After I posted a crash picture of Mikey's Super Clown and totally destroyed LA 25, someone suggested using less strong mounting bolts on the engine. That way there would be a planned weak spot, as it were. I have had the cheap slot head sheet metal screws shear off in crashes with R/C planes using those plastic motor mounts. Old time free flight planes often had wood shear pins on the mounting beams, or plywood U-shaped mounts for upright motors.
Of course, it would be nice to continue using socket head bolts for ease of installation, especially under the exhaust stack. McMaster Carr has all kinds of socket head bolts in stainless, regular, high strength, even brass. I'm specifically looking at the 4-40 size. Microfasteners lists aluminum bolts with socket heads.
To get to the point: would changing the bolt material give any better crash resistance? I have bent stainless bolts; maybe something more brittle would be better. How tight does the mounting need to be? Or is it all just whistling in the dark when flying over asphalt? We looked at the divot last week, hard to believe wimpier bolts would have saved the engine. It's not like OS uses super alloy for the cases of their low-end motors.
I could go to nylon bolts; they make them in 4-40 socket head also. Just the thing to keep from crushing the wood on the front of the ARF Flite Streak. Is that what the R/C guys would call a "soft mount"?
John and Mikey in Kalifornia