stroke, so I could still fly the combo.

Anyway the problem kept getting worse. I was convinced this was a fuel/heating problem and not a fuel supply problem because I convinced myself that I could hear the uniflow vent coming uncovered near the end of the run, and the engine tended to go richer at that point. Finally this Monday I became fed up and realized that the run really resembled what you would have with a standard (non-uniflow) vented tank. So out came the tank. What I found was that on the top surface of the sheet metal, near the vent tube, a little pitted hole, which I believed was due to a blop of acid flux (from the original soldering of the tank), slowly etching its way thru the side. Since it was on the top surface, near the vent tube, I didn't notice any fuel leakage at all. After I fixed this, I also found just a tiny little leak through the uniflow vent tube/front endplate, but when I went to close that tiny leak, the uniflow vent dropped into the tank! (meaning the other end of the tube was not held internally to anything). This meant I had to open up the end of the tank @$)$_@---and I thought of Fred!

Well It has been a long story, but suffice to say, the engine run is now back to where it was last year, a nice solid growl around the circle, and my search for prop nirvana can begin anew. And yes, I think I'll just make my own tank next time.

Fred Krueger · Jul 21, 2004 02:15 PM

#1 source
smile

Actually, this really drove Alan crazy. At times the effect was very subtle.

This should make me remember to pressure check my tanks every year. I'll have to cut the seal from around the Mustang tank but it will put my mind at rest.

Fred